ATO logo

Rental expenses

Rental expenses you can and can't claim as a deduction and whether you can claim immediately or over several years.

Published 30 May 2026

Types of rental expenses

You can claim a deduction for certain expenses that relate to a rental property you own if the expenses are incurred in gaining or producing your assessable rental income. You can't claim expenses of a capital or private nature; however you may be able to either:

  • claim a deduction for the decline in value of certain capital (depreciating) assets
  • claim a deduction for the cost of constructing capital works on a building or structural improvement
  • include certain capital costs in the cost base of the property for CGT purposes.

There are 3 categories of rental expenses, those for which you:

Always check your supplier's ABN

If you pay a contractor for services on your rental property, you need to check that they have an Australian business number (ABN). If they don't provide you with an ABN, you may need to withhold 47% of that payment and pay it to us. For details of when to withhold, see Withholding from suppliers. You'll need to register for a withholding account, if you don't have one.

If you don't withhold from payments to a contractor where they don't provide you with an ABN, you may not be able to claim a deduction for those expenses.

For more information, see Removing tax deductibility of non-compliant payments.

Example 5: withholding from suppliers

Sergio and Marcia own a rental property and need to make repairs to a wall.

Sergio gets a quote from Derek’s Wall Repairs, a sole trader. Derek offers to do the job for $2,500 with a tax invoice, or $1,800 for cash. Sergio and Marcia choose to pay cash and not receive a tax invoice. They don't ask for Derek's ABN and don't withhold any amount from the $1,800. This is a non-compliant payment as it doesn't comply with PAYG withholding and reporting obligations.

As Derek doesn't provide an ABN, Sergio and Marcia should withhold 47% of the $1,800 payment. They should withhold the amount of $846 and pay it to us and only pay Derek $954, the balance of the $1,800 price for the wall repairs.

As no amount was withheld and paid to the ATO, Sergio and Marcia can't claim a deduction for the repair.

End of example

Expenses for which you can't claim deductions

You can't claim deductions for expenses:

Travel expenses

Travel expenses include the costs of:

  • travel to inspect, maintain or collect rent for the property
  • meals and accommodation that relate to that travel.

You can't claim a deduction for travel expenses that relate to your residential rental property, unless you're either:

  • using the property in carrying on a business (including a business of letting rental properties)
  • an excluded entity.

If your travel expenses also relate to another income producing activity, you'll need to apportion the expenses. For more information, see Apportionment of travel expenses.

Certain second-hand depreciating assets

You can't claim a deduction for a decline in value of certain second-hand depreciating assets against your residential rental property income unless you're either:

  • using the property in carrying on a business (including a business of letting rental properties)
  • an excluded entity.

For more information, see Limit on deductions for decline in value of second-hand depreciating assets.

For more information, see:

Acquisition and disposal costs

You can't claim a deduction for the costs of acquiring or disposing of your rental property, such as:

  • purchase price of the property
  • fees on bank guarantees in lieu of deposits
  • conveyancing costs
  • advertising expenses
  • fees of a buyer’s agent you engage to find you a suitable rental property to purchase, including where the agent recommends a property manager free of charge as an optional or supplementary service
  • stamp duty on the transfer of the property (but not stamp duty on a lease of property, see Lease document expenses).

However, these costs may form part of the cost base of the property for CGT purposes.

Example 6: acquisition costs

Yusef and Marie bought a rental property as joint tenants for $170,000 in July 2025. They also paid surveyor’s fees of $350 and stamp duty of $750 on the transfer of the property. Neither of these expenses are deductible against the Yusef and Marie's rental income. However, in addition to the $170,000 purchase price, they can include the incidental costs of $350 and $750 (totalling $1,100) in the cost base or reduced cost base of the property.

When Yusef and Marie dispose of the property, their cost base or reduced cost base to work out the amount of any capital gain or capital loss will be $171,100 ($170,000 + $1,100).

End of example

For more information, see Guide to capital gains tax 2026.

Ownership and use expenses for your holiday home

What is a holiday home?

A holiday home is a property that is used (or held for use) for either:

  • your holidays or recreation
  • the holidays or recreation of your family members and friends either for no rent or at a reduced rate.

For these purposes, 'holiday' means a period of cessation from work, or of recreation, a vacation. 'Recreation' includes amusement, sport or similar leisure-time activities.

 

Example 7: Rental property not a holiday home

Cho owns an apartment in Geraldton, Western Australia that she markets to holidaymakers through a sharing economy platform. Cho also lives in Geraldton so she provides services for her guests which include tours of the local area.

As Cho has her own home in Geraldton, she never uses or reserves the apartment for her own private use. She also doesn't allow her family or friends to use the property for free or for reduced rates of rent.

Cho takes all reasonable steps to ensure the property is rented for as many days as possible during the income year, including:

  • not placing unreasonable restrictions on the property
  • keeping the rent comparable to similar properties in the area
  • promptly replying to requests to rent the property.

The apartment Cho owns in Geraldton is not a holiday home. She doesn't use it or reserve it for her own private use. Cho also doesn't allow family and friends to use the property for free or for reduced rents and she takes all reasonable steps to ensure the property is rented out.

Cho can claim a deduction for the expenses she incurs to produce rental income from the apartment.

End of example

Ownership and use expenses

You can claim a deduction for ownership and use expenses for your holiday home only if it's used or held for use mainly to produce rental income.

If your holiday home isn't mainly used (or held for use) to produce rental income, you can't claim any deductions for ownership or use expenses.

Ownership and use expenses (for a holiday home) are costs you incur:

  • to acquire ownership or the rights to use it
  • to retain ownership or rights to use it
  • to use, operate, maintain, or repair it
  • in relation to any obligation associated with your ownership or your rights to use it.

Common examples of ownership and use expenses for a holiday home include:

  • interest on money borrowed to finance the purchase of the property
  • borrowing expenses
  • council rates
  • water rates
  • body corporate fees
  • land tax
  • repairs and maintenance.

Ownership and use expenses don't include the booking fees, advertising fees and cleaning fees you incur when your holiday home is rented out.

Expenses that are not ownership or use expenses are deductible to the extent they are incurred in gaining or producing your assessable income.

Used or held for use mainly to produce rental income

Using or holding your holiday home for use mainly to produce rental income means that it is chiefly, principally or for the most part used for that purpose.

A simple analysis of the times during an income year that your holiday home is used (or held for use) for rental purposes, compared to other uses is not enough to establish that it is used (or held for use) mainly to produce assessable income.

What you intend to mainly use your holiday home for does not determine its main use.

Just advertising your holiday home for rent at times when it is not used by you does not mean that it is used (or held for use) mainly to produce assessable income.

Whether you use your holiday home (or hold it for use) mainly to produce assessable income will be determined objectively based on a number of factors including the:

  • time your holiday home is dedicated to income-producing use
  • pattern of how you use or hold your holiday home for your holidays and recreation (or the holidays or recreation of your family members and friends for no rent or at a reduced rate)
  • use or availability of your holiday home during times when it is desirable as a holiday destination, such as during school holidays, public holidays, or peak seasonal demand periods

No single factor on its own will determine if your holiday home is used, or held for use, mainly to produce assessable income. All circumstances, including the degree, extent and prioritisation of the uses will be considered. The question is one of fact and degree.

Peak seasonal demand for your holiday home will vary according to its location and when it is desirable as a destination for holidays or recreation. For example, a property in a coastal or resort area may experience peak demand during the summer season, while a property near a ski field may have peak demand in winter. For a holiday home located in the central business district of a capital city, peak demand may instead be influenced by major events such as sporting fixtures or festivals.

You should consider the location-specific seasonal demand characteristics of your holiday home, including when peak demand would ordinarily be expected.

You should be able to objectively explain why the use of your holiday home (including holding it for use) for your holidays or recreation (or for your family members or friends for no rent or at a reduced rate), does not detract from it being used (or held) mainly to derive assessable rental income.

You may be able to add any ownership and use expenses that you can't deduct to the cost base or reduced cost base of the holiday home to work out the CGT consequences when it is sold.

 

Example 8: mainly used (or held for use) for rental

Viraji lives in Sydney and owns an apartment on the Gold Coast in Queensland. The property is near the beach and is managed by property managers as part of the apartment complex rental pool. All rental enquiries are managed and responded to by the dedicated property manager.

Each income year, Viraji blocks out 4 weeks so she can use the apartment for her own holiday. She selects a period during the year when demand for her apartment is generally low. Viraji also occasionally stays at the apartment when visiting the area if it isn't already booked out or rented. Viraji's property is regularly rented on a short-stay basis and has a high occupancy rate during the income year.

As Viraji uses the property for holidays, it is a holiday home.

Viraji is using the apartment mainly or holding it for use to produce rental income. This is because Viraji's use of the property and how she holds it for use shows that she prioritises renting the property and generating rental income over her personal use.

