Case P51

Judges: HP Stevens Ch
JR Harrowell M

BR Pape M

Court:
No. 1 Board of Review

Judgment date: 18 June 1982.

B.R. Pape (Member)

I have had the advantage of reading the reasons for decision of the Chairman, Mr. H.P. Stevens. I agree with his findings of fact and his conclusion.

2. As far as the notice of grounds of objection is concerned, the first ground refers to the surplus received on the disposal of the property. This surplus was calculated to be $65,065 and hence, in my opinion, the Commissioner's attention was not drawn to any contention by the taxpayer that a part of this ``surplus'' being an amount of $32,532 was not derived during the year ended 30 June 1974.

3. However I would also add that even if it could be found that the taxpayer did not dispose of the properties in question in the ordinary course of carrying on its business of property development, the sale price of $136,540 falls to be included in its assessable income for the year ended 30 June 1973 by virtue of the operation of sec 36(1) of the Act. In this respect the taxpayer had classified these properties as trading stock in the various returns of income which it lodged with the Commissioner. Moreover it included in its 1972 return of income the basis it used for the valuation of its trading stock (Sch. 11) in compliance with sec. 31(1) of the Act (see Exhibit 3). Here again the grounds of objection taken by the taxpayer would not in my opinion traverse the Commissioner's contention that the profit of $32,532 was properly included in the assessable income for the year ended 30 June 1974.

4. I would uphold the Commissioner's decisions and confirm the assessment of primary tax and the assessment of Div. 7 tax.

Claim disallowed


 

Disclaimer and notice of copyright applicable to materials provided by CCH Australia Limited

CCH Australia Limited ("CCH") believes that all information which it has provided in this site is accurate and reliable, but gives no warranty of accuracy or reliability of such information to the reader or any third party. The information provided by CCH is not legal or professional advice. To the extent permitted by law, no responsibility for damages or loss arising in any way out of or in connection with or incidental to any errors or omissions in any information provided is accepted by CCH or by persons involved in the preparation and provision of the information, whether arising from negligence or otherwise, from the use of or results obtained from information supplied by CCH.

The information provided by CCH includes history notes and other value-added features which are subject to CCH copyright. No CCH material may be copied, reproduced, republished, uploaded, posted, transmitted, or distributed in any way, except that you may download one copy for your personal use only, provided you keep intact all copyright and other proprietary notices. In particular, the reproduction of any part of the information for sale or incorporation in any product intended for sale is prohibited without CCH's prior consent.