Loizos v. Carlton and United Breweries Ltd
117 FLR 3594 NTR 31
(Judgment by: Angel J) Court:
Judges:
Kearney J
Angel JMildren J
Judgment date: 25 February 1994
Darwin
Judgment by:
Angel J
I agree that the appeal should be dismissed. I agree that s 189(2) of the Act operates so as to preclude any claim under the Act for weekly benefits prior to 1 January 1987. I agree with Kearney J as to the meaning of the words "immediately before'' in s 65(3) of the Act.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).