Viraji can claim a deduction for the expenses she has incurred in earning rental income from her Gold Coast apartment. Viraji can't claim a deduction for the expenses incurred during the periods that Viraji uses the property herself. Her expenses will need to be apportioned to take her personal use into account.

End of example

 

Example 9: limited personal use with high occupancy during peak periods - government restrictions

Bindi and Ash live in Sydney and own a house in a regional town close to several bushwalking tracks. There are government restrictions and rules for short-term rental properties located in the regional area where the property is located which limit short-term stays of less than 21 days to a maximum of 180 days per year. Where a booking is for 21 or more consecutive days, those days do not count towards the 180-day limit.

Tourist demand is highest during the warmer summer months up to the end of the Easter school holidays, allowing the property to be rented at higher market rates. To maximise occupancy and rental income, Bindi and Ash advertise the property through a local real estate agent specialising in holiday accommodation and also list it on several sharing economy platforms. The property has a high occupancy rate during this period.

During periods of high rental demand, Bindi and Ash do not block out the property for their personal use. However, they will stay at the property for one week during peak periods if it is not already booked or rented.

Outside peak periods, when demand for the property is lower, Bindi and Ash block out a total of 4 weeks for personal use while they are on holiday. At all other times, they actively manage the property to maximise rental income.

Once the 180-day limit is reached, Bindi and Ash continue to advertise the property for rent but restrict bookings to stays of 21 or more consecutive days to comply with the local government requirements. To maximise the income they receive in the off season, they vary the rental rate to attract bookings.

Because Bindi and Ash use the house for their holidays and recreation, it is a holiday home. Bindi and Ash’s claim for deductions relating to the property would not be denied because it is a holiday home that they use (or hold for use) mainly to produce income from rent. Their use of the property shows clear prioritisation of income-producing use over personal use.

Bindi and Ash will still need to apportion their deductions to account for their personal use of the property.

End of example

 

 

Example 10: not mainly used (or held for use) for rental

Josh lives in Perth and owns a beach house in Busselton, Western Australia. The beach house is advertised for rent year-round through an agent and on sharing economy platforms. The beach house is highly desirable during the summer months and can be rented at a higher rate during this time. The beach house is always blocked out for use by Josh and his family and friends at Christmas and Easter, and during summer school holiday periods.

Josh and his family don't always use the property for the blocked-out dates, but Josh has instructed his agent not to let the property during these times just in case they wish to use it at short notice. Josh is very selective about who can rent the property and rejects many of the booking enquiries he receives. On average, the beach house is rented out to unrelated guests for about 10 weeks during the income year.

Because Josh uses the beach house for his and his families' holidays and recreation, it is a holiday home. Josh is prioritising his personal use of the property over any income-earning use. The beach house is a holiday home that is not mainly being used (or held for use) to produce assessable income.

Josh must include any rent derived from the beach house in assessable income but he can't claim a deduction for his ownership and use expenses for the property.

Josh can claim the expenses which are solely incurred when he rents the beach house, for example, the sharing platform’s service fees or commission and cleaning expenses after renting out to guests.

End of example

 

Example 11: not mainly used (or held for use) for rental

James and Elim have 2 school age children and own a holiday house near the beach. The house is in an area that is popular with summer holiday makers but the property is only accessible by 4-wheel drive vehicle.

During the year James and Elim advertise the property for rent through a local real estate agent. However, James and Elim advise the agent not to rent the property out during school holiday periods. They want to reserve the property for their own use.

While there would be demand for the property during the summer holiday period, there is little demand at other times of the year because of the small number of holiday makers to the area and the limited access to the property.

The house isn't rented out at all during the income year.

James and Elim's can't claim any deductions for the property. However, James and Elim should keep records of their expenses. When they sell the property, a proportion of the expenses (such as interest, insurance, maintenance costs and council rates) they haven't been able to claim as a deduction may be taken into account in working out their capital gain or capital loss.

End of example

 

For more information on holiday homes and how to apportion deductions for holiday homes, see:

  • Holiday homes
  • How to claim rental deductions
  • Taxation Ruling TR 2026/1 Income tax: rental property income and deductions for individuals who are not in business
  • Practical Compliance Guideline PCG 2026/2 Apportionment of rental property deductions - ATO compliance approach
  • Practical Compliance Guideline PCG 2026/3 Application of section 26-50 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 to holiday homes that you also rent out - ATO compliance approach

Deductions for vacant land

For vacant land you held both before and from 1 July 2019, deductions for expenses you incur for holding the vacant land are only available in certain circumstances.

Land is vacant if, at the time you incur the expense the land either:

  • doesn't contain a substantial and permanent structure
  • contains a residential premises which isn't in use or available for use
  • contains a residential premises constructed or substantially renovated while you're holding the land, and the premises are either  
    • not lawfully able to be occupied
    • lawfully able to be occupied but not rented out or made available for rent.

The expenses involved in holding vacant land include:

  • ongoing borrowing costs, including interest payments on money borrowed for the acquisition of the land
  • land taxes
  • council rates
  • maintenance costs.

The expenses involved in holding vacant land don't include:

  • the costs of repairing, renovating or constructing a structure on the land
  • any interest or borrowing costs associated with repairs, renovation or construction of a structure on the land.

You can still deduct vacant land holding costs if:

  • the land is held by an 'excluded entity', that is a
    • corporate tax entity
    • super plan (other than a self-managed super fund)
    • managed investment trust
    • public unit trust
    • unit trust or partnership of which all the members are corporate tax entities, super plans (other than self-managed super funds), managed investment trusts or public unit trusts
  • the use of the land is to carry on a business by
    • you
    • your affiliate or an entity of which you're an affiliate
    • your spouse or child under 18 years old
    • an entity connected with you
  • you, an affiliate (from the list above), spouse or child, or an entity connected with you, are carrying on a business of primary production and you lease, hire or licence the land to another entity
  • you make the land available at arm's length to a business for use in that business
  • the land had a substantial and permanent structure but due to an exceptional circumstance (such as a natural disaster, major building fire or substantial building defects) the land is vacant.

For more information, see:

Expenses for which you can claim an immediate deduction

You may be able to claim an immediate deduction in the income year you incur the expense for:

You can claim only a deduction for these expenses if you incur them and they're not paid or reimbursed by the tenant.

If your rental property is a holiday home, you can't claim ownership and use expenses as a deduction if the property isn't used or held for use mainly to produce assessable rental income. For more information, see holiday homes and Ownership and use expenses for your holiday home.

Expenses before the property is used or held to earn rental income

You can claim expenditure such as interest on loans, local council, water and sewerage rates and charges, land taxes and emergency service levies you incur prior to using the property provided you are holding it to produce assessable rental income. You must incur these expenses with the intent to rent out the property. Evidence of you holding the property to produce assessable rental income, such as communications with real estate agents or rental managers, must be kept.

You won't be holding the property to produce assessable rental income if you have decided not to rent it out - for example, if you decide to use the property for private purposes.

If the land is vacant under the vacant land provisions, you generally can't claim deductions for expenses incurred in holding the land before the property can be occupied and held to produce assessable rental income.

If your rental property is also a holiday home, you may not be able to claim your ownership and use expenses. For more information, see Holiday homes.

Asbestos remediation

Work undertaken to an investment property in dealing with asbestos may, in some cases, be a deductible repair. This depends on the nature or extent of the remediation process.

Where the expenditure isn't otherwise deductible as a repair, a deduction may be available as an ‘environmental protection activity’.

If you use your property partly to produce income and partly for private purposes, you need to apportion your expenses.

For more information, see Taxation Ruling TR 2020/2 Income tax: deductions for expenditure on environmental protection activities.

Body corporate fees and charges

Strata title body corporates are constituted under the strata title legislation of the various states and territories.

You may be able to claim a deduction for body corporate fees and charges you incur for your rental property.

Body corporate fees and charges may be incurred to cover the cost of day-to-day administration and maintenance or for a special purpose.

Regular payments you make to body corporate administration funds or general-purpose sinking funds for ongoing administration and general maintenance are payments for the provision of services by the body corporate. You can claim a deduction for these regular payments at the time you incur them. However, if you're required by the body corporate to pay a special levy to fund a particular capital improvement, these levies aren't deductible. This is the case whether that special levy is paid into a special purpose fund or as a special contribution to the general-purpose sinking fund.

If the body corporate raises a special levy to fund certain types of construction costs, you may be able to claim a capital works deduction. You can only claim a capital works deduction once the work is completed and the cost has been charged to either:

  • the special purpose fund
  • the general-purpose sinking fund, if a special contribution has been levied.

You can't also claim a deduction if the body corporate fees and charges you incur are for things like:

  • the maintenance of common gardens
  • deductible repairs and building insurance.

For example, you can't claim a separate deduction for common garden maintenance if that expense is already included in body corporate fees and charges.

