Misaligned fiscal years
Fiscal year
For global and domestic minimum tax purposes, the term 'fiscal year' generally refers to the accounting period for which the ultimate parent entity (UPE) of a multinational enterprise group (MNE group) prepares its consolidated financial statements.
If the UPE does not prepare consolidated financial statements, the fiscal year of the UPE will be the calendar year instead.
As such, a constituent entity's own accounting period does not determine its fiscal year for Pillar Two purposes, only the UPEs. Lodgment due dates for Australian group entities are also determined using the fiscal year of the UPE.
Example: fiscal year of subsidiary constituent entity
- Foreign UPE: Year-end 31 December 2025 (prepares consolidated financial statements for January–December).
- Australian constituent entity: Local statutory year-end 30 June.
The Australian constituent entity's GIR, foreign lodgment notification, AIUTR and DMTR lodgment obligations are for the fiscal year 1 January to 31 December 2025. The fiscal year is solely determined by reference to the UPE's fiscal year. These lodgments are due by 30 June 2026.
For Pillar Two purposes, if the accounting period of a constituent entity is different to the fiscal year of its UPE, it may impact the manner in which its information is included in GloBE computations. This is explained further in the section below.
End of exampleFiscal year misalignment and performing calculations
Some MNE groups may have constituent entities that maintain financial accounts based on a different accounting period to that of the UPE.
There are 2 different accounting conventions MNE groups use to reconcile such differences, depending on the accounting standard adopted in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements:
- Inclusion of full fiscal year results – some MNE groups will include the constituent entity's financial accounting results for the accounting period that ends within the UPE’s fiscal year. This may result in some income or expenses being attributed to a period before the UPE’s fiscal year begins
- for example, the UPE’s consolidated financial statement for the fiscal year ended 31 December 2025 may include an Australian constituent entity’s accounting results for the full accounting period ended 30 June 2025.
- Segregation and combination of results – other MNE groups will split the constituent entity's results to match the UPE’s fiscal year, combining the parts of the constituent entity’s 2 accounting periods that align with the UPE’s reporting period
- under this method, using a similar example, the UPE’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended 31 December 2025 may include the Australian constituent entity's accounting results from 2 different accounting periods
- 1 January to 30 June 2025
- 1 July to 31 December 2025.
- under this method, using a similar example, the UPE’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended 31 December 2025 may include the Australian constituent entity's accounting results from 2 different accounting periods
The top-up tax calculations for a constituent entity with a different accounting period to its UPE will be based on whichever method has been employed to include the constituent entity’s results in the UPE's consolidated financial statements. The revenue of the constituent entity will also be included on this basis in determining whether the MNE group has met the revenue threshold for the purposes of the global and domestic minimum tax.
There may be instances where a constituent entity with a different accounting period to its UPE is not included in the UPE's consolidated financial statements, such as on materiality grounds. In such cases, top-up tax calculations must be based on the financial accounting period that ends during the UPE’s fiscal year to ensure the necessary data to perform the top-up tax calculations is available when the GloBE Information Return (GIR) for that fiscal year is due.
In line with ordinary record keeping requirements, taxpayers are required to keep records supporting the accounting method used.
Example: ETR calculation – inclusion of full fiscal year results
Crane Inc (Crane) was incorporated in Jurisdiction A and is the UPE of the Crane MNE group. The group first became in-scope of the global and domestic minimum tax for the fiscal year ended 31 March 2025.
Emu Pty Ltd (Emu) is the only Australian constituent entity of the Crane MNE group. It maintains its financial accounts based on a calendar year accounting period ending on 31 December. Emu's accounting results for the full accounting period ended 31 December 2024 disclosed net income of $50 million and income tax expense of $10 million.
Where the accounting period of a constituent entity does not align with Crane's fiscal year, in preparing Crane's consolidated financial statements the group has adopted the method of including the constituent entity's accounting results for its full accounting period. Consequently, Crane's consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended 31 March 2025 includes Emu's accounting results for the full accounting period 1 January 2024 to 31 December 2024.
For Pillar Two purposes, for the fiscal year ended 31 March 2025, Emu's:
- financial accounting net income or loss (FANIL) is $50 million
- GloBE income is also $50 million, assuming no GloBE adjustments are required
- adjusted covered taxes is $10 million, assuming no adjustments to covered taxes are required.
