Glaxosmithkline Inc v Her Majesty the Queen
[2010] FCA 201(Judgment by: Stratas JA)
Glaxosmithkline Inc
vHer Majesty the Queen
Judges:
Nadon JA
Layden-Stevenson JA
Stratas JA
Subject References:
Income Tax (Federal)
Estates and Trusts
Corporate and Commercial
Tax
Income tax
Non-residents
Withholding tax
Legislative References:
Income Tax Act, RSC 1985, c 1 (5th Supp) - Pt I; Pt XIII; s 20(1)(c)(i); s 56(2); s 67; s 69(2); s 212(2); s 214(3); s 214(3)(a); s 215(1); s 215(6); s 248(1)
Case References:
Bausch
&
Lomb Inc v Commissioner of Internal Revenue (1989) - 92 TC 525 (US TC)
Gabco Ltd v Minister of National Revenue (1968) - [1968] 2 Ex CR 511; 68 DTC 5210; [1968] CTC 313; 1968 CarswellNat 285 (Can Ex Ct)
Petro-Canada v R (2004) - 2004 FCA 158; 2004 CarswellNat 1163; 2004 CarswellNat 4267; 2004 CAF 158; 2004 DTC 6329
(sub nom Petro-Canada v Minister of National Revenue) - 319 NR 261; [2004] 3 CTC 156 (FCA)
Roche Products Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2008) - [2008] AATA 639
Safety Boss Ltd v R (2000) - 2000 CarswellNat 36; 2000 DTC 1767; [2000] 3 CTC 2497
Singleton v R (2001) - 2001 SCC 61
(sub nom Singleton v Minister of National Revenue) - 275 NR 133; (sub nom Singleton v Canada); 204 DLR (4th) 564; 2001 CarswellNat 2019; 2001 CarswellNat 2020; 2001 DTC 5533 (Eng); 2001 DTC 5545 (Fr); [2002] 1 CTC 121
(sub nom Singleton v Canada) - [2001] 2 SCR 1046 (SCC)
Other References:
Canada-United Kingdom Income Tax Convention, 1978, C.T.S. 1980/25- Article 10 1(a)
Judgment date: 26 July 2010
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).