1051621969587 | Legal database

Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private advice

Authorisation Number: 1051621969587

Date of advice: 20 December 2019

Ruling

Subject: Income tax implications in respect of franked distributions

Question 1

Do the qualified person provisions in Division 1A of former Part IIIAA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) (Division 1A) and paragraph 207-150(1)(a) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) apply to you in respect of any franked distribution made by Company A Pty Ltd (Company A) that flows indirectly to you for the years 30 June 2020 to 30 June 2024 (Income Years)?

Answer

Question 2

Are you a qualified person for the purposes of Division 1A and paragraph 207-150(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997 in respect of any franked distribution made by Company B Pty Ltd (Company B) to the Estate which flows indirectly to you during the Income Years?

Answer

Yes

Question 3

Are you entitled to a tax offset where you are assessable under section 99 or 99A of the ITAA 1936 on the share of net income from the dividends flowing indirectly to you by Company A and or Company B in the event no beneficiary is presently entitled?

Answer

Yes

This ruling applies for the following periods:

01/07/2019 to 30/06/2024

The scheme commences on:

01/07/2019

Relevant facts and circumstances

On XX/XX/XXXX, Mr X passed away.
The legal ownership of all of Mr X's assets were subsequently passed onto the Estate.
The assets included:

X ordinary shares in Company A; and

X ordinary shares in Company B.

Company A was incorporated by the late Mr X on XX/XX/XXXX. All of the ordinary shares in Company A were owned by Mr X until the date of his death. Once probate was granted, the ordinary shares were transferred to the Estate.
The shares in Company B were acquired by the late Mr X on XX/XX/XXXX by virtue of the vesting of the X Trust (of which the late Mr X was a beneficiary). Once probate was granted, the ordinary shares of Company B were transferred to the Estate.
By resolution dated XX/XX/XXXX, in compliance with subsection 249A(2) and section 254H of the Corporations Act 2001, the ordinary shares were split such that Company A and Company B each have X ordinary shares on issue. This splitting was done in accordance with the will for the purposes of the distribution of these assets.
On XX/XX/XXXX, probate of the last Will and Testament dated XX/XX/XXXX of Mr X was granted to Mr Y and Mr Z, the executors appointed under the will (the Executors).
Clause X of the will for the late Mr X for:

The creation of various testamentary trusts which came into existence upon the death of Mr X, and

the allocation of 100% of the Realisation Receipts and Other Receipts (Receipts) from the Company A and Company B shares referred to in clause X between the various testamentary trusts. Each entitlement is expressed as a percentage.

As part of the realisation of the Company A and Company B assets, certain underlying assets and businesses owned by Company A or Company B may be sold. Following this, a franked dividend will be paid from Company A and/or Company B to the Estate to facilitate the distribution of the proceeds of such sales to the various testamentary trusts in accordance with the will. This will be done via a distribution of the income of the Estate (inclusive of the franked distributions paid by Company A or Company B) to the testamentary trusts.
The amounts to be distributed will comprise mainly franked dividends however there is the possibility of small amounts of interest. All of the amounts distributed will be attributable to the Realisation Receipts and distributed in accordance with Clause X of the will.
The Estate and the Trust are trusts for the purpose of the ITAA 1936 and ITAA 1997.
The Estate and the Trust are resident trust estates.
The Estate and the Trust are non-widely held trusts for the purposes of former Division 1A of the ITAA 1936.
The Estate is taken under former section 160APHH of the ITAA 1936 to have acquired the shares at the time the late Mr X acquired them.
The qualified person provisions in Division 1A and paragraph 207-145(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997 do not have application to the Estate in respect of any franked distribution made directly by Company A during the Income Years.
The Estate is a qualified person for the purposes of Division 1A and paragraph 207-145(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997 in respect of any franked distribution made directly by Company B during the Income Years.
The Executors have determined that the assets of the Estate (including the shares in and/or assets of Company A and Company B) are to be realised via sale and the proceeds are to be distributed to the beneficiaries in accordance with the will.
The Estate has not reached the point of full administration and is in the 'intermediate stage of administration'. This is due to fact that the Executors have determined that all assets of the Estate are to be realised via sale before distribution to the beneficiaries and it is expected that there will be various debts payable by the Estate in undertaking this process.
Due to the quantum of the Estate's assets, no part of the net income of the Estate (including that part that constitutes an interim dividend paid by Company A or Company B) will be required to pay or provide for debts of the Estate.
The Estate will make an interim distribution of the Receipts to the Trust as outlined in the will for the Income Years.
The Estate is not assessable under section 99 or 99A of the ITAA 1936 on the share of income paid as an interim distribution from the Receipts to the Trust for the Income Years.
The net income of the Trust for the relevant year is greater than zero.
The trustees of the Trust or an associate of the trustees will not have made, be under an obligation to make, nor be liable to make, a related payment in respect of any franked distribution made by Company B to the Estate during the Income Years that flows indirectly to them (via a distribution from the Estate).
The franked distribution flowing indirectly to the Trust will not occur in one or more of the circumstances listed in paragraphs (b) to (eb) of subsection 207-150(1) of the ITAA 1997.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 99

