ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2013/2 (Withdrawn)

Income Tax

• This ATO ID is withdrawn as the position stated in this ATO ID is currently being reviewed.
  This document has changed over time. View its history.

Issue

Is interest income derived by an Australian resident under a physical cash sweeping arrangement using funds both obtained from and derived through a foreign branch of the Australian resident, derived in carrying on business in a country outside Australia at or through a permanent establishment of the Australian resident - for the purpose of paragraph 128B(2A)(a) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936)?

Decision

Yes. The interest income is derived in carrying on business in a country outside Australia at or through the permanent establishment of the Australian resident, for the purpose of paragraph 128B(2A)(a) of the ITAA 1936.

Facts

The taxpayer is an Australian resident company that carries on business through a permanent establishment in a non tax treaty country (the foreign country).

The taxpayer maintains a bank account in the foreign country which is used for the sole purpose of paying all the operational expenses incurred through the permanent establishment.

Business activities conducted through the permanent establishment in the foreign country produce goods which are also marketed and sold through the permanent establishment.

All proceeds from the sale of these goods are deposited directly into the taxpayer's Australian bank account (the Australian bank account).

The only amounts deposited into the Australian bank account are from the sales income generated by the activities of the permanent establishment in the foreign country.

The taxpayer's income from these sales is solely attributable to the activities of its permanent establishment in the foreign country.

By way of a zero balance physical cash pooling (or cash sweeping) arrangement operating on the Australian bank account, the net balance in this Australian bank account is automatically on lent to another Australian company AusCo2.

The loan arrangement between the taxpayer and AusCo2 is entered into in Australia.

Under this loan arrangement, interest payments are made to the taxpayer by AusCo2.

Reasons for Decision

Under subsection 128B(5) of the ITAA 1936 a person is liable to interest withholding tax on income if the requirements of subsection 128B(2A) of the ITAA 1936 are satisfied in relation to that income.

Subsection 128B(2A) of the ITAA 1936 states that:

Subject to subsection (3), where income:

(a)

is, or has, after 2 July 1973, been, derived, or derived in part, by a person to whom this section applies in carrying on business in a country outside Australia at or through a permanent establishment of the person in that country; and

(b)

consists of interest that:

(i)

is or has been paid to the person by another person to whom this section applies and is not an outgoing wholly incurred by that other person in carrying on business in a country outside Australia at or through a permanent establishment of that other person in that country; or

(ii)

is or has been paid to the first-mentioned person by a person who is, or by persons each of whom is, not a resident and is, or is in part, an outgoing incurred by that last-mentioned person or those last-mentioned persons in carrying on business in Australia at or through a permanent establishment of that last-mentioned person or those last-mentioned persons in Australia;

this section also applies to that income or to the part of that income so derived, as the case may be.

Taxation Ruling TR 2001/11 deals with the operation of Australia's permanent establishment attribution rules. Paragraphs 3.16 and 3.18-3.19 of this ruling state that:

3.16 'Attributable' in this context has the same meaning as under the business profits article. The OECD Commentary on Article 7 states that the approach to the attribution test preferred by most countries focuses on where the profits are generated, that is whether they are generated through the PE. This will be so where, in substance, the resources and activities at the relevant place are the source of the profit.

3.18 Accordingly, income is attributable to activities conducted at or through a PE to the extent that those activities are, in substance, a contributing factor in generating the income or give rise to benefits from expenditure incurred.

3.19 ... In the ITAA 1936, subsection 136AE(4) refers to the derivation of income or the incurring of expenditure being attributable to activities carried on by the taxpayer at or through the PE, section 23AH refers to foreign income derived in carrying on a business at or through a PE, and subparagraph 128B(3)(h)(ii) to interest derived by a non-resident in carrying on business in Australia at or through a PE of the non-resident in Australia (similar language occurs elsewhere in section 128B). Notwithstanding this variety of expression, the same operating idea of attribution applies in these and similar cases.

