ato logo
Search Suggestion:

Methodology

What method we use to estimate the Alcohol tax gap.

Published 31 October 2024

About the approach

We use a 5-step bottom-up channel analysis approach to estimate the Alcohol tax gap. We consider the different channels where non-compliance can occur and make an estimate for each of these.

Step 1: Calculate gap associated with large manufacturers

A small group of large-scale manufacturers pay over 90% of the total alcohol collected each year. Given their contribution, we work closely with these taxpayers to maximise voluntary compliance. We draw on our understanding of their business arrangements to inform the overall estimate.

Step 2: Estimate gap for small manufacturers

We estimate the gap for small-scale manufacturers, sometimes referred to as micro-breweries and micro-distilleries, using risk analysis and operational intelligence. We apply the identified rates of non-compliance to our gap estimate each year.

Step 3: Estimate gap for large scale illicit activity

We estimate the amount of large-scale illicit alcohol activity from operational data and internal expert judgment. Using operational data, we identify the minimum amount of tax lost through large-scale illicit alcohol activity. We then use internal expert judgment to uplift this amount to account for large-scale illicit alcohol activity we assess is occurring but not detected. This is due to these entities operating in the Shadow Economy and therefore outside the system.

Outstanding statutory demands for unpaid duty related to the large-scale illicit activity sector have been incorporated into this year's revisions, increasing gross gaps and decreasing net gaps for the 2016–17 to 2019–20 period.

Step 4: Estimate gap for small scale illicit activity

We estimate the duty evaded from 2 key sources of non-compliance in relation to small scale illicit alcohol activity:

  • illicit home distillation
  • undeclared imports from international passenger arrivals.

For illicit home distilling, we use sales data on stills to estimate how much alcohol is produced. We apply assumptions around the volume produced by these stills over time.

For undeclared imports of alcohol (that are excess to international passenger concessions), we estimate a percentage of arrivals that did not declare their excess alcohol and the amount they carried. This allows us to calculate a volume imported and the customs duty evaded. Notably the fall in passenger numbers due to COVID-19 restrictions resulted in a reduced figure in the 2019–20 and 2020–21 years.

Step 5: Consolidate the estimate

The gross gap is the total of steps 1 to 4. It does not consider any amendments or detections. We estimate the:

  • theoretical liability by adding together tax reported and unreported tax
  • gross gap by subtracting tax voluntarily reported and paid from the theoretical tax
  • net gap by subtracting amendments from the gross gap.

Summary of the estimation process

Table 2 provides a summary of each step of the estimation process and the results for each year.

Table 2: Summary of estimation process

Step

Description

2017–18

2018–19

2019–20

2020–21

2021–22

2022–23

1

Gap estimated from Large producers

30

24

14

34

37

41

2

Gap estimated from Small producers

35

37

38

45

48

49

3

Gap estimated from Large illicit

300

322

424

592

628

638

4

Gap estimated from Small illicit

77

80

66

23

32

71

5.1

Gross gap ($m)

689

720

662

695

747

800

5.2

Gross gap (%)

11.4

11.3

10.0

9.0

9.1

9.6

5.3

Legal clearances

5,534

5,798

6,007

7,004

7,435

7,550

5.4

Total theoretical tax

6,070

6,356

6,604

7,697

8,180

8,348

5.5

Seizures and compliance activities

153

162

64

2

2

2

5.6

Non-pursuable debt

95

95

55

0

0

0

5.7

Net gap ($m)

536

558

597

693

745

798

5.8

Net gap (%)

8.8

8.8

9.0

9.0

9.1

9.6

Find out more about our overall methodology, data sources and analysis used for Principles and approaches to measuring gaps.

Limitations

Due to limitations with data, we rely on these assumptions:

  • Given the nature of illicit alcohol activity, it is difficult to estimate the amount that it contributes to the gap. To overcome this, for
    • large scale-illicit alcohol activity – we rely on operational data and apply an uplift which is informed by expert judgment
    • small-scale illicit alcohol activity – we apply several assumptions based on research and other data.
  • Customs duty paid on alcohol is collected by the Department of Home Affairs. While we can use customs data for parts of our estimate, there are still components of the estimate which relate to non-compliance with paying customs duty which we have limited data for. These limitations mean that we rely on assumptions when forming our estimate.

Accounting for the shadow economy

The large and small illicit alcohol activity components of the gap are attributed to the shadow economy. This captures activity where the participants are deliberately avoiding their obligations to pay duty.

Table 3: Impacts of the shadow economy on the Alcohol tax gap, 2017–18 to 2022–23

Element

2017–18

2018–19

2019–20

2020–21

2021–22

2022–23

Small illicit activity

77

80

66

23

32

71

Large illicit activity

300

322

424

592

628

638

Amendments for illicit activity

44

46

0

0

0

0

Total impact of shadow economy

420

448

490

615

660

709

Updates and revisions to previous estimates

Each year we refresh our estimates in line with the annual report. Changes from previously published estimates occur for a variety of reasons, including:

  • improvements in methodology
  • revisions to data
  • additional information becoming available.

Figure 2a: Current and previous net tax gap estimate ranges, 2017–18 to 2022–23

Previously published estimates. This figure presents the estimates from the 2020 to 2024 program estimates on the same graph.

Figure 2b: Current and previous net tax gap estimates, 2017–18 to 2022–23

The range of previously published estimates ranges. Data is shown in table 4.

The data for both figures is presented in Table 4.

Table 4: Current and previous net Alcohol gap estimates, 2017–18 to 2022–23

Program year

2017–18

2018–19

2019–20

2020–21

2021–22

2022–23

2024 program (%)

8.8

8.8

9.0

9.0

9.1

9.6

2023 program (%)

8.8

8.8

9.0

9.0

9.1

n/a

2022 program (%)

9.3

9.3

9.4

9.0

n/a

n/a

2022 program (%)

9.1

9.0

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

2021 program (%)

9.6

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Note: The changes to our estimates over the 2017–18 period reflect updated information attributed to the demand notices highlighted in the 2022 and 2023 period estimates.

QC103298