Taxation Determination

TD 93/212

Income tax: Offshore Banking Units (OBU) - are salaries and other operating expenses that are paid from non-OB money taken into account for purposes of the 'purity test' in section 121EH where the expenses are incurred in undertaking OB activities?

This version is no longer current. Please follow this link to view the current version.

  • Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this ruling.
    This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.

FOI status:

may be releasedFOI number: I 1216463

This Determination, to the extent that it is capable of being a 'public ruling' in terms of Part IVAAA of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 , is a public ruling for the purposes of that Part. Taxation Ruling TR 92/1 explains when a Determination is a public ruling and how it is binding on the Commissioner. Unless otherwise stated, this Determination applies to years commencing both before and after its date of issue. However, this Determination does not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of a settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of the Determination (see paragraphs 21 and 22 of Taxation Ruling TR 92/20).

1. No. The purity test which provides for the loss of the concessional tax treatment where more than 10% of an OBU's assessable OB income is derived from the use of non-OB money is only applicable where the use of non-OB money is in respect of OB activities of the OBU as set out in section 121D of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 .

2. It is clear that the words 'money lent, invested or otherwise used in carrying on the activities ...' in subsection 121EE(2) and the words 'lending, investing or other use ...' in section 121EH both refer to OB activities undertaken with the purpose of deriving assessable income.

3. The expenses incurred in undertaking OB activities, would of course, be 'allowable OB deductions' and be subject to possible apportionment in terms of section 121EF.

Example

An OBU which has just been established has derived fee income of $100 000 for advisory activities in terms of subsection 121D(7). The OBU did not receive a capital injection and it has not borrowed any funds from an offshore person. Accordingly all of its working capital is non-OB money.
The OBU incurred operating expenses of $20 000 which exclusively related to the OB activity.
The whole of the $100 000 is assessable OB income in terms of subsection 121EE(2) and none of the money that has been expended has been lent, invested or otherwise used in carrying on the activities of the OBU. The OBU must treat the expenses, however, as an exclusive OB deduction of $20 000 from its assessable OB income.
Assuming no other activities have taken place at this point of time the OBU has what is, essentially OB money of $100 000 - that is, none of this money is non-OB money.

Commissioner of Taxation
28/10/93

Previously issued as Draft TD 93/D207

References

ATO references:
NO NAT 93/3707-5

ISSN 1038 - 8982

Subject References:
Offshore banking,
OBUs,
purity test

Legislative References:
ITAA Pt III Div 9A;
ITAA 121EH

TD 93/212 history
  Date: Version: Change:
You are here 28 October 1993 Original ruling  
  13 October 2021 Consolidated ruling Addendum

Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).