Case H16
Members: JL Burke ChRE O'Neill M
CF Fairleigh QC
Tribunal:
No. 1 Board of Review
R.E. O'Neill (Member):
For the reasons given by my colleagues I agree that the Commissioner's decision on the objection must be upheld notwithstanding the fact that the value of the group of companies looked at as one unit was the same before and after completion of the sales by the objector company to its parent companies (A Pty. Ltd. and B Pty. Ltd.) of the shares it had in D Pty. Ltd. This anomaly in the operation of the law is evidenced also by the decision of this Board, as then constituted, in
9 T.B.R.D.
Case
J70 where the facts were in substance the same.
Disclaimer and notice of copyright applicable to materials provided by CCH Australia Limited
CCH Australia Limited ("CCH") believes that all information which it has provided in this site is accurate and reliable, but gives no warranty of accuracy or reliability of such information to the reader or any third party. The information provided by CCH is not legal or professional advice. To the extent permitted by law, no responsibility for damages or loss arising in any way out of or in connection with or incidental to any errors or omissions in any information provided is accepted by CCH or by persons involved in the preparation and provision of the information, whether arising from negligence or otherwise, from the use of or results obtained from information supplied by CCH.
The information provided by CCH includes history notes and other value-added features which are subject to CCH copyright. No CCH material may be copied, reproduced, republished, uploaded, posted, transmitted, or distributed in any way, except that you may download one copy for your personal use only, provided you keep intact all copyright and other proprietary notices. In particular, the reproduction of any part of the information for sale or incorporation in any product intended for sale is prohibited without CCH's prior consent.
