ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2007/112

Income Tax

Capital Allowances: business related costs - could not be taken into account in working out a capital gain or loss from a CGT event
FOI status: may be released

CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

Does paragraph 40-880(5)(f) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) apply so as to reduce the taxpayer's deduction under section 40-880 of the ITAA 1997 for capital expenditure it incurred 'in relation to your business'?

Decision

No. Paragraph 40-880(5)(f) of the ITAA 1997 does not apply so as to reduce the taxpayer's deduction under section 40-880 of the ITAA 1997 for capital expenditure it incurred in relation to its business.

Facts

The taxpayer, a public company limited by shares that carried on its business wholly for a taxable purpose, was approached by an unrelated company with a proposal for them to merge. The taxpayer had not been seeking any such offers at the time that the offer was made but decided to proceed with the merger after evaluating the proposal.

The merger was implemented by a scheme of arrangement which involved the existing shares in the taxpayer being transferred from the taxpayer's members to the unrelated entity in exchange for the taxpayer's members being issued shares in the unrelated entity. The result of the arrangement was the taxpayer became a wholly owned subsidiary of the unrelated entity.

The taxpayer incurred capital expenditure on or after 1 July 2005 in respect of evaluating the merger proposal, changing its constitution to facilitate the merger, and the implementing the scheme of arrangement. The expenditure comprised legal fees; various consulting fees; member communication expenses and other related miscellaneous expenses.

The capital expenditure was incurred in relation to the taxpayer's business for the purposes of paragraph 40-880(2)(a) of the ITAA 1997.

Reasons for Decision

Section 40-880 of the ITAA 1997 allows certain business capital expenditure to be deducted in equal proportions over five income years. Paragraph 40-880(5)(f) of the ITAA 1997 provides that you cannot deduct anything under section 40-880 for an amount of expenditure you incur to the extent that 'it could, apart from this section, be taken into account in working out the amount of a capital gain or capital loss from a CGT event'.

In most cases, capital proceeds and cost base (or reduced cost base) are taken into account in working out a capital gain or capital loss from a capital gains tax (CGT) event.

The expenditure could be taken into account in capital proceeds if it reduced the capital proceeds from a CGT event. However, no CGT event happens in respect of which there are capital proceeds that are reduced by the expenditure.

The expenditure could be taken into account in cost base (or reduced cost base) if it forms part of the cost base (or reduced cost base) of a CGT asset. However, the taxpayer's expenditure does not form part the cost base (or reduced cost base) of any CGT asset.

Further, the expenditure does not fit the description of any amount that forms part of the calculation of a capital gain or loss from a CGT event that is worked out without reference to either or both capital proceeds and cost base (or reduced cost base).

For the foregoing reasons, paragraph 40-880(5)(f) of the ITAA 1997 does not apply so as to reduce the taxpayer's deduction under section 40-880 of the ITAA 1997 in respect of capital expenditure it incurred as set out in the facts.

Date of decision:  27 April 2007

Year of income:  Year ended 30 June 2006

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
   section 40-880
   paragraph 40-880(2)(a)
   paragraph 40-880(5)(f)

Related ATO Interpretative Decisions
ATO ID 2007/109
ATO ID 2007/110
ATO ID 2007/111

Keywords
Capital Allowances CoE
Capital expenditure
Capital gains tax
CGT capital proceeds
CGT cost base
CGT events
CGT reduced cost base
Losses and Capital Gains Tax CoE

Siebel/TDMS Reference Number:  5310508

Business Line:  Public Groups and International

Date of publication:  1 June 2007

ISSN: 1445-2782