If you use your property partly to produce income and partly for private purposes, you need to apportion your body corporate fees and charges.

Common property

Common property is that part of a strata plan not comprised in any proprietor's lot. It includes stairways, lifts, passages, common garden areas, common laundries and other facilities intended for common use.

The ownership of the common property varies according to the relevant state strata title legislation. However, in all states, the income derived from the use of the common property is income of lot owners.

You can claim deductions for the common property in proportion to your lot entitlement for:

  • capital works
  • the decline in value of depreciating assets (in some cases).

For more information, see Deduction for decline in value of depreciating assets.

For more information on strata title body corporates, see Taxation Ruling TR 2015/3 Income tax: matters relating to strata title bodies constituted under strata title legislation.

Interest on loans

If you take out a loan to purchase a rental property, you can claim the interest charged on that loan, or a portion of the interest, as a deduction. However, the property must be rented, or available for rent on commercial terms, in the income year for which you claim a deduction. You can't claim a deduction for interest expenses you incur if either:

If the expenses were incurred partly for investment and partly for private purposes, you must apportion the expense accordingly. For more information, see Investment loan used for private purpose.

While the property is used or held for rent on commercial terms, you may also claim interest charged on loans taken out:

  • to purchase depreciating assets
  • for repairs
  • for renovations.

Similarly, if you take out a loan to finance renovations to a property you intend to rent out, the interest on the loan will be deductible from the time you took the loan out. However, if your intention changes while you hold the property, for example, you decide to use the property for private purposes and you no longer use it to produce rent or other income, you can't claim the interest after your intention changes.

If you prepay interest, it may not be deductible all at once, see Prepaid expenses.

If you co-own the property, see Co-ownership of rental property for more information on how to calculate your deduction for interest expenses.

Redraws from a loan

Banks and other lending institutions offer a range of financial products which can be used to acquire a rental property. Many of these products have features which permit flexible repayment and redraw options. For example, you might use a loan facility you obtained to purchase both a rental property and a car for your private use. In cases of this type, the interest on the loan must be apportioned into deductible and non-deductible parts according to the amounts borrowed for the rental property and for private purposes. A simple example of the necessary calculation for apportionment of interest is in example 12. If you have a loan account that has a fluctuating balance due to a variety of deposits and withdrawals, and it's used for both private purposes and rental property purposes, you must keep accurate records. This enables you to calculate the interest that applies to the rental property portion of the loan. You must separate the interest that relates to the rental property from any interest that relates to your private use of the funds.

For more information on how to calculate interest for these types of products, see Taxation Ruling TR 2000/2 Income tax: deductibility of interest on moneys drawn down under line of credit facilities and redraw facilities.

You may borrow money to buy a new home and then rent out your previous home. If there is an outstanding balance on the loan you had to purchase the previous home and the property is now used to produce income, the interest on the outstanding loan balance, or part of the interest, will be deductible. However, an interest deduction can't be claimed on the loan you use to buy the new home because it isn't used to produce income. This is the case whether or not the loan for the new home is secured against the former home.

Example 12: apportionment of interest

Norman and Lucinda decide to use their bank’s ‘Mortgage breaker’ account to take out a loan of $209,000 from which $170,000 is to be used to buy a rental property as joint tenants and $39,000 is to be used to purchase a car they will only use for private purposes. They will need to work out each year how much of their interest payments are deductible. The following whole-year example illustrates an appropriate method that could be used to calculate the proportion of interest that is deductible. The example assumes an interest rate of 6.75% per annum on the loan and that the property is rented from 1 July:

Interest for year 1 = $209,000 × 6.75% = $14,108

Apportionment of interest payments related to rental property:

Total interest expenses × (rental property loan ÷ total borrowings) = deductible interest

$14,108 × ($170,000 ÷ $209,000) = $11,475

Norman and Lucinda can each claim 50% of $11,475 ($5,737.50) as a deduction for the interest expense for the rental property.

End of example

Linked or split loans

Some financial institutions offer more complicated investment loan interest payment arrangements, like 'linked' or 'split' loans which involve 2 or more loans or sub-accounts in which one is used for private purposes and the other for income producing purposes. Repayments are allocated to the private account while the unpaid interest on the income producing account is capitalised. This is designed to allow you to pay off your private home loan faster while deferring payments on your investment rental property loan, maximising your potential interest deduction by creating interest on interest.

This can artificially produce a tax benefit because the interest actually incurred on the investment property loan is greater than the amount of interest that might reasonably be expected to have been incurred but for using the loan arrangement outlined above. In this case we may disallow some or all of your interest deductions. You should seek advice from your recognised tax adviser or contact us to discuss your situation.

For more information, see

  • Rental expenses you can claim now – interest expenses.
  • Taxation Determination TD 2012/1 Income tax: can Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 apply to deny a deduction for some, or all, of the interest expense incurred in respect of an 'investment loan interest payment arrangement' of the type described in this Determination?

Co-borrower required by lender

For financial reasons, your lender may require you to have another person named on your loan.

Where a co-borrower is named on the loan to assist you to obtain finance, but is not listed on the title, a legally enforceable written agreement may allow you to claim all the interest expenses. The agreement would need to outline that the full beneficial ownership lies with you. The agreement must be in place when the loan is obtained.

The agreement should state you are 100% liable for the loan repayments, interest and expenses.

Example 13: joint borrowers, sole owner – claiming all interest incurred

Simone decides to purchase a rental property. When she approaches her bank for a loan, they require her husband Jarrod to be a co-borrower, even though the legal title to the rental property will be solely in Simone’s name.

When Simone and Jarrod enter into the loan agreement with the bank, they also enter into a separate legally enforceable written agreement with each other. The agreement is witnessed by a justice of the peace and states that Simone, as the sole owner of the rental property, is 100% liable for the loan repayments and interest.

As the sole owner of the property, Simone must declare 100% of the rental income in her tax return.

Simone can also claim a deduction for 100% of the interest expenses. Simone's agreement with Jarrod shows her intention to be liable for all the loan repayments and interest charged on the loan. Simone's bank statements also support her intention as they show that she paid all the repayments and interest expenses from her own bank account.

End of example

Thin capitalisation

If you're an Australian resident and you or any associate entities have certain international dealings, overseas interests or if you're a foreign resident, then thin capitalisation rules may affect you if your debt deductions, such as interest, combined with those of your associate entities for 2025–26 are more than $2,000,000.

Companies, partnerships and trusts that have international dealings will need to complete the International dealings schedule 2026.

For more information on the deductibility of interest, see:

  • Taxation Ruling TR 2004/4 Income tax: deductions for interest incurred prior to the commencement of, or following the cessation of, relevant income earning activities
  • Taxation Ruling TR 2000/2 Income tax: deductibility of interest on moneys drawn down under line of credit facilities and redraw facilities
  • Taxation Ruling TR 98/22 Income tax: the taxation consequences for taxpayers entering into certain linked or split loan facilities
  • Taxation Ruling TR 95/25 Income tax: deductions for interest under section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 following FC of T v. Roberts; FC of T v. Smith
  • Taxation Ruling TR 2019/2 Income tax: whether penalty interest is deductible
  • Taxation Determination TD 1999/42 Income tax: do the principles set out in Taxation Ruling TR 98/22 apply to line of credit facilities?
  • Taxation Determination TD 2012/1 Income tax: can Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 apply to deny a deduction for some, or all, of the interest expense incurred in respect of an 'investment loan interest payment arrangement' of the type described in this Determination?
  • Rental expenses you can claim now – interest expenses.

If you need help to calculate your interest deduction, seek advice from your recognised tax adviser or contact us to discuss your situation.

Land tax and other State and Territory charges

Land tax liabilities may be deductible, depending on when the land tax liability arises. The timing of when you incur a liability to pay land tax will depend on the relevant state legislation. Your liability to pay land tax generally doesn't rely on the lodgment of a land tax return or on the taxing authority issuing a land tax assessment. In many states, the year in which the property is used for the relevant purposes determines when you're liable, even if an assessment doesn't issue until a later date.

When you receive land tax assessments in arrears, the amount of land tax isn't deductible in the income year in which you pay the arrears. The land tax amounts are deductible in the respective income years to which the liability for the land tax relates. For more information on how to claim a deduction for land tax related to a previous income year, see How to request an amendment to your tax return.

If a landowner receives a land tax assessment for a year, then later in the same income year either sells the property or starts to use it as their residence, there is no requirement to apportion the land tax deduction. We consider that at the time the land tax liability was incurred, it was for an income producing purpose because the liability for it was founded in the property's use for income-producing purposes.

If you receive a land tax credit or adjustment when the property is sold, the recovered amount should be included in your rental income.

Some people living overseas may also be changed a Surcharge land tax for their rental property. As this is imposed on an individual basis it may not be imposed on all the co-owners of the property. The surcharge is deductible to the owner(s) it is imposed on.

