Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051489729469

Date of advice: 26 April 2019

Ruling

Subject: Traded endowment policies

Question 1

Will the cost base of a unitholder’s units in the Aussie TEP Fund (the Fund) be reduced under Part 3-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) to the extent to which they are assessed under section 97 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) on a share of the income of the Fund?

Answer

No.

Question 2

Will the cost base of a unitholder’s units in the Fund be reduced under Part 3-1 of the ITAA 1997 to the extent to which they receive non-assessable distributions in respect of those units?

Answer

Yes, subject to section 104-71 of the ITAA 1997.

This ruling applies for the following periods:

Income year ending 30 June 2019

Income year ending 30 June 2020

Income year ending 30 June 2021

The scheme commenced on:

6 February 2019

Relevant facts and circumstances

The trust is an Australian unit trust. It offers Investors the opportunity to invest in units of the trust. The trustee of the unit trust invests in TEPs (meaning Endowment Policies that are owned by someone other than the original owner).

The unit trust is an unregistered managed investment scheme which pools Investors’ money and invests in a portfolio of Australian TEPs which have an asset value and a fixed maturity date. The unit trust will hold those TEPs until maturity. Once the TEP is purchased the following occurs:

The TEP is a zero coupon investment and the maturity value of the TEP will include the total of the Sum Insured, Accumulated Reversionary Bonuses (constituting annual bonuses on the TEP credited each year) and a Terminal Bonus (constituting the bonus applied to a TEP on the earlier of death of the original life insured or the fixed maturity date of the policy).

Each Unit in the Fund confers an equal and proportionate beneficial interest in the net assets of the Fund. Any person that is a Unitholder during the Financial Year will be presently entitled to all of the Distributable Amount payable to them in respect of the relevant Financial Year in the proportion that the Distributable Amount payable to them in respect of the Financial Year bears to the sum of the Distributable Amount payable to all Unitholders.

Assumptions

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 section 97

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 subsection 95(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Part 3-1

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 104-70

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 104-70(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 paragraph 104-70(1)(b)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 104-71

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 118-300(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 118-300(1A)

Life Insurance Act 1995 section 200

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Detailed reasoning

A reduction in the cost base of the units may occur when a payment is made to a unitholder in respect of the unit and some or all of that payment is not included in the assessable income of the taxpayer (the unitholder), see section 104-70 of the ITAA 1997.

Where an amount is included in the net income of the trust estate as calculated pursuant to subsection 95(1) of the ITAA 1936 and a unitholder is presently entitled to a share of that income under section 97 of the ITAA 1936, the taxpayer is assessed on that share of income. Therefore that share of income will not reduce the unit’s cost base held by the taxpayer.

Question 2

Detailed reasoning

Subsection 104-70(1) of the ITAA 1997 states:

CGT event E4 happens if:

Where the amount by which the distribution from the Fund exceeds the amount assessable to the Unitholders, this amount is potentially a 'non-assessable' part for the purposes of section 104-70 of the ITAA 1997. However section 104-71 of the ITAA 1997 provides exclusions and states:

Subsection 118-300(1A) of the ITAA 1997 provides:

Subsection 118-300(1) of the ITAA 1997 states at item 3 in the table

3

A policy of insurance on the life of an individual or an *annuity instrument

the original owner of the policy or instrument (other than the trustee of a *complying superannuation entity)

The Explanatory Memorandum to Tax and Superannuation Laws Amendment (2014 Measures No. 7) Bill 2014 provides:

Therefore where the non-assessable part includes an amount to which subsection 118-300(1A) of the ITAA 1997 applies, this amount is disregarded for the purposes paragraph 104-70(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997, which provides that CGT event E4 happens where some or all of a trust distribution is not included in a unitholder’s assessable income.

The cost base of the unitholder’s units in the trust must be reduced by the amount of the non-assessable part of the distribution (and a capital gain will arise to the extent the reduction required would otherwise take the cost base below nil).


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).