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Former Section 160APHH

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Former Section 160APHO

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Former Section 160APHD

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Former Section 160APHG

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Former Section 160APHL

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Former Section 160APHM

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 207-35(3)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 207-45

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 207-50(4)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 207-145

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 207-150

Corporations Act 2001 Subsection 249A(2)

Corporations Act 2001 Section 254H

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Do the qualified person provisions in Division 1A and paragraph 207-150(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997 apply to you in respect of any franked distribution made by Company A that flows indirectly to you during the Income Years?

Summary

No. The qualified person provisions in Division 1A and paragraph 207-150(1)(a) of the ITAA1997 do not apply to you in respect of any franked distribution made by Company A that flows indirectly to you during the Income Years.

Detailed reasoning

Division 207 of the ITAA 1997 sets out the consequences of an entity receiving directly or indirectly a franked distribution from a corporate tax entity. Generally an entity receiving a franked distribution will be required to include an amount equal to the franking credit in their assessable income and be entitled to a tax offset equal to the same amount.
Section 207-150 of Subdivision 207-F of the ITAA 1997 applies where a franked distribution flows indirectly to an entity.
Under subsection 207-150(1) of the ITAA 1997, if an entity to whom a franked distribution is made is 'not a qualified person in relation to the distribution for the purposes of Division 1A' the amount of franking credit received on the distribution is not included in their assessable income, nor can they claim a tax offset equal to the franking credit; and if the distribution flows indirectly through the entity to another entity - subsection 207-35(3) and section 207-45 of the ITAA 1997 do not apply to that other entity.
The very wording of section 207-150 of the ITAA 1997 makes it clear that regard is to be had to the rules in Division 1A in determining whether a person is a qualified person for the purpose of these provisions in respect of a franked distribution.
Though Part IIIAA of the ITAA 1936 ceased to have application from 1 July 2002, it is necessary to have regard to the rules in Division 1A in determining whether an entity is a qualified person for the purpose of the rules contained in the Imputation System irrespective of whether the distribution is made directly or indirectly to the entity on or after 1 July 2002.
Item 25 of Schedule 4 of the Taxation Laws Amendment (No.2) 1999 (93 of 1999) amended Division 1A to apply to shares and interests in shares acquired on or after 1 July 1997 unless an exception occurred.
The qualified person provisions of Division 1A applied to shares that were:

If held directly - acquired on or after 1 July 1997; or

If held indirectly through a trust - acquired after 3pm on 31 December 1997.

Company A was incorporated by the late Mr X on XX/XX/XXXX. All of the ordinary shares in Company A were owned by Mr X until the date of his death. Once probate was granted, the ordinary shares were transferred to the Estate.
The Estate is taken under former section 160APHH of the ITAA 1936 to have acquired the shares at the time the late Mr X acquired them.
Clause X of the will provides for:

The creation of various testamentary trusts which came into existence upon the death of the late Mr X, and

the allocation of 100% of the Realisation Receipts and Other Receipts (Receipts) from the Company A and Company B shares referred to in clause X of the will between the various testamentary trusts. Each entitlement is expressed as a percentage.

