Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your written advice
Authorisation Number: 1012829249189
Date of advice: 26 June 2015
Ruling
Subject: Residency
Question and answer
Are you a resident of Australia for taxation purposes?
Yes.
This ruling applies for the following periods:
Year ended 30 June 2014
The scheme commenced on:
1 July 2013
Relevant facts and circumstances
This ruling is based on the facts stated in the description of the scheme that is set out below. If your circumstances are materially different from these facts, this ruling has no effect and you cannot rely on it. The fact sheet has more information about relying on your private ruling.
You were born in country A.
You are an Australian citizen.
You left Australia to travel to country B then country C for work.
You have a working visa to enter country B and country C.
Your intention was to go to country B and country C for work and return to Australia permanently.
You were living in Australia permanently in your family home prior to your departure.
You returned to Australia over 5 times to visit family while working in country C.
You lived in accommodation provided by your employer in country C.
You do not have any assets in country C.
Your family did not accompany you to country C.
Your spouse and children remained living in your family home while you worked in country C.
Your family remained in Australia as your contract did not allow for them to join you, it was a single appointment contract.
You and your spouse have never been a Commonwealth Government of Australia Employee.
When completing the Australian Immigration outgoing passenger card you stated your reason for going overseas as 'Australian resident departing temporarily'.
Relevant legislative provisions:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 6-5
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 subsection 6(1)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 995-1(1).
Reasons for decision
Section 6-5 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) provides that where you are a resident of Australia for taxation purposes, your assessable income includes income gained from all sources, whether in or out of Australia. However, where you are a foreign resident, your assessable income includes only income derived from an Australian source.
The terms resident and resident of Australia, in regard to an individual, are defined in subsection 6(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936.
The definition offers four tests to ascertain whether each individual taxpayer is a resident of Australia for income tax purposes. These tests are the:
• resides test
• domicile and permanent place of abode test
• 183 day test and
• Commonwealth superannuation fund test.
The primary test for deciding the residency status of each individual is whether they reside in Australia according to the ordinary meaning of the word resides. If the primary test is satisfied the remaining three tests do not need to be considered as residency for Australian tax purposes has been established.
The resides (ordinary concepts) test
The outcomes of several Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) cases have determined that the word 'resides' should be given the widest meaning and there have been a number of factors identified which can assist in determining if a particular taxpayer is a resident of Australia under this test.
Recent case law decisions have considered the following factors in relation to whether the taxpayer was a resident under the 'resides' test:
(i) Physical presence in Australia
(ii) Nationality
(iii) History of residence and movements
(iv) Habits and "mode of life"
(v) Frequency, regularity and duration of visits to Australia
(vi) Purpose of visits to or absences from Australia
(vii) Family and business ties to different countries
(viii) Maintenance of place of abode.
These factors are similar to those which the Commissioner has said are relevant in determining the residency status of individuals in IT 2650 and Taxation Ruling TR 98/17 Income tax: residency status of individuals entering Australia.
It is important to note that not one single factor is decisive and the weight given to each factor depends on individual circumstances.
You were born in the country A.
You are an Australian citizen.
You went to country C for work purposes.
You have a family home in Australia.
Your spouse and children remained in Australia while you worked in country C.
Based on the facts above you were residing in Australia according to ordinary concepts for the period you were in country C.
In the recent case of Iyengar v FCT 2011 ATC 10-222, the Administrative Appeals Tribunal held that the taxpayer was a resident of Australia, even though he was working overseas. The taxpayer's family ties, his intention (to complete his contract) and motive (to pay off his mortgage), and his maintaining an Australian place of abode while working overseas, were all indicative that he was an Australian resident during the relevant period.
In your case you went to country C for work purposes. Your spouse and children remained in Australia.
In your case you chose to accept a job outside Australia in country C which was your reason for being in country C and you therefore remain a resident of Australia for taxation purposes.
You maintained your family home in Australia while you were overseas.
Whilst it is not necessary to meet more than one test to determine residency for tax purposes (we have already established that you are a resident under the resides test), we will also include a discussion of the 'domicile and permanent place of abode' test as an alternative argument.
The domicile test
If a person's domicile is Australia they will be an Australian resident unless the Commissioner is satisfied they have a permanent place of abode outside of Australia.
A person's domicile is generally their country of birth. This is known as a person's 'domicile of origin'. In order to show that an individual's domicile of choice has been adopted, the person must be able to prove an intention to make his or her home indefinitely in that country.
Your domicile of origin is the country A and your domicile of choice is Australia.
The expression 'place of abode' refers to a person's residence, where they live with their family and sleep at night. In essence, a person's place of abode is that person's dwelling place or the physical surroundings in which a person lives.
A permanent place of abode does not have to be 'everlasting' or 'forever'. It does not mean an abode in which a person intends to live for the rest of his or her life. An intention to return to Australia in the foreseeable future to live does not prevent the taxpayer in the meantime setting up a permanent place of abode elsewhere.
The Commissioner is not satisfied that you set up a permanent place of abode outside Australia for the following reasons:
• You are a citizen of Australia.
• Your spouse and children did not accompany you to country C.
• You had a home in Australia to return to.
You are a resident under this test.
Your residency status
You were a resident of Australia for taxation purposes for the period you were outside Australia for work and recreation.
As you are resident of Australia for tax purposes you must pay tax on all Australian and international income.