A State levy may be imposed if you rent your property out for short-term stays. Such levies may be paid directly by the owner or through the booking agent, if one is used. If a State levy is imposed, you can claim a deduction for the levies you are charged.

A vacant property tax is not generally deductible as the property is not earning assessable income for a significant period of the year.

Lease document expenses

Your share of the costs of preparing and registering a lease and the cost of stamp duty on a lease are deductible to the extent that you have used, or will use, the property to produce income. This also includes any costs associated with an assignment or surrender of a lease.

For example, freehold title can't be obtained for properties in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). They're commonly acquired under a 99-year crown lease. Therefore, stamp duty, preparation and registration costs you incur on the lease of an ACT property are deductible to the extent that you use the property as a rental property.

For more information on how to apportion lease document expenses if you use your property partly to produce income and partly for private purposes, see Apportionment of rental expenses.

Legal expenses

Some legal expenses you incur in producing your rental income are deductible. These include the costs of:

  • evicting a non-paying tenant
  • taking court action for recovery of loss of rental income
  • defending damages claims for injuries suffered by a third party on your rental property.

However, most legal expenses related to rental properties are of a capital nature and are therefore not deductible. These include costs of:

  • purchasing or selling your property
  • resisting land resumption
  • defending your title to the property.

For more information, see Rental expenses you can claim now.

Non-deductible legal expenses that are capital in nature may form part of the cost base of your property for capital gains tax purposes.

For more information, see Capital gains tax and Guide to capital gains tax 2026.

Example 14: deductible legal expenses

In September 2025, Ted and Rachel's tenants moved out of their jointly owned property, owing 6 weeks rent. Ted and Rachel retained the bond money and took the tenants to court to terminate the lease and recover the balance of the rent outstanding. The legal expenses they incurred are fully deductible.

Ted and Rachel were seeking to recover rental income, and they wished to continue earning income from the property. Ted and Rachel must include their share of the retained bond money and any amount of rent recovered from the legal proceedings in their rental income in the year of receipt.

End of example

Mortgage discharge expenses

Mortgage discharge expenses are the costs involved in a lender, such as a bank, discharging a mortgage over a property and are separate to payments of principal and interest on the loan. These costs are deductible in the year they're incurred to the extent that you took out the mortgage as security for the repayment of money you borrowed to produce your rental income.

For example, if you used a property to produce rental income for half the time you held it and as your holiday home for the other half of the time, 50% of the costs of discharging the mortgage are deductible.

For more information on how to apportion your mortgage discharge expenses, see Apportionment of rental expenses.

Mortgage discharge expenses may also include penalty interest payments. Penalty interest payments are amounts paid to a lender, to agree to accept early repayment of a loan, including a loan on a rental property. The amounts are commonly calculated by reference to the number of months that interest payments would have been made had the premature repayment not been made.

Penalty interest payments on a loan relating to a rental property are deductible if either:

  • the loan moneys borrowed are secured by a mortgage over the property and the payment effects the discharge of the mortgage
  • payment is made to rid the taxpayer of a recurring obligation to pay interest on the loan.

For more information, see Taxation Ruling TR 2019/2 Income tax: whether penalty interest is deductible.

Property agent fees or commissions

You can claim the cost of fees, such as regular management fees or commissions, you pay to a property agent or real estate agent for managing, inspecting or collecting rent for a rental property on your behalf.

You're unable to claim the cost of:

  • commissions or other costs paid to a real estate agent or other person for the sale or disposal of a rental property
  • buyer's agent fees paid to any entity or person you engage to find you a suitable rental property to purchase.

These costs may form part of the cost base of your property for capital gains purposes.

Repairs and maintenance

Expenditure for repairs you make to the property may be deductible. However, generally the repairs must relate directly to wear and tear or other damage that occurred as a result of your renting out the property.

Repairs generally involve restoring a defective, damaged or deteriorated item back to working condition and often require the replacement or renewal of a worn out or broken part, for example, replacing worn or damaged roof tiles or fixing an air conditioner that is no longer working. Maintenance generally involves keeping the property in a tenantable condition, for example repainting faded or damaged interior walls.

If your property is your holiday home, you can't claim deductions for repairs and maintenances unless the property is used (or held for use) mainly to produce rental income.

However, expenses which are capital, or of a capital nature aren't deductible as repairs or maintenance. The following are examples of expenses which are capital or of a capital nature:

  • replacement of an entire structure or unit of property (such as a complete fence or building, a stove, kitchen cupboards or curtains)
  • improvements, renovations, extensions and alterations
  • initial repairs – for example, in remedying defects, damage or deterioration that existed at the date you acquired the property.

Replacing an entire structure or unit of property that is a depreciating asset, for example a stove or an air conditioner, may trigger a balancing adjustment event. You may also claim a decline in value deduction for the replacement depreciating asset. For more information, see Guide to depreciating assets 2026.

You may be able to claim some construction expenses as capital works deductions where the expenses are capital or of a capital nature. For more information, see Capital works deductions.

Expenses of a capital nature may form part of the cost base of the property for capital gains tax purposes (but not generally to the extent that capital works deductions have been or can be claimed for them).

You can't claim a deduction for repairs if your insurer pays for the work. If you receive an insurance or compensation payment for work you paid for and claimed as a deduction in an earlier year, you need to include it in your income.

For more information, see Capital gains tax guide 2026.

Example 15: repairs before renting out the property

Lindsay and Bernadette needed to do some repairs to their newly acquired rental property before the first tenants moved in. They paid an interior decorator to repaint dirty walls, replace broken light fittings and repair doors on 2 bedrooms.

They also discovered white ants in some of the floorboards. This required white ant treatment and replacement of some of the boards.

These expenses were incurred to make the property suitable to be rented out and didn't arise from Lindsay and Bernadette's use of the property to generate rental income. The expenses are initial repairs and are capital in nature. Lindsay and Bernadette aren't able to claim a deduction for these expenses. However, they can be included in the cost base of the property when they sell it.

End of example

 

Example 16: replacement of an entirety (capital works) and simultaneous repairs

Robin has owned his rental property for 10 years when a toilet is damaged along with the wall around it. The toilet needs to be replaced, and the wall repaired.

The toilet is a fixture but also an entirety because:

• it's identifiable as a separate item of capital equipment,

• it provides a useful function independent of the rest of the premises

Replacing an entirety isn't a repair. The cost of installing the new toilet is claimed as a capital works deduction.

The wall around the toilet is replastered and painted at the same time as the toilet is installed. As plastering and painting the wall restores it to its former function, Robin can claim the cost as a repair expense.

Robin should obtain an itemised invoice which separately lists the costs of replacing the toilet and wall repair so they can be claimed correctly. If the cost of the labour isn't separately identified, it should be apportioned between the 2 different jobs (replacing the toilet and replastering and repainting the wall) on a fair and reasonable basis.

If Robin’s insurance company directly engages and pays a tradesperson to replace the toilet and do the wall repairs, Robin can’t claim a capital works deduction for the new toilet or a deduction for the repairs.

End of example

 

Example 17: restoration by replacing a part of the entirety – roof repair

Rosie has owned a rental property since 2012. The roof was old, but in good condition, when a storm dislodged and damaged many of the roof tiles. A roof tiler advises Rosie the most cost-effective solution is to replace the entire roof. The new roof tiles are of a more modern design and due to manufacturing advances, provide a minor improvement to the insulation of the house.

Replacing the roof is deductible as a repair expense. Something that is part of a building and serves no independent function, such as a roof or a wall, is simply a part of the entirety. Even though the new roof performs its function more effectively, this is only minor and incidental due to the use of modern materials.

Rosie pays for the work and claims a deduction. The following year she receives an insurance payout for the repair. Rosie includes this payout in her income in the year she receives it.

End of example

Repairs to a rental property will generally be deductible if:

  • the property continues to be rented on an ongoing basis, or
  • the property remains available for rent on commercial terms but there is a short period when the property is unoccupied, for example, where unseasonable weather causes cancellations of bookings or advertising is unsuccessful in attracting tenants.

Expenditure for repairs you make to the property may also be deductible where the expenditure is incurred in a year of income that the property is held for income producing purposes, even though the property has previously been held by you for private purposes, and some or all of the damage is attributable to when the property was held for private purposes.

If you no longer rent the property, the cost of repairs may still be deductible provided:

  • the need for the repairs is related to the period during which the property was used by you to produce income
  • the property was income-producing during the income year in which you incurred the cost of repairs.

Examples of repairs for which you can claim deductions are:

  • replacing a cracked pane in a window
  • stopping a tap from leaking
  • repairing an electrical appliance.

Examples of improvements for which you can't claim deductions are:

  • landscaping
  • insulating the house
  • renovating a kitchen or bathroom

For more information, see:

Travel and car expenses

Travel expenses relating to a residential rental property are generally not deductible.

