Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051501537267

Date of advice: 10 April 2019

Ruling

Subject: Income Tax - Deductible Gift Recipient - in Australia requirement

Question 1

Does the Entity satisfy, and will it continue to satisfy, the “in Australia” requirement as described in paragraph (a) of column 4 in item 1 of the table in section 30-15 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) and thereby is/will be entitled to DGR endorsement?

Answer

Yes

Question 2

If the answer to Question 1 is no, would there be any changes that need to be made for the Entity to be entitled to DGR endorsement?

Answer

Not applicable given the answer to Question 1.

Relevant facts and circumstances

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 30-15

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Summary

For the periods that this Ruling applies to, the Entity satisfies, and it will continue to satisfy, the “in Australia” requirement as described in paragraph (a) of column 4 in item 1 of the table in section 30-15 of the ITAA 1997 and thereby is/will entitled to DGR endorsement.

Detailed reasoning

Special condition in paragraph (a) in item 1 of the table in section 30-15 of ITAA 1997 requires a DGR to “be in Australia”.

TR2018/D1 Income tax: the 'in Australia' requirement for certain deductible gift recipients and income tax exempt entities (TR2018/D1) applies the ordinary meaning of the phrase “be in Australia”: Accordingly, the Entity will be in Australia at a particular time if:

Being either established or legally recognised is sufficient. Legal recognition means being given status by the Australian legal system. It could include, for example, registration under the Australian Charities and Not-for-Profits Commission Act 2012, Corporations Act 2001, A New Tax System (Australian Business Number) Act 1999 or as an incorporated association under an Act of Parliament of a State or Territory.

The Entity was established in Australia in XXXX. It is an incorporation association, and also registered as a charity with ACNC. Therefore, the Entity is established and legally recognised in Australia.

According to the Entity’s Constitution, the Entity’s sole purpose is to provide for the relief XXXX by:

As explained above, the Entity’s sole purpose is to XXXX. However, to date, all disbursements have been to people in the poor areas of countries A, B and C. In future, the intention is to provide more assistance to the needy in Australia.

Example 1 of TR 2018/D1 deals with a non-for-profit organisation in Australia registered as a charity with ACNC. This organisation conducts charitable activities overseas, while its funds are held by a trustee that makes operational decisions concerning the fund in Australia. The organisation meets the “in Australia” condition.

Example 2 of TR 2018/D1 considers an Australian entity which has been set up by a global non-for-profit organisation founded in Japan. The funds raised by the organisation from the Australian public are controlled by an executive committee which is made up made up partly from members in Australia and partly from members in Japan. The executive committee meets regularly in Japan, and all operational decisions concerning the fund are made in Japan. The fund does not meet the “in Australia” condition because the managerial and operational decisions concerning the fund are not made in Australia.

Example 6 of TR 2018/D1 describes a situation where a charitable institution, being part of a global network with headquarters in the USA, is registered as a PBI with ACNC. The institution has an office in Sydney and a board of directors in Australia responsible for the day-to-day management of its operations. The global head entity in the USA acts on behalf of all the other worldwide entities to distribute funds in the most effective way. The distribution of funds occurs in partnership with local organisations. The institution in this example meets the DGR in Australia condition because it is established and legally recognised in Australia, and because the day-to-day management of its operations is in Australia.

The Entity has an office in Australia and has all its bank accounts and business dealings within Australia. The Management Committee of the Entity meets in Australia and carries out the day-to-day management while in Australia.

Therefore, the day-to-day operational and managerial decisions are made in Australia. The Entity’s association and cooperation with the international organisation and its charitable activities overseas should not change this position, as the Entity’s Management Committee and other financial members conduct the day-to-day management of the Entity in Australia. Specially, there are no legal, management or financial links between the Entity and the international organisation the relationship being cooperative one, based on a mutual desire to “help others to help themselves”. In practise, the Entity and international organisation operate independently.

Further, the fact that the Entity is associated with international organisations that are stationed outside Australia do not displace the Management Committee’s conduct of the day-to-day management of the Entity’s operations from within Australia.

As established above, the Entity satisfies the DGR “in Australia” requirement as it is established and legally recognised in Australia, and its day-to-day management is in Australia. Therefore, the Entity satisfies condition (a) in item 1 of the table in section 30-15 of ITAA 1997 and thereby the Entity is/will be entitled to DGR endorsement. It is not a requirement for DGR endorsement of the Entity that it has its purposes and beneficiaries in Australia.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).