The Trust is a testamentary trust created under the will. This Trust is a non-widely held trust for the purposes of Division 1A.
Former subsection 160APHG(3) of the ITAA 1936 states:

If the trustee of a trust (other than a widely held trust) acquires, holds, or disposes of, shares or an interest in shares, each beneficiary of the trust (including, if the trust is a discretionary trust, a potential beneficiary) is taken to acquire, hold, or dispose of, as the case may be, an interest in the shares.

Consequently, a beneficiary of the Estate will be taken to hold an interest in the shares while the Estate holds the shares.
The legal ownership of the assets owned by Mr X was passed onto the Estate at the time he died. The assets included the X ordinary shares in Company A.
By resolution dated XX/XX/XXXX, in compliance with subsection 249A(2) and section 254H of the Corporations Act 2001, the ordinary shares were split such that Company A and Company B each have X ordinary shares on issue. This splitting was done in accordance with the will for the purposes of the distribution of these assets.
As inferred in the paragraph 4.34 of the Explanatory Memorandum to the Tax Laws Amendment Act (No.2) 1999), the splitting of shares is not considered to be a new acquisition of shares. Further Taxation Determination TD 2000/10 Income tax: capital gains: what are the CGT consequences for a shareholder if a company converts its shares into a larger or smaller number of shares? (TD 2000/10) provides that:

While there is a change in the form of the original shares, there is no change in their beneficial ownership...

Based on the facts provided, the shares are taken to be acquired by the Trust at the same time as the Estate and the late Mr X acquired them, being XX/XX/XXXX. As this date is prior to 1 July 1997, the qualified person provisions under paragraph 207-150(1)(a) have no application.

Question 2

Are you a qualified person for the purposes of Division 1A and paragraph 207-150(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997 in respect of any franked distribution made by Company B to the Estate which flows indirectly to you during the Income Years?

Summary

You are a qualified person for the purposes of Division 1A and paragraph 207-150(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997 in respect of any franked distribution made by Company B to the Estate which flows indirectly to you during the Income Years.

Detailed reasoning

Division 207 of the ITAA 1997 sets out the consequences of an entity receiving directly or indirectly a franked distribution from a corporate tax entity. Generally an entity receiving a franked distribution will be required to include an amount equal to the franking credit in their assessable income and be entitled to a tax offset equal to the same amount.
Under subsection 207-150(1) of the ITAA 1997, if an entity to whom a franked distribution is made is 'not a qualified person in relation to the distribution for the purposes of Division 1A ....' the amount of franking credit received on the distribution is not included in their assessable income, nor can they claim a tax offset equal to the franking credit; and if the distribution flows indirectly through the entity to another entity - subsection 207-35(3) and section 207-45 of the ITAA 1997 do not apply to that other entity.
The very wording of section 207-150 of the ITAA 1997 makes it clear that regard is to be had to the rules in Division 1A in determining whether a person is a qualified person for the purpose of these provisions in respect of a franked distribution.
Though Part IIIAA of the ITAA 1936 ceased to have application from 1 July 2002, it is necessary to have regard to the rules in Division 1A in determining whether an entity is a qualified person for the purpose of the rules contained in the Imputation System in respect of a franked distribution made directly or indirectly to the entity on or after 1 July 2002.
Item 25 of Schedule 4 of the Taxation Laws Amendment (No.2) 1999 (93 of 1999) amended Division 1A to apply to shares and interests in shares acquired on or after 1 July 1997 unless an exception occurred.
The qualified person provisions of Division 1A applied to shares that were:

If held directly - acquired on or after 1 July 1997; or

If held indirectly through a trust - acquired after 3pm on 31 December 1997.

