Commonwealth v Bogle

89 CLR 229
Court:
High Court of Australia

Judges: Dixon CJ
McTiernan J
Williams J
Webb J
Fullagar J
Kitto J
Taylor J

Judgment date: 13 March 1953


ORDER

ORDER

Commonwealth of Australia and Commonwealth Hostels Ltd v Bogle -

Questions answered-

1 (a) No.

(b) Yes.

2. Unnecessary to answer.

3. The effect of the Prices Regulation Act 1948 is to make illegal any contract by the defendant to pay to the plaintiff company the amounts claimed. The case does not disclose any relevant contract between the defendant and the plaintiff Commonwealth.

4. No.

5. No.

6. See answer to question 3.

7. The Court has jurisdiction in the action.

Case remitted to Kitto J. Costs of case stated to be dealt with by Kitto J.

Commonwealth of Australia and Commonwealth Hostels Ltd v Clark ; Commonwealth of Australia and Commonwealth Hostels Ltd v Boreham :

Questions answered:

1. (a) No.

(b) Yes.

2. Unnecessary to answer.

3. The effect of the Prices Regulation Act 1948 is to make illegal any contract by the defendant to pay to the plaintiff company the amounts claimed. The case does not disclose any relevant contract between the defendant and the plaintiff Commonwealth.

4. No.

5. See answer to question 3.

6. The Court has jurisdiction in the action.

Case remitted to Kitto J. Costs of case stated to be dealt with by Kitto J.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).