Disclaimer You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of private advice
Authorisation Number: 1052225006717
Date of advice: 22 February 2024
Ruling
Subject: CGT - deceased estate
Question
Will the Commissioner exercise the discretion under section 118-195 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) to allow an extension of time to dispose of the ownership interest in the property (the Property) and disregard the capital gain made on the disposal?
Answer
Yes. Having considered your circumstances and the relevant factors the Commissioner will allow an extension of time. Further information about the Commissioner's discretion can be found by searching ato.gov.au for 'QC 66057'.
This ruling applies for the following period:
Year ended 30 June 20XX
The scheme commenced on:
1 July 20XX
Relevant facts and circumstances
The deceased passed away several years ago.
The property was the main residence of the deceased.
The property was purchased by the deceased a number of years ago.
The property was less than 2 hectares.
The property was never used to produce income.
The property settled in a previous year.
The reasons for the delay in selling are as follows:
There was inaction by the original executor who eventually surrendered the role as executor.
The original executor allowed the estate to fall into arears in terms of rates loans etc.
The original executor surrendered their role a couple of years after the date of death.
The original executor took legal action against the estate and attempted to lodge a caveat over the estate which was denied.
The deceased's child attempted to replace the original executor without success a few months after the date of death.
The deceased's child was successful in obtaining administration from the court in the year that the original executor surrendered their role.
The child then needed to work out what needed doing with the estate.
Shortly after surrendering their role as executor, the original executor attempted to make a claim on the estate which was denied.
The former executor attempts legal action again a short time after the first attempt.
The child then meets with the real estate agent to look at putting all the properties on the market.
Debts needed to be collected from tenants.
The child makes contact with the bank to try and find out what is owing.
This dealing with the banks took a long time as title location was required and the title of the main residence was lost and needed to be reissued.
The child's lawyers were assisting throughout with letters.
The property needed to be refinanced which took a long time.
The deceased's child moved into the property a few years after the date of death so they could do repairs themselves as there was no money in the estate.
The property needed repairs done before it could be sold; these related to neglect by the deceased and storm damage following death.
The repairs consisted of:
• Damaged floors, walls, curtains, windows & gates.
• Water damage that was still ongoing.
• Alarm system was fried.
• A lot of electrical parts in the house were not operational.
• No smoke detectors and only 1 RCD.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 118-195
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).