Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Munro; British Imperial Oil Co Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation

38 CLR 153
1926 - 0825A - HCA

(Judgment by: Rich J)

Between: Federal Commissioner of Taxation
And: Munro
Between: British Imperial Oil Co Ltd
And: Federal Commissioner of Taxation

Court:
High Court of Australia

Judges: Knox CJ
Isaacs J
Higgins J

Rich J
Starke J

Subject References:
Taxation and revenue
Income tax
Judicial power
Appeal
High Court
Judicial power of Commonwealth
Validity of constitution of Board of Review
Deductions
Interest on mortgage debt

Legislative References:
Constitution (Cth) - s 55; s 71
Income Tax Assessment Act 1922 (Cth) - the Act
Income Tax Assessment Act 1923 (Cth) - the Act
Income Tax Assessment Act 1925 (Cth) - the Act

Hearing date: 10 May 1926; 11 May 1926; 12 May 1926; 14 May 1926; 17 May 1926; 25 August 1926; 31 May 1926; 25 August 1926
Judgment date: 25 August 1926

MELBOURNE


Judgment by:
Rich J

I concur in the opinion that the Acts attacked in these cases are valid. As I was a party to the decision in the British Imperial Oil Co's Case, [F66] I think it right to state that I adhere to that decision. In Munro's Case I agree that the Commissioner arrived at the right conclusion and that the appeal should be allowed. In the British Imperial Oil Co's Case I answer the questions submitted as follows:

(1)
No;
(2)
Yes.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).