The shares in Company B were acquired by the late Mr X on XX/XX/XXX by virtue of the vesting of the X Trust (of which the late Mr X was a beneficiary). Once probate was granted, the X ordinary shares of Company B were transferred to the Estate.
Clause X of the will provides for:

The creation of various testamentary trusts which came into existence upon the death of the late Mr X, and

The Trust is a testamentary trust created under the will. This Trust is a non-widely held trust for the purposes of Division 1A.
By resolution dated XX/XX/XXXX, in compliance with subsection 249A(2) and section 254H of the Corporations Act 2001, the ordinary shares were split such that Company B has X ordinary shares on issue. This splitting was done in accordance with the will for the purposes of the distribution of these assets.
As inferred in the paragraph 4.34 of the Explanatory Memorandum to the Tax Laws Amendment Act (No.2) 1999), the splitting of shares is not considered to be a new acquisition of shares. Further TD 2000/10 provides that:

While there is a change in the form of the original shares, there is no change in their beneficial ownership........

Former subsection 160APHG(3) of the ITAA 1936 states:

Since the shares were acquired by the deceased after 31 December 1997, the qualified person provisions of Division 1A will apply. By virtue of former subsection 160APHH(4) of the ITAA 1936, the Estate will also be taken to have acquired the shares on XX/XX/XXXX, the day on which the deceased acquired the shares. Accordingly, the qualified person provisions have application and it is therefore necessary to consider whether the entity is a qualified person as per former section 160APHO of the ITAA 1936, and holds the shares or interest in shares at risk for the minimum 'qualifying period'.
Under former subsection 160APHO(1) of the ITAA 1936:

A taxpayer who has held shares or an interest in shares on which a dividend has been paid is a qualified person in relation to the dividend if:

a) Where neither the taxpayer nor an associate of the taxpayer has made, is under an obligation to make, or is likely to make, a related payment in respect of the dividend - the taxpayer has satisfied subsection (2) in relation to the primary qualification period in relation to the dividend; or

b) Where the taxpayer or an associate of the taxpayer has made, is under an obligation to make, or is likely to make, a related payment in respect of the dividend - the taxpayer has satisfied subsection (2) in relation to the secondary qualification period in relation to the dividend.

The Executors of the Estate will not have made, be under an obligation to make, nor be liable to make, a related payment in respect of any franked distribution made by Company B to the Estate during the Income Year, therefore former subsection 160APHO(2) of the ITAA 1936 must be considered in relation to the primary qualification period.
Former section 160APHD of the ITAA 1936 defines primary qualification period as:

In relation to a taxpayer in relation to shares or an interest in shares, means the period beginning on the day after the day on which the taxpayer acquired the shares or interest and ending:

(a) if the shares are not preference shares - on the 45th day after the day on which the shares or interest became ex dividend; or

(b) if the shares are preference shares - on the 90^th day after the day on which the shares or interest became ex dividend.

Under former subsection 160APHO(2) of the ITAA 1936:

A taxpayer who has held shares or an interest in shares on which a dividend has been paid satisfies this subsection in relation to a qualification period in relation to the shares or interest if, during the period:

(a) Where the taxpayer held the shares - the taxpayer held the shares for a continuous period (not counting the day on which the taxpayer acquired the shares or, if the taxpayer has disposed of the shares, the day on which the disposal occurred) of not less than:

(i) if the shares are not preference shares - 45 days; or

(ii) if the shares are preference shares - 90 days;

Former subsection APHO(3) of the ITAA 1936 states that:

In calculating the number of days for which the taxpayer continuously held the shares or interest, any days on which the taxpayer has materially diminished risks of loss or opportunities for gain in respect of the shares or interest are to be excluded, but the exclusion of those days is not taken to break the continuity of the period for which the taxpayer held the shares of interest.

