Supplementary Explanatory Memorandum
(Circulated by authority of the Treasurer, the Hon Peter Costello, MP)GENERAL OUTLINE
The Bill makes amendments to the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 to address the implications of a recent decision of the Federal Court in Foster v Attorney-General , 12 October 1998, which has serious implications for government administration.
In that case the Court found that section 19 of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 does not enable the Attorney-General to authorise the Minister for Justice to exercise statutory powers for and on his behalf. This decision has significant ramifications for other authorisations made under section 19 of the Act.
The Bill provides for a Minister to authorise a non-portfolio Minister or a Parliamentary Secretary to act on his or her behalf. The proposed amendments would validate past authorisations, whether oral or written, given to another Minister or to a Parliamentary Secretary.
The proposed amendments also amend the Bill to provide that authorisations given to both Ministers and Parliamentary Secretaries must be in writing. This will ensure that it is easier to ascertain the decision maker when seeking to review or challenge an administrative decision.
This will reduce the flexibility for Ministerial authorisations, however section 19 will still be available to make urgent authorisations. Even under the Foster decision, section 19 can be used to deal with circumstances in which a Minister was temporarily unavailable to perform duties. In addition Cabinet and the Prime Minister would still have power to authorise a Minister to exercise power on behalf of another Minister, as recognised by the decision in the Foster case.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).