You may be entitled to claim a deduction for travel expenses you incur relating to your rental property if one of the following applies:

  • you're an excluded entity
  • you're using the property in carrying on a business (including a business of letting rental properties)
  • the property isn't a residential rental property.

Travel expenses include the costs of travel to inspect, maintain or collect rent for the property.

If you're entitled to claim a deduction for a travel expense relating to your rental property, you should claim it as follows:

  • You're allowed a full deduction where the sole purpose of the trip relates to the rental property. However, in other circumstances you may not be able to claim a deduction, or you may be only entitled to a partial deduction.
  • If you fly to inspect your rental property, stay overnight, and return home on the following day, all of the airfares and accommodation expenses would generally be allowed as a deduction provided the sole purpose of your trip was to inspect your rental property.

Example 18: travel and vehicle expenses

In 2025–26, Narinda owned a residential rental property in North Harbour and a commercial property in East Village.

Narinda visited the residential rental property several times during the year after the tenants moved in to carry out inspections and maintenance work. Narinda can't claim deductions for the cost of his travel to inspect and maintain the property.

Narinda also visited the commercial property a few times after the tenants moved in, to carry out minor repairs. He travelled 162 kilometres during the course of these visits. The property is a commercial property, so Narinda can claim the following deduction.

Distance travelled × rate per km = deductible amount

162 km × 88c per km = $143

On his way to golf each Saturday, Narinda drove past the property to ‘keep an eye on things’. These motor vehicle expenses aren't deductible as they're incidental to the private purpose of the journey.

End of example

For the appropriate cents per kilometre rates, see:

Apportionment of travel expenses

Where travel related to your commercial rental property or to your residential rental property used in carrying on a business of letting rental properties is combined with a holiday or other private activities, you may need to apportion the expenses.

If you travel to inspect the property and combine this with a holiday, you need to take into account the reasons for your trip. If the main purpose of your trip is to have a holiday and the inspection of the property is incidental to that main purpose, you can't claim a deduction for the cost of the travel. However, you may be able to claim local expenses directly related to the property inspection and a proportion of your accommodation expenses.

You may also need to apportion your travel expenses if they relate partly to your commercial rental property or residential rental property used in carrying on a business of letting rental properties, and partly to residential rental property not used in carrying on a business of letting rental properties.

For more information, see Law Companion Ruling LCR 2018/7 Residential premises deductions: travel expenditure relating to rental investment properties.

Example 19: apportionment of travel expenses

Chad and Jacinta own a residential rental property and a commercial rental property in a resort town on the north coast of Queensland. They spent $1,000 on airfares and $1,500 on accommodation (including meals) travelling from their home in Perth to the resort town, mainly for the purpose of holidaying, but also to inspect both properties.

They also spent $50 on taxi fares for the return trip from the hotel to the commercial rental property, and $100 on taxi fares for a return trip from the hotel to the residential rental property. Chad and Jacinta spent one day on matters relating to the commercial rental property, another day on matters relating to the residential rental property, and 8 days swimming and sightseeing.

They can't claim a deduction for:

  • any part of the $1,000 airfares.
  • any part of the $100 taxi fare, it's a travel expense related to the residential rental property.

However, Chad and Jacinta can claim a deduction for the $50 taxi fare which they incur for the commercial rental property.

A deduction for 10% (1 day ÷ 10 days) of the accommodation (including meals) expenses (10% of $1,500 = $150) would be reasonable in the circumstances given Chad and Jacinta spent one full day on matters relating to their commercial property.

The total travel expenses Chad and Jacinta can claim are therefore $200 ($50 taxi fare plus $150 accommodation). Accordingly, they can each claim a deduction of $100.

End of example

For more information, see Rental properties and travel expenses.

Local government expenses

You can claim a deduction for local government rates and levies for the period your property is used (or held for use) to produce rental income.

If your property is your holiday home, you can't claim deductions for local government expenses unless the property is used (or held for use) mainly to produce rental income.

Where you fail to pay local government rates and charges for the property by the due dates you may become liable to pay interest charges under the relevant legislation, you can claim these interest charges as a tax deduction. A deduction isn't excluded by the penalty provisions of the tax law. We don't consider the imposition of interest in these circumstances a pecuniary punishment for a breach of the Local Government Act but rather an administrative charge recognising the time value of money. The use of a time factor in the calculation is designed to compensate the local government for the full amount of rates not having been paid by the due date. Therefore the interest payment is deductible to the taxpayer in the year in which it's incurred.

If the local council where your rental property is located imposes an annual emergency services levy, you can claim a deduction for that amount. An emergency services levy is a charge imposed by a local council on property owners to meet some of the costs for the provision of emergency services by the Country Fire Authority, the Metropolitan Fire Authority, the Police Force and other agencies. It's often calculated based on the value of the land and charged annually. We consider it's an ongoing expense incurred in the course of earning your rental income and is therefore a deductible expense.

If you use your property partly to produce income and partly for private purposes, you need to apportion your expenses.

Expenses deductible over several income years

There are 3 types of expenses you may incur for your rental property that may be claimed over several income years:

We discuss each of these categories in detail below.

Borrowing expenses

Borrowing expenses are those costs you incur in taking out a loan for a rental property.

If your property is your holiday home, you can't claim deductions for borrowing expenses unless the property is used (or held for use) mainly to produce rental income.

Amounts you can claim a deduction for include:

  • loan establishment fees
  • title search fees your lender charges
  • costs for preparing and filing mortgage documents
  • mortgage broker fees
  • stamp duty you pay on the mortgage
  • fees for a valuation required for loan approval
  • lender's mortgage insurance the lender takes out and bills to you.

The following amounts are not borrowing expenses:

  • the principal amount you borrow and any repayments you make on a loan
  • insurance policy premiums that pay your loan on the property in the event that you die or become disabled or unemployed
  • interest expenses
  • stamp duty you pay on the transfer of the property
  • stamp duty you incur to acquire a leasehold interest in property (such as an ACT 99-year Crown lease).

If your total borrowing expenses are more than $100, the deduction is spread over 5 years (starting from the day when the loan is taken out) or the term of the loan, whichever is less. If the total deductible borrowing expenses are $100 or less, they're fully deductible in the income year you incur them. If you repay the loan early and in less than 5 years, you can claim a deduction for the balance of the borrowing expenses in the year the loan is repaid in full.

If you take out the loan part way through the income year, apportion the deduction for the first income year according to the number of days in the year that you had the loan.

You also need to apportion your borrowing expenses if you use your property partly to produce income and partly for private purposes.

You can use our Deductible borrowing expenses calculator This link will download a file to work out your claim.

Example 20: apportionment of borrowing expenses

Fiona and Max (as tenants in common each with a 50% interest) obtain a 20-year loan of $209,000 to purchase a rental property for $170,000 and a private car for $39,000.

They pay establishment fees, valuation fees and stamp duty on the mortgage. Their borrowing expenses on the loan total of $1,670.

As their borrowing expenses are more than $100, they must apportion their deduction for borrowing expenses over 5 years because that is less than the period of the loan (20 years).

As they use part of the loan ($39,000) for a private purpose, they can't claim a deduction for borrowing expenses on this portion of the loan.

Fiona and Max established the loan on 17 July; they work out the borrowing expenses deduction for the first year as follows:

Borrowing expenses × (number of relevant days in income year ÷ number of days remaining in the 5-year period) × (amount of rental property loan ÷ total amount borrowed) = deduction for the year.

They work out their borrowing expenses deduction for each income year as shown in the table below. Year 4 is a leap year.

Borrowing expenses calculation

Year

Calculation

Available deduction for the year

1

$1,670.00 × (349 ÷ 1,826) = $319.18
$319.18 × ($170,000 ÷ $209,000)

$259.62

2

$1,350.82 × (365 ÷ 1,477) = $333.82
$333.82 × ($170,000 ÷ $209,000)

$271.53

3

$1,017.00 × (365 ÷ 1,112) = $333.82
$333.82 × ($170,000 ÷ $209,000)

$271.53

4 (leap year)

$683.18 × (366 ÷ 747) = $334.73
$334.73 × ($170,000 ÷ $209,000)

$272.27

5

$348.45 × (365 ÷ 381) = $333.82
$333.82 × ($170,000 ÷ $209,000)

$271.53

6

$14.63 × (16 ÷ 16) = $14.63
$14.63 × ($170,000 ÷ $209,000)

$11.90

End of example

Deduction for decline in value of depreciating assets

You can deduct an amount equal to the decline in value in 2025–26 of a depreciating asset that you held at any time during the year. However, you reduce your deduction to the extent you use the asset for a purpose other than a taxable purpose. From 1 July 2017, you reduce your deduction by the extent you installed or used the asset in your residential rental property to derive rental income and the asset was a second-hand depreciating asset (unless an exception applies).