Note that the word 'attributable' has been held to mean 'owing to' or 'produced by' (per Central Asbestos Co v. Dodd (1972) 2 All ER 1135, [1973] AC 518). It is synonymous with the phrases 'a contributory causal connection' per Walsh v. Rother District Council [1978] 1 All ER 510; [1978] ICR 1216 and a 'contributing cause' per the Full Federal Court in Repatriation Commission v. Law (1980) 31 ALR 140. See also paragraphs 37 and 108-109 of Taxation Ruling TR 2007/5 and paragraphs 255-258 of Taxation Ruling TR 2010/1.

As paragraph 128B(2A)(a) of the ITAA 1936 is worded sufficiently similarly to the expressions referred to in paragraph 3.19 of TR 2001/11, Australia's permanent establishment attribution rules apply equally in this instance. Therefore, consistent with paragraphs 3.18, 4.22-4.23 and 4.28-4.30 of TR 2001/11, it is necessary to determine the activities that are, in substance, a contributing or causal factor in generating the interest income - that is the economic activities that have given rise to the derivation of the interest income by the Australian resident taxpayer.

TR 2001/11 does not provide any explicit guidance on attributing interest income within an entity, but does do so in respect of interest expense. We consider that the principles in determining the attribution of interest expense are equally applicable to attributing interest income. Therefore, of relevance to this issue is paragraph 3.42 of TR 2001/11 which states that:

To the extent that funds borrowed by an entity are used in connection with the business carried on through its PE, the interest expense incurred by the entity on those borrowing's [sic] is attributable to the PE.

The economic activities of the taxpayer that have given rise to the derivation of the interest income by the taxpayer, are the production and sale of goods through the taxpayer's permanent establishment in the foreign country, and the entering into of loans to AusCo2 in Australia.

As mentioned above, the loans to AusCo2 were made under an automated (zero balance physical) cash sweeping arrangement operating on the Australian bank account.

In this case, entering into the loans in Australia is insignificant by comparison with the production and sales activities through the permanent establishment in the foreign country, which generated all of the money that was loaned by the taxpayer to AusCo2.

This money (being income from production and sales) was solely attributable to the activities of the offshore permanent establishment.

Accordingly, it is considered that the main contributing factor in generating the interest income is the activity of the permanent establishment which generated the principal from which the interest income is derived. Therefore, the interest income is derived in carrying on business in the foreign country at or through a permanent establishment of the taxpayer in that country.

In other words, consistent with paragraphs 3.18, 3.42 and 4.22- 4.23 of TR 2001/11, where funds lent by the taxpayer are generated in connection with the business carried on through its permanent establishment, the interest income derived by the taxpayer from those funds is attributable to the permanent establishment - because it is caused or produced by the economically significant activities performed by the permanent establishment.

Where none of the exceptions in section 128B of the ITAA 1936 apply and all of the requirements of subsection 128B(2A) of the ITAA 1936 are satisfied, interest payments on the loans from the taxpayer to AusCo2 will be liable for interest withholding tax.

In this regard, section 12-255 of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (TAA) requires a borrower to withhold from an interest payment on a loan where the interest is payable in Australia, but is derived by an Australian resident lender in carrying on a business through a permanent establishment in a country outside Australia. Note also that section 12-260 of Schedule 1 to the TAA requires the lender to facilitate this by giving a notice in writing to the borrower that the loan originated from a foreign branch of the lender.

Year of income:  Year ended 30 June 2012

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936
   section 128B
   subsection 128B(2A)
   paragraph 128B(2A)(a)
   subsection 128B(5)
   subsection 128B(11)

Case References:
Central Asbestos Co v Dodd
   [1972] 2 All ER 1135
   [1973] AC 518

Related Public Rulings (including Determinations)
Taxation Ruling TR 2001/11
Taxation Ruling TR 2006/9
Taxation Ruling TR 2007/5
Taxation Ruling TR 2010/1

Related ATO Interpretative Decisions
ATO ID 2006/128

Keywords
International tax
Withholding taxes
PAYG withholding under dividend, interest & royalty payment category

Business Line:  Public Groups and International

Date of publication:  4 January 2013

ISSN: 1445-2782