Disclaimer
You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private advice

Authorisation Number: 1052117705198

Date of advice: 17 May 2023

Ruling

Subject: Active asset

Issues

Question

Are the premises used by the Taxpayer to carry on a storage business an active asset under section 152-40 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?

Answer

Yes.

This ruling applies for the following periods:

1 July XXXX to 30 June XXXX

Relevant facts and circumstances

The Taxpayer purchased land, for the development of a storage facility plans were approved for the construction of x storage units, which included provision for a cleaner store and office.

Prior to opening the facility, security fencing and automatic gates were installed along with an electronic security system.

Each customer (Storer) must accept the terms of a 'Standard Self Storage Agreement' (Agreement) to use a Storage Unit, and upon agreement is allocated a shed access pin code.

The unexecuted Agreement has the following relevant provisions:

made by the Storer to the Facility Owner for use of the Storage Unit (Storage Fee).

o   (X) The Storer must not store any Goods that are dangerous, hazardous, illegal, stolen, inflammable, explosive, environmentally harmful, perishable or that are a risk to the property of any person.

o   (X) The Storer must not store items which are irreplaceable. Such as currency, jewellery, furs, deeds, paintings, curios, works of art, items of personal sentimental value.

o   (X) The Storer will use the Space solely for the purpose of storage and shall not carry on any business or other activity in the Space.

o   (X) The Storer must not attach nails, screws etc. to any part of the Space must maintain the Space by ensuring it is clean and a store of good repair and must not damage or alter the Space without the Facility Owner's consent. In the event of uncleanliness of or damage to the Space or Facility the Facility Owner will be entitled to retain the Storer's deposit charge a cleaning fee, and/or full reimbursement from the Storer to the value of the repairs required.

o   (X) The Storer cannot assign the Agreement.

The Facility Owner is also responsible for:

The Taxpayer uses a real estate agent to collect income payments from customers.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 152-40

Reasons for decision

Question

Summary

In the particular circumstances described, the premises used by the Taxpayer to carry on a storage business are an active asset under section 152-40 of the ITAA 1997 - the storage facility does not fall within the exception in paragraph 152-40(4)(e) of the ITAA 1997.

Detailed reasoning

For a CGT asset of a business to be an active asset for the purposes of Division 152 of the ITAA 1997 it must firstly satisfy one of the 'positive tests' in subsection 152-40(1) of the ITAA 1997 and then also not be excluded by one of the exceptions in subsection 152-40(4) of the ITAA 1997.

Under paragraph 152-40(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997 a CGT asset is an active asset (subject to the exclusions) if it is owned and used, or held ready for use, in the course of carrying on a business. As the storage sheds are owned and used in the course of the taxpayer's business of providing commercial storage space, they satisfy the requirements of paragraph 152-40(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997.

However, paragraph 152-40(4)(e) of the ITAA 1997 provides that an asset whose main use in the course of carrying on the business is to derive rent cannot be an active asset (unless that main use was only temporary). That is, even if the asset is used in a business it will not be an active asset if its main use is to derive rent.

In TD 2006/78 (Income tax: capital gains: are there any circumstances in which the premises used in a business of providing accommodation for reward may satisfy the active asset test in section 152-35 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 notwithstanding the exclusion in paragraph 152-40(4)(e) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 for assets whose main use is to derive rent?) the Commissioner explains the circumstances in which it is considered that the asset's main use is to derive rent.

The term 'rent' has been described as follows:

•         the amount payable by a tenant to a landlord for the use of the leased premises (C.H. Bailey Ltd v. Memorial Enterprises Ltd [1974] 1 All ER 1003 at 1010, United Scientific Holdings Ltd v. Burnley Borough Council [1977] 2 All ER 62 at 76, 86, 93, 99);

•         a tenant's periodical payment to an owner or landlord for the use of land or premises (The Australian Oxford Dictionary, 1999, Oxford University Press, Melbourne); and

•         recompense paid by the tenant to the landlord for the exclusive possession of corporeal hereditaments. ....... The modern conception of rent is a payment which a tenant is bound by contract to make to his landlord for the use of the property let (Halsbury's Laws of England 4th Edition Reissue, Butterworths, London 1994, Vol 27(1) 'Landlord and Tenant', paragraph 212).

Whether an asset's main use is to derive rent will depend on the particular circumstances of each case.

A key factor therefore in determining whether an occupant of premises is a lessee is whether the occupier has a right to exclusive possession (Radaich v. Smith (1959) 101 CLR 209; Tingari Village North Pty Ltd v. Commissioner of Taxation [2010] AATA 233 at paragraphs 44-46, 2010 ATC 10-131, 78 ATR 693). Where premises are leased to a tenant under a lease agreement granting exclusive possession, the payments involved are likely to be rent and the premises not an active asset. On the other hand, if the arrangement allows the person only to enter and use the premises for certain purposes and does not amount to a lease granting exclusive possession, the payments involved are unlikely to be rent.

Relevant factors to consider (in addition to whether the occupier has a right to exclusive possession) include the degree of control retained by the owner and the extent of any services provided by the owner (Allen v. Aller (1966) 1 NSWR 572), Appah v. Parncliffe Investments Ltd [1964] 1 All ER 838 and Marchant v. Charters [1977] 3 All ER 918).

Relevantly, the Commissioner explains that a storage facility is not excluded by paragraph 152-40(4)(e) of the ITAA 1997 and is therefore an active asset in the following circumstances:

Example 2: commercial storage

4. Christine carries on a business of providing commercial storage space. The storage facility comprises 50 storage sheds which are available for hire for periods of 1 week to 2 years or more. Christine provides office facilities and 24 hour on-site security. She also provides various items of equipment for sale or loan to clients such as trolleys, cardboard boxes, brooms, tape, pens, locks, bolt cutters, torches and shelves. A cleaning service is also provided and charged for.

5. Christine enters into a storage agreement with each client. The agreements provide that in certain circumstances she can relocate the client to another space or enter the space without consent and that the client cannot assign the rights under the agreement.

6. The arrangements entered into in this situation indicate that the users of the storage sheds do not have the right to exclusive possession but rather only the right to enter and use the sheds for certain purposes. Some of the arrangements entered into were short term and a range of services were provided to the users. There was also no intention by the parties to grant a lease.

7. Having regard to all the circumstances, the Tax Office considers a tenant/landlord relationship does not exist between the parties in this example and therefore the amounts received are not rent. Accordingly, the storage facility is not excluded by paragraph 152-40(4)(e) of the ITAA 1997 and is therefore an active asset.

Application in these circumstances

The arrangements entered into under the Agreement indicate that the users of the Storage Units do not have the right to exclusive possession of the Storage Units but rather only the right to enter and use the storage space for certain purposes. This right is unassignable. The Taxpayer can relocate the Storers to another Storage Unit in certain circumstances and the Taxpayer may enter the storage space using all necessary force without the consent of the Storer in certain circumstances. There is also no indication of any intention to grant a lease. Other services are provided to the users of the storage facility.

In the circumstances it is considered that a tenant/landlord relationship does not exist between the parties and therefore the amounts received are not rent. Accordingly, the storage facility is not excluded by paragraph 152-40(4)(e) of the ITAA 1997 and is an active asset under section 152-40 of the ITAA 1997.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).