For more information, see Limit on deductions for decline in value of second-hand depreciating assets.

When you purchase a rental property, you're generally treated for tax purposes as having bought a building, plus various separate items of 'plant'. Items of plant are depreciating assets, such as air conditioners, stoves and other items. You need to allocate the total purchase price of the property between the 'building' and the various depreciating assets. For more information on 'plant', see Descriptions and examples of rental property items.

We regard some items commonly found in a rental property as part of the setting for the rent-producing activity, therefore these items aren't treated as separate assets. If your depreciating assets aren't plant, and they're affixed to, or otherwise part of, a building or structural improvement, your expenditure will generally be construction expenditure for capital works. You may only claim a capital works deduction for those items.

For more information, see Capital works deductions.

Limit on deductions for decline in value of second-hand depreciating assets

There are different rules for the decline in value of certain second-hand depreciating assets you purchase with your residential rental property after 1 July 2017. If you use these assets to produce rental income from your residential rental property, you can't claim a deduction for their decline in value unless you're:

  • using the property in carrying on a business (including a business of letting rental properties)
  • an excluded entity.

For the meaning of 'residential rental property' and 'excluded entity', see Descriptions and examples of rental property items.

Second-hand depreciating assets are depreciating assets previously installed ready for use or used:

  • by another entity (except as trading stock)
  • in your private residence
  • for a non-taxable purpose, unless that use was occasional (for example, we would consider staying at the property for one evening while carrying out maintenance activities an occasional use).

These rules apply to the depreciating assets that you either:

  • enter into a contract to acquire, or otherwise acquired, after 7:30 pm on 9 May 2017
  • used or had installed ready for use for any private purpose in 2016–17 or earlier income years, for which you weren't entitled to a deduction for a decline in value in 2016–17 (for example, depreciating assets in a property that was your home in 2016–17 that you turned into your residential rental property in 2017–18).

Regardless of when you purchase the asset, you can claim a deduction for the decline in value of:

  • new depreciating assets in your residential property
  • depreciating assets in your residential rental property that you install or use for a taxable purpose other than the purpose of deriving rental income.
Example 21: new and second-hand depreciating assets

On 20 August 2025, Donna acquired a 2 year old apartment that she offers for residential rental accommodation. Depreciating assets in it includes carpet installed by the previous owner in July 2023. Donna installs the following depreciating assets in the apartment before renting it out:

  • new curtains that she bought from Curtains Ltd
  • a second-hand television that she bought from a friend
  • a second-hand clothes dryer from her house.

Donna uses the property including the depreciating assets to derive rental income from a residential rental property.

Donna can't claim deductions for the decline in value of the carpet, television set and clothes dryer as they're second-hand depreciating assets.

However, she can claim a decline in value deduction for the curtains as they were new when installed.

End of example

 

Example 22: established residential rental property purchase

Saania bought a one year old residential rental property for $500,000 on 1 July 2025 and rents it out. The property contains depreciating assets from the previous owner.

Since Saania bought the property after 9 May 2017, she can't claim deductions for the decline in value of any existing depreciating assets in the property.

End of example

Assets in new residential rental properties

If you acquire a newly built residential property from a developer, or buy a residential property that has been substantially renovated, you can claim a deduction for a decline in value of a depreciating asset in the property (or its common area) if:

  • no one was previously entitled to a deduction for the asset
  • either
    • no one resided in the property before you acquired it
    • the asset was installed for use or used at the property, and you acquired the property within 6 months of it being built or substantially renovated.

Substantial renovations of a building are renovations where you remove or replace all, or substantially all, of a building. The renovations may, but don't necessarily have to, involve the removal or replacement of foundations, external walls, interior supporting walls, floors, the roof or staircases.

For more information, see Goods and services tax ruling GSTR 2003/3 Goods and services tax: when is a sale of real property a sale of new residential premises?

Example 23: purchase of new apartments – one already tenanted, one vacant

On 10 December 2025, Tim bought 2 apartments from a developer 4 months after they were built. At the time of purchase, one apartment was rented out by the developer and the other was vacant.

Both of the apartments contain depreciating assets, such as curtains and furniture. The assets were installed before Tim bought the apartments. There are also shared areas in the apartment complex. The shared areas have a range of new depreciating assets that are joint property of all the apartment owners.

No taxpayer was entitled to a deduction for the decline in value of the depreciating assets in the apartments and the shared areas before Tim bought the apartments. This is because the:

  • apartments and the depreciating assets are part of the developer's trading stock
  • tenant doesn't hold the depreciating assets in the tenanted apartment.

For the vacant apartment and its shared areas, Tim is entitled to claim deductions for the decline in value of the depreciating assets.

For the tenanted apartment and its shared areas, Tim is entitled to claim deductions for the decline in value of the depreciating assets (although they have been used for 4 months) because:

  • no one was entitled to a deduction for a decline in value of these depreciating assets
  • the apartment was purchased by Tim within 6 months of it being built.

Tim can deduct only his share of the decline in value of the depreciating assets installed in the shared areas of the apartment complex.

If Tim sells the apartments, the next owner can't claim deductions for the decline in value of the existing depreciating assets, in either the apartments or in the shared areas.

End of example

How do you work out your deduction?

You work out your deduction for the decline in value of a depreciating asset using either the diminishing value method or the prime cost method. Both methods use the effective life of the asset. You can work out your deductions using the Depreciation and capital allowances tool. You can also use this tool during the year to progressively enter amounts.

Diminishing value method

The diminishing value method assumes that the decline in value each year is a constant proportion of the remaining value and produces a progressively smaller decline over time.

For depreciating assets you start to hold on or after 10 May 2006, you generally use the following formula for working out the decline in value using the diminishing value method:

Base value (see Note 1) × (days held (see Note 2) ÷ 365) × (200% ÷ asset's effective life)

Note 1: For the income year in which an asset is first used or installed ready for use for any purpose, the base value is the asset’s cost. For a later income year, the base value is the asset’s opening adjustable value plus any amounts included in the asset’s second element of cost for that year.

Note 2: Days held can be 366 in a leap year.

This formula doesn't apply in some cases, such as if you dispose of and reacquire an asset to work out the decline in value of the asset using this formula.

For depreciating assets you start to hold before 10 May 2006, the formula for working out decline in value using the diminishing value method is:

Base value (see Note 1) × (days held (see Note 2) ÷ 365) × (150% ÷ asset's effective life)

Under the diminishing value method, the decline in value of an asset for a particular income year can't amount to more than its base value for that income year.

Prime cost method

The prime cost method assumes that the value of a depreciating asset decreases uniformly over its effective life. The formula for working out decline in value using the prime cost method is:

Asset's cost × (days held (see Note 2 ÷ 365) × (100% ÷ asset's effective life)

The formula under the prime cost method may have to be adjusted if the cost, effective life or adjustable value of the asset is modified. For more information, see Guide to depreciating assets 2026.

Under the prime cost method, the general rule is that the decline in value of an asset for a particular income year can't exceed its opening adjustable value for that year and any amount included in the second element of its cost for that year. For an income year in which the asset start time occurs, the decline in value of the asset can't exceed its cost.

Elements of cost

An asset’s cost has 2 elements, the:

  • first element is generally, amounts you're taken to have paid to hold the asset, such as the purchase price.
  • second element is generally, the amount you're taken to have paid to bring the asset to its present condition, such as the cost of capital improvements to the asset.

If more than one person holds a depreciating asset, each holder works out their deduction for the decline in value of the asset based on their interest in the asset and not on the cost of the asset itself.

The adjustable value of a depreciating asset is its cost (first and second elements) less its decline in value up to that time. Adjustable value is similar to the concept of undeducted cost used in the former depreciation provisions. The opening adjustable value of an asset for an income year is generally the same as its adjustable value at the end of the previous income year.

Taxable purpose

A depreciating asset is used for a taxable purpose if it's used for the purpose of producing assessable income. For example, new carpet in a rental property which is used or held to produce assessable rental income, is used for a taxable purpose.

If you use a depreciating asset for a purpose other than a taxable purpose (for example, you use the same lawn mower at both your rental property and your private residence) you can only claim a partial deduction for the asset’s decline in value, using the percentage of the asset's total use that was for a taxable purpose.

If the asset is a second-hand depreciating asset you use to derive rental income from your residential property, you may not be able to claim a deduction for its decline in value. See Limit on deductions for decline in value of second-hand depreciating assets.

Effective life

Generally, the effective life of a depreciating asset is how long it can be used to produce income:

  • having regard to the wear and tear you reasonably expect from your expected circumstances of use
  • assuming that it will be maintained in reasonably good order and condition
  • having regard to the period within which it's likely to be scrapped, sold for no more than scrap value or abandoned.

