This information may not apply to the current year. Check the content carefully to ensure it is applicable to your circumstances.
End of attention
If a depreciating asset is fixed to leased land and the lessee has a right to remove it, the lessee is the holder while the right to remove the asset exists.
Example: Holder of depreciating asset fixed to leased land
Jo leases land from Bill who owns the land. Jo purchases some machinery and fixes it to the land. Under property law the machinery is treated as part of the land so Bill is its legal owner.
However, under the terms of her lease, Jo can remove the machinery from the land at any time. Because she has acquired and fixed the machinery to the land and has a right to remove it, Jo holds the machinery while the right to remove it exists.
If a lessee or owner of certain other rights over land (for example, an easement) improves the land with a depreciating asset, that person is the holder of the asset if the asset is for their own use even though they have no right to remove it from the land. They remain the holder while the lease or right exists.
Example: Holder of depreciating asset which improves leased land
Jo leases land from Bill to use for farming. Jo installs an irrigation system on the land which is an improvement to the land. While Bill is the legal owner under property law as the irrigation system is part of his land, Jo holds the irrigation system. Even though she has no right to remove the irrigation system under her contract with Bill, Jo may deduct amounts for its decline in value for the term of the lease because:
Last modified: 18 Jul 2006QC 27742
- she improved the land, and
- the improvement is for her use.