Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1012318067986

    This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

    Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet.

Ruling

Subject: Non-commercial losses

Question:

Will the Commissioner exercise the discretion in paragraph 35-55(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997 to allow you to include any losses from your business activity in your calculation of taxable income for the 2010-11 financial years?

Answer:

No

This ruling applies for the following period

Year ended 30 June 2011

The scheme commenced on

15 October 2002

Relevant facts and circumstances

You satisfy the <$250,000 income requirement set out in subsection 35-10(2E) of the ITAA 1997.

You carry on a business which you commenced in 2002.

You are paid by contract upon the completion of work.

You incurred losses in relation to costs associated with your business and professional development

You made $20,000 in assessable income in the 2011-12 financial year.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 35-10(1)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
subsection 35-10(2)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
subsection 35-10(2E)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 paragraph 35-55(1)(b)

Reasons for decision

For the 2009-10 and later financial years, Division 35 of the ITAA 1997 will apply to defer a non-commercial loss from a business activity unless:

    · you meet the income requirement and you pass one of the four tests;

    · the exceptions apply; or

    · the Commissioner exercises his discretion.

In your situation, none of the exceptions would apply and although you satisfy the income requirement, you do not meet any of the four tests in the years of income under consideration. Your losses are therefore subject to the deferral rule, unless the Commissioner exercises his discretion.

The relevant discretion may be exercised for the income year in question where:

    · it is in the nature of the business activity that there will be a period of time before it can be expected to pass one of the four tests; and

    · there is an objective expectation your business activity will produce a tax profit or meet one of the four tests within a commercially viable period for your industry.

Having regard to your full circumstances, it is not accepted that it is in the nature of the business activity that has prevented one of the four tests being passed.

This discretion is intended to cover a business activity where there is an inherent period of time between the commencement of the activity and the production of assessable income. For example, an activity involving the planting of hardwood trees for harvest, where many years would pass before the activity could reasonably be expected to produce income.

For the discretion to be applied there needs to be an inherent or innate feature of the activity resulting in an inability to produce income in the year of commencement and (in most cases) a number of years thereafter. Further examples that fall into this category are forestry, viticulture and certain horticultural activities.

The note above does not support any view that the discretion should be exercised for any start-up activity that is yet, for example, to satisfy the assessable income test in section 35-30 of the ITAA 1997, simply because of the small scale on which it was started, or because a client base is being built up.

In your case you commenced business as an author in 2002. You have not provided any independent evidence as to the lead time in your industry. However, as you commenced business over ten years ago it stands to reason that the lead time for your industry has elapsed. The lead time for your business does not restart with each new project and is calculated from the commencement of your activity. Consequently the Commissioner will not exercise his discretion for 2010-11 financial year.

Please note we have only ruled for the 2010-11 financial year as you do not require the discretion in the 2011-12 financial year as you pass the income requirement and the assessable income test.