The jurisdictional effective tax rate (ETR) for Australia is 20% (being $10 million divided by $50 million) for the fiscal year ended 31 March 2025.
End of example
Example: ETR calculation – segregation and combination of results
Swan Limited (Swan) is incorporated in Australia and is the UPE of the Swan MNE group. The group first became in-scope of the global and domestic minimum tax for the fiscal year ended 30 June 2025.
Goose Holdings (Goose) is the only constituent entity of the Swan MNE group located in Jurisdiction B. It has an accounting period ending 31 March. Where the accounting period of a constituent entity does not align with Swan's fiscal year, in preparing Swan's consolidated financial statements the group adopts the method of segregating and combining the constituent entity's accounting results. Goose's accounting results for the periods ended 31 March 2025 and 31 March 2026, segregated in that way, are summarised in the table below.
|
Period |
Net income ($m) |
Income tax expense ($m) |
|---|---|---|
|
1 April 2024 – 30 June 2024 |
12 |
4 |
|
1 July 2024 – 31 March 2025 |
36 |
9 |
|
1 April 2025 – 30 June 2025 |
20 |
4 |
|
1 July 2025 – 31 March 2026 |
40 |
6 |
Consequently, Swan's consolidated financial statement for the fiscal year ended 30 June 2025 combines Goose's accounting results as shown in the table below.
|
Period |
Net income ($m) |
Income tax expense ($m) |
|---|---|---|
|
1 July 2024 – 31 March 2025 |
36 |
9 |
|
1 April 2025 – 30 June 2025 |
20 |
4 |
|
Total |
56 |
13 |
For Pillar Two purposes, for the fiscal year ended 30 June 2025, Goose's:
- FANIL is $56 million
- GloBE income is also $56 million, assuming no adjustments are required
- adjusted covered tax is $13 million, assuming no adjustments to covered taxes are required.
The jurisdictional ETR for Jurisdiction B is 23% ($13 million ÷ $56 million) for that fiscal year.
End of examplePrior period adjustments
Certain adjustments are required to a constituent entity's top-up tax calculations when there are changes to its covered tax liability in a previous fiscal year. Adjustments depend on whether the total adjustments to covered tax liabilities for that prior year for all constituent entities located in the same jurisdiction are:
- an increase or decrease
- a material or immaterial decrease
- a decrease that relates to a pre or post-GloBE fiscal year.
Increase or immaterial decrease to prior year covered taxes
When there is an increase in total adjustments to prior fiscal year covered tax liabilities of all constituent entities located in the same jurisdiction as the relevant constituent entity, that increase is treated as an adjustment to the relevant constituent entity’s adjusted covered taxes in the current year.
When the total adjustments is an immaterial decrease, the filing constituent entity may make an annual election to treat those adjustments as an adjustment to the relevant constituent entity's adjusted covered taxes in the current year. If an election is not made, then the treatment for decreases, other than an immaterial decrease, applies.
A decrease in covered tax liabilities for a prior fiscal year is considered immaterial where the sum of the adjustments to those liabilities is less than 1 million Euro.
Decrease to prior year covered taxes
The treatment of adjustments which lead to a decrease, other than an immaterial decrease, in covered tax liabilities for a prior fiscal year depends on whether the prior fiscal year in question is a pre or post-GloBE fiscal year.
Prior fiscal year is a GloBE fiscal year
Where the sum of the adjustments to the liability for covered taxes for the prior year is a decrease, other than an immaterial decrease covered by an election, the relevant constituent entities are required to:
- reduce their adjusted covered taxes for the prior year by the amount of the decrease
- adjust their GloBE income or loss for all relevant fiscal years as necessary.
The effective tax rate and jurisdictional top-up tax for the prior year is recalculated. Any resulting increase in jurisdictional top-up tax for the prior year is treated as an addition to top-up tax in the current year rather than in the prior fiscal year.
Where, for accounting purposes, the decrease in covered tax liability has been treated as a decrease to the income tax expense of the current fiscal year, there should also be a corresponding increasing adjustment for the purposes of calculating the current year’s adjusted covered tax.
The MNE group is not required to amend its GIR, or any tax returns filed in association with the GloBE Rules for the prior year in which the adjustment relates. However, the adjustment will be reflected in the current year GIR and tax return.
