Disclaimer
You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private advice

Authorisation Number: 1052252304671

Date of advice: 17 May 2024

Ruling

Subject: Rental property - repairs

Question

Will the expenditure incurred to repair part of the retaining wall, the drain and grate between the driveway and the house, part of the stormwater drainage system including the soil displacement under the house and the bracing rod be deductible as a repair as per section 25-10 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?

Answer

Yes.

Section 25-10 of the ITAA 1997 provides that you can deduct expenditure in the income year you incurred the expense, for repairs to premises that you held solely for the purpose of producing assessable income.

The works carried out focused entirely on repairing the damage caused by significant ground movement due to damaged stormwater systems, restoring the condition of the structures as a whole to their former function and mitigating further risk of slope instability.

This ruling applies for the following period:

Year ending 30 June 20XX

The scheme commenced on:

1 July 20XX

Relevant facts and circumstances

In February 20XX, you purchased an investment property (the Property).

In February 20XX, a pre-purchase standard property inspection report was received with the following conclusions:

In March 20XX, settlement of the Property occurred, and the Property was immediately rented out.

The Property has been fully tenanted since being purchased.

In November 20XX, the property was re-let, and a Code Property Entry Condition Report was prepared with no report of major damage.

In February 20XX, you hired a structural engineer who provided a structural inspection report identifying:

The report from the structural engineer suggested that remedial works / preventative measures be considered in the interest of maintaining the structural integrity of the property long-term.

In March 20XX, a carpenter provided a quote for material and labour.

The carpenter and subcontractors provided invoices for the following work:

Bricklaying

Concrete

Plumber

Carpentry

Concreting was done in 2 areas under the house where damage existed - not the whole under of the house. This was required:

•         to refill the ground where the dirt had washed away (as per report by Dolan Consulting - significant soil migration relative to footings); and

•         to mitigate further damage to soil and footings to the house from run off.

This concreting has not made these areas any more useable than they were before and has not improved the look of underneath the house.

The work done by the plumber included changing the pathway of some of the drainage piping from one side of the house to the other to assist water flow in heavy weather and the construction of 2 drainage pits to collect run off to maximise the prevention of similar issues developing in the future.

In November 20XX, the structural engineer provided a report after the work was done and found the remedial recommendations outlined in the original structural inspection report had generally been actioned appropriately to repair existing damage caused by previous ground moment and mitigate further risk of slope instability.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 25-10

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Division 43


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).