Taxation Determination
TD 93/51
Income tax: is it always necessary for a retailer to make a police complaint before taking into account stock shortages for working out the value of trading stock on hand under subsection 28(1)?
This version is no longer current. Please follow this link to view the current version. |
-
Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this ruling.This ruling contains references to repealed provisions, some of which may have been rewritten. The ruling still has effect. Paragraph 32 in TR 2006/10 provides further guidance on the status and binding effect of public rulings where the law has been repealed or repealed and rewritten. The legislative references at the end of the ruling indicate the repealed provisions and, where applicable, the rewritten provisions.This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.
FOI status:
may be releasedFOI number: I 1214490This Determination, to the extent that it is capable of being a 'public ruling' in terms of Part IVAAA of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 , is a public ruling for the purposes of that Part. Taxation Ruling TR 92/1 explains when a Determination is a public ruling and how it is binding on the Commissioner. Unless otherwise stated, this Determination applies to years commencing both before and after its date of issue. However, this Determination does not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of a settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of the Determination (see paragraphs 21 and 22 of Taxation Ruling TR 92/20). |
1. No. A police complaint is only one form of evidence of a stock shortage.
2. Where there is sufficient evidence establishing the shortage, the retailer is not required, under subsection 28(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, to bring the missing items into the closing stock figure.
Example:
Grant is the owner of a jewellery store. After a physical stocktake and a comparison with inventory records, he discovers several jewellery items are missing. It is not the normal industry practice to report the shortage to the police where the circumstances of the loss are unknown. Accordingly a police report will not be required. Grant will not be required to include the missing items in his closing stock.
Commissioner of Taxation
25/3/93
Previously issued as Draft TD 92/D190
References
ATO references:
NO TOW11
Subject References:
closing stock;
jeweller;
jewellery;
losses;
police complaint;
retail trade;
retailer;
stock shortage;
substantiation;
theft;
trading stock on hand
Legislative References:
ITAA 28(1)
Date: | Version: | Change: | |
25 March 1993 | Original ruling | ||
You are here | 29 November 2006 | Original ruling + note | Repeal provision note |
6 April 2011 | Withdrawn |
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).