Taxation Determination
TD 93/180
Income tax: capital gains: how is the removal of a building from a block of land that does not amount to a loss or destruction, treated for CGT purposes ?
This version is no longer current. Please follow this link to view the current version. |
-
Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this ruling.This ruling contains references to repealed provisions, some of which may have been rewritten. The ruling still has effect. Paragraph 32 in TR 2006/10 provides further guidance on the status and binding effect of public rulings where the law has been repealed or repealed and rewritten. The legislative references at the end of the ruling indicate the repealed provisions and, where applicable, the rewritten provisions.This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.
FOI status:
may be releasedFOI number: I 1216114This Determination, to the extent that it is capable of being a 'public ruling' in terms of Part IVAAA of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 , is a public ruling for the purposes of that Part. Taxation Ruling TR 92/1 explains when a Determination is a public ruling and how it is binding on the Commissioner. Unless otherwise stated, this Determination applies to years commencing both before and after its date of issue. However, this Determination does not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of a settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of the Determination (see paragraphs 21 and 22 of Taxation Ruling TR 92/20). |
1. The removal of a building from a block of land is not a disposal of any asset because, at that time, there is no change in ownership of either the land or the building. Rather, the original asset has been split into two separate assets (the land and the building).
2. In the event of a subsequent separate disposal of the land and building, the respective cost bases are determined in accordance with subsection 160ZH(12) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936. That is, where the original asset was acquired post-CGT, its cost base immediately before the removal is apportioned between the split assets.
Example:
Land with a building attached is purchased in 1987. In 1992, the building is relocated to another site.
For CGT purposes, there is no disposal arising from the removal of the building.
The cost base of the original asset is apportioned between the land and the building.
Commissioner of Taxation
9/9/93
Previously issued as Draft TD 93/D75
References
ATO references:
NO TD/92/0026/PAR (CGTDET 58)
Related Rulings/Determinations:
TD 7;
TD 93/79 ;
TD 93/181;
TD 93/182;
TD 93/183;
TD 93/184
Subject References:
Apportionment;
disposal of an asset;
removal of a building from land;
split assets
Legislative References:
ITAA 160ZH(12)
Date: | Version: | Change: | |
9 September 1993 | Original ruling | ||
You are here | 29 November 2006 | Original ruling + note | Repeal provision note |
21 April 2010 | Consolidated ruling | Addendum |
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).