Effective life can be expressed in whole years, or in fractions of years – for example, 5 and two-thirds. It isn't rounded to the nearest whole year.

For most depreciating assets you can choose to work out the effective life yourself or to use an effective life determined by the Commissioner of Taxation.

The information you could use to make an estimate of effective life of an asset is listed in Guide to depreciating assets 2026.

In making his determination, the Commissioner assumes the depreciating asset is new and has regard to general industry circumstances of use.

As a general rule, use the effective life that is in force at the time (the relevant time) you:

  • enter into a contract to acquire the depreciating asset
  • otherwise acquire it
  • start to construct it.

To make your own estimate of your asset's effective life or use the Commissioner's effective life determinations, see Effective life of depreciating assets.

Immediate deduction for certain non-business depreciating assets costing $300 or less

The decline in value of certain depreciating assets costing $300 or less is their cost. This means you get an immediate deduction for the cost of the asset to the extent that you use it to produce assessable income, including rental income, during the income year in which the deduction is available.

The immediate deduction is available if all the following tests are met for the asset:

  • it cost $300 or less
  • you used it mainly for the purpose of producing assessable income that wasn't income from carrying on a business (for example, rental income where your rental activities didn't amount to the carrying on of a business of letting rental properties)
  • it wasn't part of a set of assets costing more than $300 that you started to hold in the income year
  • it wasn't one of several identical, or substantially identical, assets that you started to hold in the income year that together cost more than $300.

If you hold an asset jointly with others and the cost of your interest in the asset is $300 or less, you can claim the immediate deduction even though the total cost of the asset was more than $300.

For more information, see Partners carrying on a business of letting rental properties.

Example 24: immediate deduction

In November 2025, Terry bought a new toaster for his rental property at a cost of $70. He can claim an immediate deduction as he uses the toaster to produce rental income, if he isn't carrying on a business of letting rental properties.

End of example

 

Example 25: no immediate deduction

Paula is buying a new set of 4 identical dining room chairs costing $90 each for her rental property. She can't claim an immediate deduction for any of these because they're part of a set, and the total cost is more than $300.

End of example

The amount of an immediate deduction may also need to be reduced if the asset is used for purposes other than taxable purposes (see subsection 40-25(2) of the ITAA 1997). For more information, see Limit on deductions for decline in value of second-hand depreciating assets.

For more information about immediate deductions for depreciating assets costing $300 or less, see Guide to depreciating assets 2026.

Low-value pooling

You can allocate low-cost assets and low-value assets relating to your rental activity to a low-value pool.

A low-cost asset is a depreciating asset that costs less than $1,000 as at the end of the income year in which you start to use it, or have it installed ready for use, for a taxable purpose.

A low-value asset is a depreciating asset that isn't a low-cost asset but which on 1 July 2025 (or 1 July of the relevant income year) had an opening adjustable value of less than $1,000 under the diminishing value method.

If you hold an asset jointly and the cost of your interest in the asset or the opening adjustable value of your interest is less than $1,000, you can allocate your interest in the asset to your low-value pool.

Once you choose to create a low-value pool and allocate a low-cost asset to it, you must pool all other low-cost assets you start to hold from that time on. However, this doesn't apply to low-value assets. You can decide whether to allocate low-value assets to the pool on an asset-by-asset basis.

Once you allocate an asset to the pool, it remains in the pool.

Once you allocate an asset to a low-value pool it isn't necessary to work out its adjustable value or decline in value separately. You only require one annual calculation for the decline in value for all of the depreciating assets remaining in the pool.

You work out the deduction for the decline in value of depreciating assets in a low-value pool using a diminishing value rate of 37.5%.

For the income year you allocate a low-cost asset to the pool, you work out its decline in value at a rate of 18.75%, or half the pool rate. Halving the rate recognises that you may allocate an asset to the pool throughout the income year and eliminates the need to make separate calculations for each asset using the actual date you allocate it to the pool.

When you first allocate a depreciating asset to a low-value pool, you must make a reasonable estimate of the percentage that you'll use the asset for a taxable purpose over its effective life (for a low-cost asset) or its remaining effective life (for a low-value asset). This percentage is known as the asset’s taxable use percentage.

From 1 July 2017, only include the taxable purpose of using the asset to produce rental income from residential rental property if you would be entitled to claim a deduction for the decline in value of that asset. See Limit on deductions for decline in value of second-hand depreciating assets. For the meaning of 'excluded entity' and 'residential rental property', see Descriptions and examples of rental property items.

It's this taxable use percentage of the cost or opening adjustable value that is written off through the low-value pool.

For more information on low-value pooling, and on how to treat assets you only use partly to produce assessable income, including rental income, and how to treat the disposal of assets from a low-value pool, see Guide to depreciating assets 2026.

You can work out your deduction for assets you allocate to a low-value pool using the Depreciation and capital allowances tool. You can also use this tool for each income year to calculate decline in value deduction amounts.

If you're an individual who owns or jointly owns a rental property, you claim your low-value pool deduction for rental assets as a ’Low-value pool deduction’ in your tax return. You don't take this deduction into account in the amount you show at 'Rent’ in your tax return.

What happens if you no longer hold or use a depreciating asset?

If you cease to hold or use a depreciating asset, a balancing adjustment event will occur. If there is a balancing adjustment event, you need to work out a balancing adjustment amount to include in your assessable income or to claim as a deduction.

A balancing adjustment event occurs for a depreciating asset if:

  • you stop holding it – for example, if the asset is sold, lost or destroyed
  • you stop using it and expect never to use it again
  • you stop having it installed ready for use and you expect never to install it ready for use again
  • you haven't used it and decide never to use it
  • a change occurs in the holding or interests in an asset which was or is to become a partnership asset.

You work out the balancing adjustment amount by comparing the asset’s termination value (such as the proceeds from the sale of the asset) and its adjustable value at the time of the balancing adjustment event. If the termination value is greater than the adjustable value, you include the excess in your assessable income. If you're an individual who owns or has co-ownership of a rental property, you show the assessable amount as 'Other income' in your tax return. You don't take it into account in the amount you show at 'Rent'.

If the termination value is less than the adjustable value, you can deduct the difference.

For more information on balancing adjustments, see Guide to depreciating assets 2026.

If a balancing adjustment event happens to a depreciating asset that you used at some time other than for income-producing purposes (for example, privately) then a capital gain or capital loss might arise to the extent that you used the asset for the other purpose.

From 1 July 2017, if a balancing adjustment event happens to a depreciating asset to which the rules about deductions for decline in value of second-hand depreciating assets in residential rental properties apply, then a capital gain or capital loss might arise.

You can work out balancing adjustments using the Depreciation and capital allowances tool.

For more information on capital gains tax and depreciating assets, see Guide to depreciating assets 2026.

Purchase and valuation of depreciating assets

Where you pay an amount for a depreciating asset and something else, only the part that is reasonably attributable to the depreciating asset is treated as its purchase value.

Where you purchase a rental property from an unrelated party, one objective means of establishing your cost of the depreciating assets acquired with the property is to have their value, as agreed between the contracting parties, specified in the sale agreement. The values need to be reasonable. If the sale agreement for your property doesn't specify separate values for the depreciating assets, you'll need to work out a reasonable cost for the assets to determine your claim for depreciation.

You can do this yourself or you may wish to use a qualified valuer. Any valuation methodology used to work out the cost of the depreciating assets must be able to demonstrate a reasonable basis for that value. For more information on valuing depreciating assets, see Market valuation for tax purposes.

Apportionment of values between various assets affects the cost base of the property which is subject to capital gains tax. Subtract any amounts you allocate to the cost of depreciating assets purchased with the rental property from the purchase price of the property, to work out the CGT cost base of the rental property.

Example 26: second-hand residential rental property purchase

On 1 October 2025, Nick and Penny bought a 2 year-old residential property for $500,000. The property was rented out before, and Nick and Penny continued to rent it out after they bought it.

Nick and Penny didn't purchase any new depreciating assets for the property. They used the existing depreciating assets in the property to derive rental income from the property. Nick and Penny didn't carry on a business of letting rental properties.

As Nick and Penny can't claim a deduction for a decline in value of any previously used depreciating assets in the property, they don't need to identify separate depreciating assets in the property.

They may need to hire a qualified professional to estimate construction costs of the property to work out if they can claim any capital works deductions. See, Estimating construction costs.

End of example

Working out your deductions for decline in value of depreciating assets

Below are 2 examples of how to work out decline in value deductions for new assets in newly built residential rental properties.

The Guide to depreciating assets 2026 has 2 worksheets:

  • Worksheet 1: Depreciating assets
  • Worksheet 2: Low-value pool.

Use these to work out your deductions for decline in value of depreciating assets. You can also work out your deductions using the Depreciation and capital allowances tool.

