Case P103
Judges:MB Hogan Ch
P Gerber M
GW Beck M
Court:
No. 3 Board of Review
M.B. Hogan (Chairman)
I am grateful to Dr. Gerber for his detailed exposition of the facts and his separate consideration of each head of claim advanced. I agree with my colleague in the conclusions he has reached in respect of the general claim and the individual heads of claim.
2. For myself I would add only a general observation arising from what the Board was told in relation to the ex-officio appointment of country magistrates by Executive Council to the position of chairman of the local Hospital Board, and, in those towns where such instrumentalities exist, to the position of chairman of the local board of the Sugar Cane Prices Board. It appears clear to me that the performance of duties of the positions of chairman of boards to which the magistrate may be appointed ex-officio by Executive Council are to be seen as ``part and parcel of the employment'' of the taxpayer,
vide Helsham
J. (as he then was) in
F.C. of T.
v.
White
75 ATC 4018
at p. 4022
. Thus expenditure arising from the carrying out of these ex-officio duties, ``the objective necessity'' which arises from ``the nature of the office itself'', would to the extent that the expenditure remains unreimbursed by the board or authority, be an allowable deduction, per
Smith
J. in
Burton
v.
F.C. of T.
79 ATC 4318
at p. 4323
. The evidence here, such as it is, indicates only in very round terms that the ``necessity'' for the expenditure arose ``from the personal circumstances or personal preferences of the taxpayer'' and that, as
Smith
J. pointed out (at p. 4323), ``is not enough''. It appears to me that the necessity for the whole of the expenditures in dispute, insofar as they have been particularised, can be seen to arise either from the personal circumstances of the taxpayer's feeling obliged to maintain a higher than average level of social standing because of his position or, in some minor instances, from the taxpayer's own personal preferences.
3. I would confirm the Commissioner's assessment in this reference.
Disclaimer and notice of copyright applicable to materials provided by CCH Australia Limited
CCH Australia Limited ("CCH") believes that all information which it has provided in this site is accurate and reliable, but gives no warranty of accuracy or reliability of such information to the reader or any third party. The information provided by CCH is not legal or professional advice. To the extent permitted by law, no responsibility for damages or loss arising in any way out of or in connection with or incidental to any errors or omissions in any information provided is accepted by CCH or by persons involved in the preparation and provision of the information, whether arising from negligence or otherwise, from the use of or results obtained from information supplied by CCH.
The information provided by CCH includes history notes and other value-added features which are subject to CCH copyright. No CCH material may be copied, reproduced, republished, uploaded, posted, transmitted, or distributed in any way, except that you may download one copy for your personal use only, provided you keep intact all copyright and other proprietary notices. In particular, the reproduction of any part of the information for sale or incorporation in any product intended for sale is prohibited without CCH's prior consent.
