Hickman v Kent or Romney Marsh Sheepbreeders' Association
[1915] 1 Ch. 881Between: Hickman
And: Kent or Romney Marsh Sheepbreeders' Association
Judge:
Astbury J
Subject References:
COMPANY
ARTICLES
CONTRACT
Action by Member to enforce his Ordinary Rights
Arbitration Clause
Application by Company to stay
Sufficient Submission
Legislative References:
Arbitration Act, 1889 (52 & 53 Vict. c. 49) - ss. 4, 27
Companies (Consolidation) Act, 1908 (8 Edw. 7, c. 69) - s. 14, sub-s. 1
Case References:
Baker v. Yorkshire Fire and Life Assurance Co. - [1892] 1 Q. B. 144
Imperial Hydropathic Hotel Co., Blackpool v. Hampson - (1882) 23 Ch. D. 1, 13
Johnson v. Lyttle's Iron Agency - (1877) 5 Ch. D. 687, 693
Bradford Banking Co. v. Briggs - (1886) 12 App. Cas. 29, 33
Wood v. Odessa Waterworks Co. - (1889) 42 Ch. D. 636, 642
Salmon v. Quin & Axtens, Ld. - [1909] 1 Ch. 311, 318
Welton v. Saffery - [1897] A.C. 299, 315
Bisgood v. Henderson's Transvaal Estates - [1908] 1 Ch. 743, 759
Pritchard's Case - (1873) L. R. 8 Ch. 956
Melhado v. Porto Alegre Ry. Co - (1874) L. R. 9 C. P. 503
Eley v. Positive Life Assurance Co - (1876) 1 Ex. D. 20, 88
Browne v. La Trinidad - (1887) 37 Ch. D. 1
Judgment date: 31 March 1915
ORDER
The contract so made between the plaintiff and the association is also a submission in writing within the true meaning and intent of the Arbitration Act, and the order is made to stay under s. 4 and direct that the matters in dispute in this action be referred to arbitration accordingly.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).