In most cases, you can choose to use either of 2 alternative methods for calculating depreciation:
- The prime cost method assumes that the value of a depreciating asset decreases uniformly over its effective life.
- The diminishing value method assumes that the value of a depreciating asset decreases more in the early years of its effective life.
To calculate depreciation for most assets for a particular income year you can use the Depreciation and capital allowances tool. The tool compares results of the 2 methods and also provides disposal outcomes.
This graph compares the amount you would claim under each method for the depreciation of an asset that is used only for business. The asset in this example cost $80,000, was acquired on the first day of the income year and has an effective life of 5 years.
Prime cost (straight line) method
Under the prime cost method (also known as the straight-line method), you claim a fixed amount each year based on the following formula:
Asset’s cost × (days held ÷ 365) × (100% ÷ asset’s effective life)
Note: ‘Days held’ is the number of days you held the asset in the income year in which you used it or had it installed ready for use for any purpose. Days held can be 366 for a leap year.
Example: prime cost method
If the asset costs $80,000 (after excluding GST if entitled to claim it) and has an effective life of 5 years, you can claim 20% of its cost, or $16,000, in each of the 5 years.
The cost includes the amount you paid for the asset as well as any additional amounts paid for transport, installation or making it ready to use.
The calculation is:
$80,000 × (365 ÷ 365) × 20% = $16,000
End of exampleNote that if you acquired the above asset part way through the year, the final calculation using the prime cost method should occur in the th year for the remaining portion that was not claimed in the first year.
The asset's cost includes:
- the amount you pay for it
- any additional amounts you spend on transporting it and installing it in position
- amounts you spend on improving it.
In some circumstances, such as when you change the effective life or cost of an asset, an adjusted prime cost formula must be used.
Example: depreciating asset initially used for a non-taxable purpose
Paul purchased a fridge for $2,000 on 1 July 2020 and immediately used it wholly for private purposes as a second fridge.
He started a takeaway business on 1 March 2022, moved the fridge into his business premises and began using it for his business only. Paul does not use simplified depreciation rules for his depreciating assets.
Paul’s fridge started to decline in value from 1 July 2020 as that was the day he first used it. He needs to work out the fridge’s decline in value from the date he first started using it.
However, Paul can only claim a deduction for the decline in value from 1 March 2022 when he started using it for a taxable purpose.
Paul chooses to use the prime cost method to work out the decline in value and adopts the Commissioner's effective life determination for a fridge (10 years).
The decline in value will be $2,000 x (365 ÷ 365) x (100% ÷ 10) = $200 per year.
Before 1 March 2022, when the fridge was used for private purposes, the decline in value is $333, calculated as the sum of:
- $200 for the income year from 1 July 2020 and 30 June 2021 ($2,000 x (365 ÷ 365) x (100% ÷ 10) = $200)
- $133 for the 243 days from 1 July 2021 to 28 February 2022 before he started using the fridge for a taxable purpose ($2,000 x (243 ÷ 365) x (100% ÷ 10) = $133)
Paul can't claim deductions for the $333 decline in value of the fridge for the period it was used wholly for private purposes.
He determines there are 122 days between 1 March 2022 and 30 June 2022 (inclusive) during which he used the fridge exclusively for his takeaway business.
Paul calculates his deduction for the fridge in the 2021–22 income year as follows:
$2,000 x (122 ÷ 365) x (100% ÷ 10) = $67
He will be able to claim a deduction of $67 for the decline in value for the fridge in the 2021–22 income year.
End of exampleFor help calculating the deduction available from a depreciating asset, use the Depreciation and capital allowances tool.
Diminishing value method
Under the diminishing value method, decline in value is calculated using the asset's base value. The base value of an asset is the amount you paid for the asset plus any additional amount you spent on transporting, installing and improving it, less the decline in value up to the end of the prior income year.
The diminishing value method:
- assumes the decline in value each year is a constant proportion of the amount not yet written-off
- produces a progressively smaller decline in value over time.