Former section 160APHM of the ITAA 1936 states that a taxpayer has materially diminished risks of loss or opportunities for gain on a particular day if the taxpayer's net position on that day in relation to the shares or interest has less than 30% of those risks and opportunities.
The Trusts interest in the relevant shares held by the executor of the deceased estate will be determined under former subsection 160APHL(5) of the ITAA 1936. The net position is calculated by adding the sum of the taxpayer's long positions (+ deltas) and the sum of the taxpayer's short positions (- deltas). Former subsection 160APHL(7) provides for the taxpayer's interest determined under former section 160APHL(5) to have a long position with a delta of plus one in relation to itself. As the trust is a deceased estate, under paragraph (b) of former subsection 160APHL(10) of the ITAA 1936 the beneficiary of the trust will not be taken to have acquired either a short position equal to the beneficiary's long position under former sub-section 160APHL(7) or a long position equal to so much of the taxpayer's interest in the trust holding as is a fixed interest.
Consequently, in the absence of any other long or short positions, the Trust will be taken to have held the relevant interest in the shares at risk.
The Estate would have held the shares at risk for at least 45 days during their period of ownership as the Estate satisfied the qualified person test in former section 160APHO of the ITAA 1936 in relation to the Company B shares. Therefore the Trust will also have held the Company B shares at risk for at least 45 days since the date they were taken to have acquired them.

64. Having regard to the circumstances and the facts provided the Trust will be a qualified person for the purposes of Division 1A and paragraph 207-150(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997 in respect of any franked distribution made by Company B indirectly to the Trust during the Income Years.

Question 3

Summary

Yes. You are entitled to a tax offset where you are assessable under section 99 or 99A on the share of net income from the dividends flowing indirectly to you by Company A and or Company B in the event no beneficiary is presently entitled.

Detailed reasoning

65. Subdivision 207-B of the ITAA 1997 deals with franked distributions received through certain partnerships and trustees. This subdivision deals with an entity that receives a benefit of a franked distribution where:

a. the distribution is made to a partnership or the trustee of a trust; and

b. the benefit is received either directly or through other interposed partnerships or trusts.

Section 207-45 of the ITAA 1997 deals with tax offsets where the distribution flows indirectly to an entity. Section 207-45 of the ITAA 1997 states that:

An entity to whom a *franked distribution *flows indirectly in an income year is entitled to a *tax offset for that income year that is equal to its *share of the *franking credit on the distribution, if it is:

a) an individual; or

b) a *corporate tax entity when the distribution flows indirectly to it; or

c) the trustee of a trust that is liable to be assessed on a share of, or all or a part of, the trust's *net income under section 98, 99 or 99A of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 for that income year; or

d) the trustee of a *complying superannuation fund, a *non-complying superannuation fund, a *complying approved deposit fund, a *non-complying approved deposit fund or a *pooled superannuation trust in relation to that income year.

Under subsection 207-50(4) of the ITAA 1997 a franked distribution flows indirectly to the trustee of a trust in an income year if, and only if:

(a) during that income year, the distribution is made to the trustee, or flows indirectly to the trustee as a partner or beneficiary because of a previous application of subsection (2) or (3); and

(b) the trustee is liable or, but for another provision in this Act, would be liable, to be assessed in respect of an amount (the share amount ) that is:

(i) a share of the trust's *net income for that income year under section 98 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936; or

(ii) all or a part of the trust's net income for that income year under section 99 or 99A of that Act;

(whether or not the share amount becomes assessable income in the hands of the trustee); and

(c) the trustee's *share of the distribution under section 207-55 is a positive amount (whether or not the trustee actually receives any of that share).

68. As the distribution is made to the Trust it is taken under subsection 207-50(4) of the ITAA 1997 to have been made indirectly thereby satisfying the requirement under subsection 207-45(c) of the ITAA 1997 for that income year. Therefore in the event that the trustee is assessed on the franked distribution as the ultimate recipient they will be entitled to a franking credit under section 207-45 of the ITAA 1997.

69. Section 207-150 of the ITAA 1997 will not impact on your entitlement to the tax offset as none of the circumstances listed in paragraphs (b) to (eb) of this section will occur. The qualified person rule in paragraph 207-150(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997 has no application in respect to the Company A shares as per question 2. The qualified person rule in paragraph 207-150(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997 has been satisfied in respect to the Company B shares as per question 3. For these reasons the entitlement to the tax offset will not be limited under paragraph 207-150(1)(g) of the ITAA 1997.

Copyright notice

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).