City of Gosnells v. Duncan

[1994] 12 WAR 437
BC9402011
Court:
Supreme Court of Western Australia

Judges: Pidgeon J
Rowland J
Anderson J

Judgment date: 3 November 1994


ORDER

In this matter the court is of the view that the judgment against the City of Gosnells must stand and the judgment against the owner of the horse, Mr Duncan, must stand, but that the judgment against the office-bearers of the club must be set aside. Dismiss Appeal 191 of 1993 brought by the first appellant. Allow appeal 186 of 1993 brought by the third appellant. Appeal 184 of 1993 so far as it relates to Mr Duncan as an office-bearer, but otherwise dismiss it in respect of Mr Duncan. The Dyers were not parties but the judgment entered against them could not stand and must be set aside.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).