Burnes v Trade Credits Ltd
34 ALR 459Between: Burnes
And: Trade Credits Ltd
Judges:
Lord Diplock
Lord Simon of Glaisdale
Lord Edmund-Davies
Lord Keith of Kinkel
Lord Scarman
Subject References:
Deed of guarantee
Construction of
'Advance'
'Further advance'
Judgment date: 4 March 1981
London
The due date for payment of a mortgage having passed without payment being made, the respondent mortgagee, on 25 November 1975, entered into a memorandum of variation of the mortgage. This provided for an increase in the rate of interest payable under the mortgage and for an extension of the term of the mortgage for one year. The appellant (guarantor of the mortgagor's obligations) was not asked to and did not consent to this variation.
The mortgagor defaulted in payment of interest under the mortgage as varied, and on 16 June 1976 the respondent commenced proceedings against the appellant guarantor claiming payment of interest then due and unpaid.
Held: Nothing in the guarantee required the guarantors to undertake, without their specific consent, liability for such increased interest as the mortgagor and the mortgagee might subsequently agree upon. The words "further advance" in the guarantee referred to the furnishing of an additional principal sum, not the extension of time for repayment of an original advance.
Payton v Brookes (SG) & Sons Pty Ltd [1977] WAR 91 , distinguished.
Appeal
This was an appeal from the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales reversing the decision of the District Court in favour of the appellant.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).