House of Representatives

Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2016

Revised Explanatory Memorandum

(Circulated by authority of the Attorney-General, Senator the Honourable George Brandis QC)
This memorandum takes account of amendments made by the Senate to the bill as introduced and supersedes the explanatory memorandum tabled in the senate

[1]
(1978) 141 CLR 54.

[2]
Section 138 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth).

[3]
See s 45 of the SD Act.

[4]
Brandstetter v Austria , Application No: 11170/84; 12876/87; 13468/87, Strasbourg judgment 28 August 1991 §§41-69.

[5]
H. v Belgium , Application No: 8950/80, Strasbourg judgment 30 November 1987 §§49-55.

[6]
(1978) 141 CLR 54.

[7]
Section 138 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth).

[8]
See s 63 of the TIA Act.

[9]
Brandstetter v Austria , Application No: 11170/84; 12876/87; 13468/87, Strasbourg judgment 28 August 1991 §§41-69.

[10]
H. v Belgium , Application No: 8950/80, Strasbourg judgment 30 November 1987 §§49-55.

[11]
(1978) 141 CLR 54.

[12]
Section 138 of the Evidence Act 1995 ( Cth ).

[13]
See section 63 of the TIA Act.

[14]
(1978) 141 CLR 54.

[15]
Section 138 of the Evidence Act 1995 ( Cth ).

[16]
See section 45 of the SD Act.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).