Mcbride v Hudson

(1962) 107 CLR 604

---

(Judgment by: Mctiernan J)

Mcbride
vHudson

Court:

Judges: Dixon CJ

Mctiernan JTaylor J
Windeyer J

Case References:
Bond v Barrow Haematite Steel Co - (1902) 1 Ch 353
Bothamley v Sherson - (1875) LR 20 Eq 304
Boyd v Thornley - (1925) VLR 569
Clifford Mallam v McFie - (1912) 1 Ch 29
Dodd v Williams - (1921) 1 Ch 178
Evans v Powell - (1909) 1 Ch 784
Gage Crozier v Gutheridge - (1934) Ch 536
Hawkins Public Trustee v Shaw - (1922) 2 Ch 569
Hops v Daniell - (1911) 55 Sol Jo 633
Inglis v Gillins - (1909) 1 Ch 345
Jones v Palmer (No 2) - (1895) 2 Ch 657
Lady Langdale v Briggs - (1856) 8 De G, M & G 391; 44 ER 44; 126 LJ Ch 27
Leeming Turner v Leeming - (1912) 1 Ch 828
Little v O'Brien - (1946) 62 TLR 594; (1946) 175 LTR 406
M'Afee - (1909) 1 IR 124
Mallam v McFie - (1912) 1 Ch 29
McIntyre v McIntyre - (1914) 15 SR (NSW) 45; 31 WN 132
O'Connor Westminster Bank Ltd v O'Connor - (1948) 1 Ch 628
Paine v Countess of Warwick - (1914) 2 KB 486
Porter v Porter - (1930) 31 SR (NSW) 115; 48 WN 17
Ritchie v Trustees Executors and Agency Co Ltd - (1951) 84 CLR 553
Robinson v Addison - (1840) 2 Beav 515; 48 ER 1281
Rose Midland Bank Executor and Trustee Co Ltd v Rose - (1949) 1 Ch 78
Rose Rose v Inland Revenue Commissioners - (1952) 1 Ch 499
Thornley v Boyd - (1925) 36 CLR 526
Turner v Leeming - (1912) 1 Ch 828
Warwick v Willcocks - (1921) 2 Ch 327
Webb v Australian Deposit and Mortgage Bank Ltd - (1910) 11 CLR 223
Willcocks Warwick v Willcocks - (1921) 2 Ch 327

Hearing date: 26 and 27 September 1961
Judgment date: 9 February 1962

---

Judgment by:
Mctiernan J

In my opinion the decisions which the learned primary judge Brazel J gave on the questions raised by the notice of appeal are correct. The decision on each question, in my opinion, proceeds from a correct interpretation of the will and is supported by the cases cited by the learned judge relevant thereto. I find it unnecessary to add anything to his Honour's reasoning. The appeal, in my opinion, should be dismissed.