Show download pdf controls
  • Ban on electronic sales suppression tools

    From 4 October 2018, the government has banned activities involving electronic sales suppression tools (ESSTs) for people and businesses that have Australian tax obligations. You may be liable for criminal and administrative penalties if you:

    • produce, supply, possess or use an ESST
    • knowingly assist others to produce, supply, possess or use an ESST
    • promote the use of an ESST.

    On this page:

    See also:

    How to tell if something may be an ESST

    Characteristics of an ESST

    ESSTs can come in different forms and are constantly evolving. For example, an ESST can be:

    • an external device connected to a point of sale (POS) system
    • additional software installed into otherwise-compliant software
    • a feature or modification, like a script or code, that is a part of a POS system or software.

    An ESST may allow income to be misrepresented and under-reported by:

    • deleting transactions from electronic record-keeping systems
    • changing transactions to reduce the amount of a sale
    • misrepresenting a sales record, for example by allowing GST taxable sales to be re-categorised as GST non-taxable sales
    • falsifying POS records.

    Working out if a tool is considered an ESST

    A reasonable person must consider that one of the principal functions of an ESST is to misrepresent transactions recorded on a POS system.

    If you are unsure, see Examples.

    What isn’t an ESST

    A tool with the ability to change a record isn’t an ESST if the principal function ensures records accurately reflect transactions. For example, standard POS systems often include a feature that allows transactions to be edited or modified to correct genuine mistakes.

    If you are unsure, see Examples.

    Checking if there's an ESST on your POS system

    Most point of sale (POS) systems won’t include an ESST.

    If you’re concerned that your POS system may contain an ESST, contact your POS system provider and ask them if your POS version, or make and model, contains such a tool. If they advise:

    • it doesn’t, you have nothing to worry about. If they tell you your POS system doesn’t have an ESST, but your POS system has electronic sales suppression functions, contact us and we can assist you
    • it does, you need to ask them to remove the ESST and then follow the steps below.

    What you need to do if you have an ESST

    The six-month transitional period (from 4 October 2018 to 3 April 2019) has finished.

    If your POS system provider tells you that your POS version, or make and model, has an ESST:

    1. Ask them to remove the ESST from your POS system.
    2. After you have removed the tool, make a voluntary disclosure and let us know by sending an email to esst@ato.gov.au or sending a letter to

    Australian Taxation Office
    GPO Box 9990
    [insert the name and postcode of your capital city]

    1. Review the information you have reported on past tax returns and activity statements to make sure what you reported was accurate.
    2. Amend or correct your returns and activity statements if required.

    You can also make a voluntary disclosure through other channels, such as your registered tax professional, as long as it is made in the approved form.

    See also:

    If you don't remove your ESST

    ESSTs have been banned because they aid tax evasion. Not removing your ESST may involve audit amendments and significant penalties. If you possess, use, produce or supply an ESST (including knowingly assisting others or promoting the use of an ESST), you will be subject to strong action as part of our response to the black economy.

    Examples

    The following are examples of tools that are ESSTs and tools that are not ESSTs.

    Example: Downloading software with sales suppression capabilities

    Ron downloads ‘Sales Zapper’, a software program that is compatible with his existing POS system. It’s designed specifically to manipulate sales records and can also erase certain records without leaving a trace.

    A reasonable person would consider that one of the program’s principal functions is to falsify, manipulate, hide, misrepresent, destroy or prevent the creation of records, so Sales Zapper falls under the definition of an ESST.

    End of example

     

    Example: A USB device with more than one principal function

    Anthea operates a café and realises that storing data from her POS system is using too much space on her computer’s hard drive, so she buys a USB device to store the information on instead. The USB device is sold as ‘SalesUSB’ and when the POS system data is transferred to the USB, there is a hidden program that deletes every fifth cash sale. SalesUSB has two principal functions; one for storage and one to delete every fifth sale.

    The hidden program is part of SalesUSB and is an ESST as a reasonable person would consider that one of its principal functions is to falsify, manipulate, hide, misrepresent, destroy or prevent the creation of the user’s records.

    End of example

     

    Example: Non-compliant training mode

    Stephen operates a pub and buys a separate module called ‘TrainStaff’ from his POS developer, which he adds to his POS system. The module contains an additional function to enter, amend or delete genuine business transactions (not just those entered while the system was run in training mode) without leaving a trace.

    A reasonable person would consider the additional function to manipulate and delete live sales is an ESST as one of its principal functions is to falsify, hide, misrepresent, destroy or prevent the creation of transaction records.

    End of example

     

    Example: Compliant training mode

    Nick owns a book store and runs his POS system in training mode to teach new employees how to use various functions such as correcting errors and issuing refunds.

    While in training mode, all transactions are separated from live transactions and there’s a printer control that adds a watermark on receipts to indicate they were generated while in training mode.

    End of example

     

    Example: Altering sales records in a compliant way

    Kieran owns an ice-cream shop and his POS system has a function to void transactions. This function can be used to legitimately correct errors by reversing the transaction and input a new transaction that accurately reflects the actual transaction. This function can also be used to issue refunds.

    When the void transaction function is used, a record is still kept in the history log of the POS system. The void transaction function produces a receipt and marks it as a void transaction. All receipts have sequential transaction numbers so any void transactions with missing receipts can be identified.

    End of example

    Offences relating to ESSTs

    It is an offence to:

    • produce or supply an ESST
    • possess an ESST
    • incorrectly keep records using an ESST.

    Criminal or administrative penalties may apply.

    Regardless of whether you intended to do the wrong thing, you have committed an offence if it can be proven that it happened. However, in some circumstances you may be able to avoid a penalty.