The following formula is used for the diminishing value method:
Base value × (days held ÷ 365) × (200% ÷ asset’s effective life)
Days held can be 366 for a leap year (see Note).
Example: diminishing value method
If the asset cost $80,000 and has an effective life of 5 years, the claim for the first year will be:
$80,000 × (365 ÷ 365) × (200% ÷ 5) = $80,000 × 40% = $32,000
The cost includes the amount you paid for the asset (excluding GST if entitled to claim it) as well as any additional amounts paid for transport, installation or making it ready to use.
The base value reduces each year by the decline in the value of the asset. This means the base value for the second year will be $48,000; that is, $80,000 minus the $32,000 decline in value in the first year.
The claim for the second year will be:
$48,000 × (365 ÷ 365) × (200% ÷ 5) = $48,000 × 40% = $19,200
In the third year, the base value will be $28,800 and the claim will be $11,520.
In the fourth year, the base value will be $17,280 and the claim will be $6,912.
This will continue until the value reaches zero.
End of exampleIf you started to hold the asset before 10 May 2006, the formula for the diminishing value method is:
Base value × (days held ÷ 365) × (150% ÷ asset’s effective life)
Effective life of the asset
The decline in value of a depreciating asset is generally based on the asset's effective life. The effective life is broadly the period it can be used by anyone for income-producing purposes. This assumes it will be:
- subject to wear and tear reasonably expected from the circumstances of use
- maintained in reasonably good order and condition.
You decide whether to:
- adopt the Commissioner's effective life determination
- self-assess the depreciating asset's effective life. We only make determinations of the effective life of new assets. If you purchase a second-hand asset where its condition justifies a shorter life than that determined by us, you can self-assess.
In some situations, you don't have a choice. For example:
- You acquire the asset from an associate such as your spouse or business partner. You must use the:
- same effective life they used (if they used the diminishing value method)
- effective life that is yet to elapse (if they used the prime cost method).
- The asset is an intangible depreciating asset, such as intellectual property. You don't have a choice as the effective life is set out in the effective life determination rules.
If you:
- use the Commissioner's effective life determinations, they won't be challenged in any audit process
- self-assess the effective life, we may ask you to explain how you worked it out.
Changing the effective life you are using
You can choose to recalculate the effective life you are using for an income year if your circumstances of use change and the effective life you have been using is no longer accurate. You can do this if you either adopted the Commissioner's effective life determination or self-assessed.
You are obliged to recalculate the effective life if you improve an asset that results in its cost increasing by 10% or more in an income year.
Reduction for non-taxable use
Irrespective of the method used, a deduction for the decline in value of a depreciating asset is reduced by the extent to which it's used for a non-taxable purpose. For example, if an asset is used 40% of the time for a private purpose, the deduction for its decline in value is reduced by 40%. Hence all figures above would be multiplied by a factor of 0.6.
Transfer to low-value pool
Once the value of the asset falls below $1,000, you can choose to transfer its remaining value to a low-value pool. By doing so, you can claim depreciation for the asset together with any other low-value assets, rather than making separate calculations for each.
Backing business investment – accelerated depreciation
For assets first held on or after 12 March 2020 and first used or installed ready for use until 30 June 2021 the Backing business investment – accelerated depreciation measure provides a time-limited investment incentive to support business investment and economic growth by accelerating depreciation deductions. The key features of the incentive are as follows:
- The benefits are either
- Deduction of 50% of the cost or opening adjustable value of an eligible asset on installation. Existing depreciation rules apply to the balance of the asset’s cost.
- Deduction of 57.5% of the cost of the asset in the first year you add the asset to the small business pool, if you are using the simplified depreciation rules for small business.
- Eligible businesses are those with aggregated turnover below $500 million.
- Eligible assets are new depreciating assets (for example, plant, equipment and specified intangible assets, such as patents). The assets must be first held, and first used or first installed ready for use for a taxable purpose on or after 12 March 2020 until 30 June 2021. Some exclusions apply, including the same asset not having received an immediate deduction under instant asset write-off or temporary full expensing.