Case K9
Members:HP Stevens Ch
RE O'Neill M
CF Fairleigh QC
Tribunal:
No. 1 Board of Review
H.P. Stevens (Chairman): I have had the opportunity of reading the reasons of my colleague, Mr. Fairleigh, and, as I am in agreement with the conclusion reached by him, it is strictly unnecessary for me to say anything further. However a brief comment might not be out of place on one particular matter.
2. The taxpayer in his submissions stressed a point that had been made in his grounds of objection, viz., that because he grew vegetables, etc., he was a primary producer. In layman's terms this is correct in the sense that without his efforts there would have been no vegetables, etc., produced. Unfortunately the mere fact of ``producing'' vegetables and fruits does not satisfy the respective provisions of the Income Tax Assessment Act - if it did every home gardener would be a primary producer. What is required is that a taxpayer carry on a ``business'' of primary production. One of the elements to be considered in determining whether a business is being carried on is whether the activities concerned could reasonably ever be expected to result in a profit. Here, despite over 20 years of operations, a profit has never been made nor is one in expectation.
ATC 99
3. As a result, whilst I can appreciate the taxpayer's view that he is a ``primary producer'', I cannot, after a consideration of the evidence as a whole, reach the conclusion that he was carrying on a business of primary production. Accordingly I would uphold the Commissioner's decisions on the objections at issue and confirm the assessments for the years ended 30 June 1973 and 1974 respectively.
Disclaimer and notice of copyright applicable to materials provided by CCH Australia Limited
CCH Australia Limited ("CCH") believes that all information which it has provided in this site is accurate and reliable, but gives no warranty of accuracy or reliability of such information to the reader or any third party. The information provided by CCH is not legal or professional advice. To the extent permitted by law, no responsibility for damages or loss arising in any way out of or in connection with or incidental to any errors or omissions in any information provided is accepted by CCH or by persons involved in the preparation and provision of the information, whether arising from negligence or otherwise, from the use of or results obtained from information supplied by CCH.
The information provided by CCH includes history notes and other value-added features which are subject to CCH copyright. No CCH material may be copied, reproduced, republished, uploaded, posted, transmitted, or distributed in any way, except that you may download one copy for your personal use only, provided you keep intact all copyright and other proprietary notices. In particular, the reproduction of any part of the information for sale or incorporation in any product intended for sale is prohibited without CCH's prior consent.