Example: top-up tax following prior year adjustment
Seabird Co is an Australian constituent entity of an MNE group. They first become in-scope of the global and domestic minimum tax for the fiscal year ended 30 June 2025.
In the 2026 fiscal year, Seabird Co receive a $9 million refund of income tax from an amended assessment. This is due to the initial inclusion of $30 million of income for the 2025 fiscal year which is later considered to be non-assessable. There are no adjustments to any other constituent entity's income tax liability for the 2025 fiscal year.
For Australian global and domestic minimum tax purposes, the $9 million refund represents a material decrease in covered taxes relating to a prior fiscal year. Seabird Co recalculates its adjusted covered taxes and GloBE income and loss for the 2025 fiscal year. This results in the effective tax rate for the MNE group in Australia falling below the minimum rate of 15%.
As a result, the company is liable for additional current top-up tax of $450,000. Seabird Co adds the additional current top-up tax of $450,000 in its jurisdictional top-up tax calculation for the 2026 fiscal year and records it in the GIR, and Australian DMT tax returns, for the 2026 fiscal year.
If the $9 million refund is in respect of income for the 2024 fiscal year, recalculations would not be required because Seabird Co was not in scope of the global and domestic minimum tax in the 2024 fiscal year.
End of examplePrior fiscal year is a pre-GloBE fiscal year
Where a decrease in covered taxes relates to a fiscal year prior to the application of the global and domestic minimum tax, no adjustments in the prior year are required. This means that there should not be any additional current top-up tax arising from recalculations of effective tax rates of pre-GloBE fiscal years.
However, relevant adjustments must still be made to the current year adjusted covered taxes. For instance, where the sum of the adjustments to the liability for covered taxes for the prior year is a decrease, other than an immaterial decrease covered by an election, the relevant constituent entities are not required to recalculate the prior year adjusted covered taxes. They should still include a corresponding increasing adjustment in calculating the current year's adjusted covered taxes where there has been a decrease to the income tax expense of the current fiscal year.
Deferred taxes and pre-GloBE fiscal years
Where the prior year adjustment relates to deferred tax expense, resulting in a decrease in income tax expense relating to a pre-GloBE fiscal year, an increasing adjustment should be included in calculating the current fiscal year's adjusted covered taxes. However, this prior period adjustment and its impact on the reversal of a deferred tax liability or deferred tax asset should be taken into account when determining the amount of the deferred tax liability or asset to be recognised in the transition year and any subsequent fiscal year.
Snapshot of ATO administrative approaches
This is a condensed overview of the ATO’s practical administrative approaches for Pillar Two, which are set out across various ATO web pages and, where applicable, in the relevant practical compliance guideline.
This summary should not be relied on in isolation. You should instead refer to the original ATO materials for full details.
|
Item |
Description |
Original location of guidance |
|---|---|---|
|
Administering potential legislative amendments |
Given Pillar Two is a new regime that the OECD continues to develop through new agreed administrative guidance, where an inconsistency arises due to an item of administrative guidance not yet incorporated into domestic law, or due to a minor drafting oversight, the ATO will not direct compliance resources to test the compliance of taxpayers' self-assessment with the existing law for taxpayer positions that anticipate OECD‑aligned, retrospective legislative amendments, in filings. |
|
|
Reporting of joint operations in the GIR |
Joint operations that meet certain requirements may not need to be separately listed in the GIR. Refer to our lodge and pay content for further details. |
|
|
Intra-group arrangements within tax consolidated groups |
The ATO will not apply compliance resources to test the application of the hybrid arbitrage rule to certain intra-group financing arrangements in certain circumstances where entering into the arrangement does not lead to a beneficial impact for the MNE group in meeting the transitional CBC reporting safe harbour. |
|
|
Allocation of top-up tax within tax consolidated groups |
Generally, the ATO will not apply compliance resources to how DMT or UTPR top‑up tax is allocated, where one or more entities to which top-up tax is allocated are subsidiary members of an Australian tax consolidated group, provided the total Australian top‑up tax outcome is correct. |
|
|
Penalties |
The ATO's approach to the enforcement of penalties during a transition period aims to balance the need to support taxpayers to understand and comply with their global and domestic minimum tax obligations with the need to administer the legislation in a manner which is consistent with the OECD's GloBE Rules. |
PCG 2025/4 Global and domestic minimum tax lodgment obligations – transitional approach |