Simmons (as liquidator of Lionel Simmons Properties Ltd) v Inland Revenue Commissioners
[1980] 2 All ER 798(Judgment by: Viscount Dilhorne)
Between: Simmons (as liquidator of Lionel Simmons Properties Ltd)
And: Inland Revenue Commissioners
Judges:
Lord Wilberforce
Viscount DilhorneLord Salmon
Lord Scarman
Lord Roskill
Subject References:
Income tax
Profits
Trading receipts
Land
Disposal
Taxpayer acquiring land for development
Acquisition for building up a portfolio of investments sufficient for the flotation of a public company
Sale of land in view of deterioration of business prospects
Whether surplus on sale taxable as taxpayer's trading receipts
Case References:
Cunliffe v Goodman - [1950] 1 All ER 720; [1950] 2 KB 237, CA; 31(2) Digest (Reissue) 641, 5217
Edwards (Inspector of Taxes) v Bairstow - [1955] 3 All ER 48; [1956] AC 14; [1955] 3 WLR 410; 36 Tax Cas 207; 34 ATC 198; [1955] TR 209; 48 R & IT 534, HL; 28(1) Digest (Reissue) 566, 2089
Sharkey (Inspector of Taxes) v Wernher - [1955] 3 All ER 493; [1956] AC 58; [1955] 3 WLR 671; 36 Tax Cas 275; 34 ATC 263; [1955] TR 277; 48 R & IT 739, HL; 28(1) Digest (Reissue) 123, 363
Judgment date: 19 June 1980
Judgment by:
Viscount Dilhorne
My Lords, giving the commissioners' conclusion that the sale of the properties in question was a sale of trading stock the most favourable consideration that I can, I am unable to find in the case stated and in their findings any justification for that conclusion.
I have had the advantage of reading in draft the speech of my noble and learned friend Lord Wilberforce. I agree with it and in my opinion, for the reasons he gives, this appeal should be allowed.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).