| Disclaimer You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of private advice
Authorisation Number: 1052235000225
Date of advice: 28 March 2024
Ruling
Subject: CGT - Commissioner's discretion
Question
Will the Commissioner exercise the discretion under section 118-195 of ITAA 1997 to allow an extension of time for you to dispose of your ownership interest in the dwelling and disregard the capital gain or capital loss you made on the disposal?
Answer
Yes. Having considered your circumstances and the relevant factors the Commissioner will allow an extension of time. Further information about the Commissioner's discretion can be found by searching ato.gov.au for 'QC 66057'.
This private ruling applies for the following period:
Year ending 30 June 20XX
The scheme commenced on:
1 July 20XX
Relevant facts and circumstances
The deceased passed away on XX/XX/20XX.
XXX (the deceased) passed away on XX X 20XX.
The deceased acquired a dwelling (the dwelling) prior to 20 September 1985.
The dwelling was occupied by the spouse of the deceased (person A).
Person A was subject to a financial management and guardianship order from XX XX 20XX.
Person A resided in an aged care facility with the deceased prior to passing away on XX XX 20XX.
The dwelling was the main residence of the deceased until they passed away.
The dwelling has never been used to produce assessable income.
The land area is less than 2 hectares in size.
You were appointed executor of the estate under the terms of the deceased's will.
You were also one of the beneficiaries of the estate.
The deceased was survived by a number of other beneficiaries. Two of these beneficiaries namely, Person B and Person C engaged various legal representatives in relation to the administration of the estate. The dispute arose in XX 20XX and was eventually resolved on XX XX 20XX when a caveat was removed from the title to the dwelling.
The caveat on the title to the dwelling made a potential sale to a purchaser uncertain and was considered an impediment to the sale.
The last Will of the deceased which was stored at the dwelling was also unable to be located and this caused delays in obtaining probate as complex requisitions to the estate were required to be undertaken before the grant of probate issued on XX XX 20XX.
The dwelling was damaged by vandals on xx xx 20xx. The Executor was required to install boarding at the rear of the dwelling to prevent this occurring again. This reduced the appeal of the dwelling to potential purchasers.
The asking price was reduced.
The executor accepted the only offer received and a contract was entered into xx xx 20xx.
The purchaser requested a longer than normal settlement period and this was agreed upon.
Settlement occurred a short time later.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 118-195
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 118-120(3)
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).
