Taxation Determination
TD 95/54
Income tax: capital gains: does a person who acquires the benefit of a restrictive covenant incur a capital loss on the expiry of that covenant?
-
Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this ruling.This ruling contains references to repealed provisions, some of which may have been rewritten. The ruling still has effect. Paragraph 32 in TR 2006/10 provides further guidance on the status and binding effect of public rulings where the law has been repealed or repealed and rewritten. The legislative references at the end of the ruling indicate the repealed provisions and, where applicable, the rewritten provisions.This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.
FOI status:
may be releasedFOI number: I 1014637This Determination, to the extent that it is capable of being a 'public ruling' in terms of Part IVAAA of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 , is a public ruling for the purposes of that Part. Taxation Ruling TR 92/1 explains when a Determination is a public ruling and how it is binding on the Commissioner. Unless otherwise stated, this Determination applies to years commencing both before and after its date of issue. However, this Determination does not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of a settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of the Determination (see paragraphs 21 and 22 of Taxation Ruling TR 92/20). |
1. Yes, provided that the benefit of the restrictive covenant does not form part of goodwill on the sale of a business.
2. Subsection 160M(6B) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 applies to deem the person who acquires the restrictive covenant to do so when the covenant is granted.
3. The reduced cost base under subsection 160ZH(3) is the amount paid for the restrictive covenant.
4. On expiry of the restrictive covenant, a change in ownership is taken to have occurred (paragraph 160M(3)(b)), resulting in a disposal for nil consideration. On expiry the covenant, no longer being enforceable, has nil market value for the purposes of the deemed market value rules. This results in a capital loss equal to the amount paid for the restrictive covenant. The capital loss is incurred on the change in the ownership of the benefit (subsection 160U(4)), i.e., when the covenant expires.
Commissioner of Taxation
27/9/95
Previously issued as Draft TD 95/D4
References
ATO references:
NO 95/2836-9
Related Rulings/Determinations:
TR 95/3
Subject References:
capital loss
expiry
goodwill
restrictive covenant
Legislative References:
ITAA 160M(3)(b)
ITAA 160M(6)(b)
ITAA 160M(6B)
ITAA 160M(6B)(a)
ITAA 160U(4)
ITAA 160U(6)(a)(i)
ITAA 160U(6)(b)(i)
ITAA 160ZH(3)
Date: | Version: | Change: | |
27 September 1995 | Original ruling | ||
You are here | 29 November 2006 | Original ruling + note | Repeal provision note |
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).