Disclaimer
You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private advice

Authorisation Number: 1051785027368

Date of advice: 22 December 2020

Ruling

Subject: Provision of benefits by a religious institution to a religious practitioner

Question

Are benefits provided to the SRE Director employed by a registered religious institution exempt under section 57 of the FBTAA?

Answer

Yes

This ruling applies for the following periods:

FBT year ending 31 March 2020

FBT year ending 31 March 2021

FBT year ending 31 March 2022

FBT year ending 31 March 2023

FBT year ending 31 March 2024

The scheme commences on:

1 April 2019

Relevant facts and circumstances

The employer is registered with the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC) with the subtype of 'advancing religion'.

The employee is an SRE Director with the employer.

The SRE Director is a student at an institution who is undertaking a course of instruction in the duties of a minister of religion.

The employee will receive salary and non-monetary benefits under an employment agreement.

The duties of the employee are primarily in respect of the propagation of religious beliefs and/or pastoral duties.

Relevant legislative provisions

FBTAA Section 57

FBTAA Subsection 136(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 995-1(1)

Reasons for decision

Section 57 of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (FBTAA 1986) provides an exemption for benefits provided to employees of religious institutions where four conditions are met. The conditions are as follows:

•   the employer of an employee is a religious institution;

•   the employee is a religious practitioner;

•   the benefit is provided to the employee, or to a spouse or a child of the employee; and

•   the benefit is not provided principally in respect of duties of the employee other than:

i. pastoral duties; or

ii. any other duties or activities that are directly related to the practice, study, teaching or propagation of religious beliefs.

The Australian Taxation Office's position concerning the above conditions is discussed in Taxation Ruling TR 2019/3 - Fringe benefits tax: benefits provided to religious practitioners

The employer of the employee is a religious institution.

Paragraph 7 of TR 2019/3 explains that in considering whether a benefit is provided by a registered religious institution, administration by the ATO is limited to determining that the entity is an institution that maintains current ACNC registration with a subtype 'advancing religion'. This employer is registered with the ACNC with the subtype of 'advancing religion' with its role to provide services for religious organisations. In the context of the FBTAA, the word 'institution' refers to a significant body which is a recognised part of society, and for which the grant of an exemption is seen to provide a public benefit. The employer meets this requirement.

The employee is a religious practitioner

Paragraph 12 of TR 2019/3 notes that 'Religious practitioner' is defined to mean (under subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA 1986 and subsection 995-1(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997):

•   a minister of religion

•   a student at an institution who is undertaking a course of instruction in the duties of a minister of religion

•   a full-time member of a religious order, or

•   a student at a college conducted solely for training persons to become members of religious orders.

The SRE Director is a student in a course of instruction in the duties of a minister of religion.

We accept that the SRE Director is employed as a religious practitioner.

The benefit is provided to the employee, or to a spouse or a child of the employee.

The benefits are provided to the employee under an employment agreement.

The benefit is in respect of duties or activities that are directly related to the practice, study, teaching or propagation of religious beliefs.

To be exempt, paragraph (d) of section 57 of the FBTAA requires that a benefit must not be provided principally for duties other than pastoral duties, or duties or activities that are directly related to the practice, study, teaching or propagation of religious beliefs ('directly related religious activities').

This requirement is satisfied in this case.

Conclusion

The employer is a registered religious institution, and the employee is a religious practitioner, it is concluded that the benefits provided to the employee is principally in respect of the pastoral duties of a religious practitioner.

Therefore, the benefits provided will be exempt benefits in accordance with section 57 of the FBTAA.

 


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).