    In addition to the offences above, if a business that you manage has committed any of the ESST offences, you may also be liable for those offences.

    Producing or supplying an ESST

    For a person or business within Australia, it’s an offence to:

    • manufacture, develop or publish an ESST
    • supply or make available for use, an ESST
    • provide a service that involves the use of an ESST.

    For a person or business outside Australia, it's an offence to:

    • manufacture, develop or publish an ESST, if the ESST is used to modify records a business needs to keep under Australian tax law
    • supply or provide a service that involves the use of an ESST to a business that needs to keep records under Australian tax law.

    Criminal penalties apply if you’re convicted. A Court may impose a criminal penalty up to a maximum of 5,000 penalty units.

    If you are not prosecuted for the criminal offence, we may impose an administrative penalty of 60 penalty units.

    If you assist others in taking action that results in an administrative or criminal penalty for production or supply of an ESST, the above penalties may also apply.

    Example: Developer and supplier based overseas

    Sandra is a software developer based in Spain. She develops an ESST that enables businesses to alter their sales records to decrease figures without detection. She advertises the tool for sale online.

    Geoff owns a café in Brisbane. He purchases the ESST from Sandra’s website, installs it on his POS system and uses it to modify his business’ sales records.

    Even though Sandra is not in Australia, she has committed an offence by developing and supplying an ESST to modify records that Geoff is required to keep under Australian tax law. Geoff has also committed the offences of possessing and incorrectly keeping records using an ESST.

    End of example

    Find out about:

    Possessing an ESST

    You have committed an offence if you acquire, possess, control, or have a right to use an ESST.

    Criminal penalties for possessing an ESST apply if you’re convicted. A Court may impose a criminal penalty up to a maximum penalty of 500 penalty units.

    If you are not prosecuted for the offence, we may impose an administrative penalty of 30 penalty units.

    If you assist others in taking action that results in an administrative or criminal penalty for possessing an ESST, the above penalties may also apply.

    Example: Possessing an ESST

    Kim owns a cafe and directs her employee to purchase and use an ESST to remove every second cash sale from her sales records.

    Even though Kim doesn’t have physical possession of the tool, she has committed the offences of:

    • possessing an ESST as she has ‘control’ of it by instructing her employee to use it on her behalf
    • using an ESST to incorrectly keep records.

    Her employee has also committed the offences of possessing and using an ESST.

    End of example

    Incorrectly keeping records using an ESST

    It’s an offence to keep, make, alter, or prevent the creation of a tax record using an ESST.

    The tool doesn’t actually have to be used by the person or business that owns the records.

    Criminal penalties for incorrectly keeping records with an ESST apply if you’re convicted. A Court may impose a criminal penalty up to a maximum penalty of 1,000 penalty units.

    If you are not prosecuted for the offence, we may impose an administrative penalty of 60 penalty units.

    If you assist others in taking action that results in an administrative or criminal penalty for using an ESST to incorrectly keep records, the above penalties may also apply.

    Example: Using an ESST through a third party

    Nicole develops a POS system with a hidden backdoor that can be activated to give her remote access. Nicole sells her POS system to Lina for her shop and offers to provide an additional service where she uses the backdoor and modifies Lina’s sales transactions using an ESST. Lina agrees and pays Nicole a service fee.

    At the end of each month, Nicole uses the backdoor to remotely access Lina’s POS system and run a script to automatically reduce high-value transactions by substituting them for cheaper items.

    By acquiring Nicole’s services, Lina has altered her records with an ESST even though Nicole was the one actually using the tool. Lina has committed an offence of incorrectly keeping records using an ESST.

    Nicole has committed the offences of using, possessing, producing and supplying an ESST.

    Lina has also committed the offences of possessing and using an ESST.

    End of example

    See also:

    Assisting others to commit ESST offences

    Administrative and criminal penalties also apply if you knowingly assist a person or business to take action that would result in an ESST penalty or promote the use of an ESST.

    Example: Assisting with committing ESST offences

    Kevin owns a sporting goods shop and learns about ESST from the media. Kevin is interested in getting an ESST and asks his tax agent, Frank, about it.

    Frank purchases and arranges for an ESST to be delivered directly to Kevin, who installs and uses it.

    Kevin has committed the criminal offences for possessing an ESST and using it to incorrectly keep records.

    Frank has also committed the criminal offence of supplying an ESST. Because Frank has assisted Kevin to acquire an ESST, he has also committed the same criminal offences for possessing and using an ESST to incorrectly keep records.

    Administrative penalties may also apply for Kevin and Frank.

    End of example

    When you may not be liable for a penalty

    Criminal penalties

    You may not have committed an offence for:

    • producing, supplying or possessing an ESST if you can show that it was for the purpose of preventing or deterring tax evasion or enforcing a tax law
    • producing, supplying, possessing or using an ESST if you can show that you made an honest mistake and have sufficient evidence to support your claims.

    Administrative penalties

    You may not be liable to an administrative penalty for producing, supplying or possessing an ESST if you can show us that it was for the purpose of preventing or deterring tax evasion or enforcing a tax law.

    See also:

    Report a concern

    If you suspect an individual or business is producing, supplying, in possession of or using an ESST (or assisting a business to do so), you can report it to us confidentially online.

    Try to provide as much detail as you can as this will assist us to fully assess the information, for example:

    • name and address of the business
    • their ABN or a link to their website (if possible)
    • date you made a purchase and the price (if applicable)
    • copy of the receipt (if you have one)
    • details that make you think that the individual or business is producing, supplying or using an ESST.
    Report a concern
      Last modified: 08 Apr 2019QC 56938