Example 27: working out decline in value deductions

Jason and his brother Rodney bought a newly built rental property on 20 July 2025 as tenants in common, with each of them owning 50%. They get a report from a professional that identifies the depreciating assets in the rental property and their cost.

Jason and Rodney use the report to work out the cost of their individual interests in the assets. They can each claim deductions for decline in value for 346 days of 2025–26. If they use the assets wholly to produce rental income, the deduction for each asset using the diminishing value method is worked out below.

Decline in value calculation using the diminishing value method

Calculation description

Furniture

Carpets

Curtains

Totals

Cost of the interest in the asset

$2,000

$1,200

$1,000

$4,200

Base value

$2,000

$1,200

$1,000

$4,200

Number of days held, divided by 365

346 ÷ 365

346 ÷ 365

346 ÷ 365

-

200% divided by effective life (years)

200% ÷ 13 and one-third

200% ÷ 8

200% ÷ 6

-

Deduction for decline in value

$284.45

$284.38

$315.98

$884.81

Adjustable value at end of 2025–26

$1,715.55

$915.62

$684.02

$3,315.19

As the adjustable values of the curtains and the carpets at the end of 2025–26 is less than $1,000, Jason and Rodney can each choose to transfer their interest in the curtains and the carpets to their low-value pool for 2026–27.

End of example

 

Example 28: decline in value deductions, low-value pool

In 2025–26, Leonie, who owns a rental property in Adelaide, allocated to a low-value pool some new depreciating assets she acquired in that year. The low-value pool already comprised various low-value assets. Leonie expects to use the assets solely to produce rental income.

Low-value asset decline in value calculation

Asset

Taxable use percentage of cost or opening adjustable value

Low-value pool rate

Deduction for decline in value in 2025–26

Various

$1,679

37.5%

$629.63

Low-cost asset decline in value calculation

Asset and purchase date

Taxable use percentage of cost or opening adjustable value

Low-value pool rate

Deduction for decline in value in 2025–26

Television set
(11/11/2025)

$747

18.75%

$140.06

Gas heater
(28/2/2026)

$303

18.75%

$56.81

Total low-cost assets

$1,050

18.75%

$196.87

Total deduction for decline in value for 2025–26

Total deduction for decline in value for 2025–26 is $826.50 ($629.63 plus $196.87).

Closing pool balance for 2025–26

Low-value assets: $1,679 minus $629.63 equals $1,049.37

Low-cost assets: $1,050 minus $196.87 equals $853.13

Closing pool balance for 2025–26 is $1,902.4 ($1,049.37 plus $853.13).

End of example

Capital works deductions

You can deduct certain kinds of construction expenditure. In the case of residential rental properties, the deductions would generally be spread over a period of 25 or 40 years. These amounts are referred to as capital works deductions. Your total capital works deductions can't exceed the construction expenditure for the property. No deduction is available until the construction is complete.

Deductions for construction expenditure apply to capital works such as:

  • a building or an extension – for example, adding a room, garage, patio or pergola
  • alterations, such as removing or adding an internal wall
  • structural improvements to the property – for example, adding a gazebo, carport, sealed driveway, retaining wall or fence.

You can only claim deductions for the period during the year that the property is used or held to produce rental income. You also need to apportion you deduction if only part of your property is used to produce income. Where the rental property is destroyed, for example by fire or a natural disaster event, and results in a total loss of the asset, you can claim a deduction in the income year the capital works are destroyed for construction expenditure that hasn't yet been deducted. However, you must reduce this deduction by any insurance and salvage receipts.

If however, using the same example above, during an income year the building is affected by fire and the building can't be rented or made available for rent, but it's expected to be made available for rent again, then you can't claim a deduction for capital works for the number of days that the building isn't available for rent.

If you claimed capital works deductions based on construction expenditure, you can't take that expenditure into account again in working out any other types of deductions you claim, such as deductions for decline in value of depreciating assets.

Amount of deduction

The amount of the deduction you can claim for an eligible new 'build to rent' development is 4%. This is a new measure which applies where construction of an eligible new build to rent development started after 9 May 2023. For further information see, Incentives to increase the supply of housing.

If it isn't an eligible new build to rent development, then the amount of deduction you can claim depends on the type of construction and the date construction started.

Table 1 below shows you the types of rental property construction that qualify. If the type of construction you own (or own jointly) doesn't appear next to the relevant ‘date construction started’ in the table, you can't claim a deduction. If the type of construction qualifies, Table 2 shows the rate of deduction available.

‘Certain buildings’ in Table 1 are:

  • apartment buildings in which you own or lease at least 10 apartments, units or flats, or
  • a hotel, motel or guest house that has at least 10 bedrooms.
Table 1: Types of rental property construction that qualify for deduction

Date construction started

Type of construction for which deduction can be claimed

Before 22 August 1979

None

22 August 1979 to 19 July 1982

Certain buildings intended to be used on completion to provide short-term accommodation to travellers

20 July 1982 to 17 July 1985

Certain buildings intended to be used on completion to provide short-term accommodation to travellers

Building intended to be used on completion for non-residential purposes (for example, a shop or office)

18 July 1985 to 26 February 1992

Any building intended to be used on completion for residential purposes or to produce income

27 February 1992 to 18 August 1992

Certain buildings intended to be used on completion to provide short-term accommodation to travellers

Any other building intended to be used on completion for residential purposes or to produce income

Structural improvements intended to be used on completion for residential purposes or to produce income

19 August 1992 to 30 June 1997

Certain buildings intended to be used on completion to provide short-term accommodation to travellers

Any other building intended to be used on completion for residential purposes or to produce income

Structural improvements intended to be used on completion for residential purposes or to produce income

Environment protection earthworks intended to be used on completion for residential purposes or to produce income

After 30 June 1997

Any capital works used to produce income (even if, on completion, it wasn't intended that they be used for that purpose)

Table 2: Rate of deduction based on date construction started

Date construction started

Rate of deduction per income year

Before 22 August 1979

nil

22 August 1979 to 21 August 1984

2.5%

22 August 1984 to 15 September 1987

4%

After 15 September 1987

2.5%, except 4% for eligible new build to rent developments where construction started after 9 May 2023

Where construction of a building to provide short-term accommodation for travellers commenced after 26 February 1992, the rate of deduction was increased to 4%.

For apartment buildings, the 4% rate applies to apartments, units or flats only if you own or lease 10 or more of them in the building.

The deduction can be claimed for:

  • 25 years from the date construction was completed in the case of a 4% deduction
  • 40 years from the date construction was completed in the case of a 2.5% deduction.

If the construction was completed part of the way through the income year, you can claim a pro-rata deduction for that part.

Construction expenditure that you can claim

Construction expenditure is the actual cost of constructing the building or extension. You can claim a deduction for expenditure you incur in the construction of a building if you contract a builder to construct the building on your land. This includes the component of your payments that represents the profit made by individual tradespeople, builders, and architects. If you're an owner/builder, the value of your contributions to the works – for example, your labour and expertise and any notional profit element, don't form part of the construction expenditure.

If you purchase your property from a speculative builder, you can't claim the component of your payment that represents the builder’s profit margin as a capital works deduction.

Some costs that you may include in construction expenditure are:

  • preliminary expenses such as architects’ fees, engineering fees and the cost of foundation excavations
  • payments to carpenters, bricklayers and other tradespeople for construction of the building
  • payments for the construction of retaining walls, fences and in-ground swimming pools.

Construction expenditure that can't be claimed

Some costs you can't include in construction expenditure are:

  • the cost of the land on which the rental property is built
  • expenditure on clearing the land before construction
  • earthworks that are permanent, can be economically maintained and aren't integral to the installation or construction of a structure
  • expenditure on landscaping.

Changes in building ownership

Where ownership of a building changes, the right to claim any undeducted construction expenditure for capital works passes to the new owner. The new owner should confirm that the building was constructed during one of the appropriate periods outlined in Table 1. To be able to claim the deduction, the new owner must continue to use the building to produce income.

If the previous owner was allowed capital works deductions, and the capital works started after 26 February 1992, they must give you, as the new owner, information that will enable you to calculate those deductions going forward. Where the property wasn't previously used to produce assessable income, the owner disposing of the property doesn't need to provide the purchaser with that information. In this situation the purchaser can get an estimate from a professional. For more information, see Estimating construction costs.

For more information on providing a notice or certificate, see Subsection 262A(4AJA) of Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936).

Estimating construction costs

Where a new owner can't precisely determine the construction expenditure associated with a building, an estimate provided by an appropriately qualified person may be used. Appropriately qualified people include:

  • a clerk of works, such as a project organiser for major building projects
  • a supervising architect who approves payments at stages of projects
  • a builder who is experienced in estimating construction costs of similar building projects
  • a quantity surveyor.

Unless they're otherwise qualified, valuers, real estate agents, accountants and solicitors generally have neither the relevant qualifications nor the experience to make such an estimate.

Example 29: estimating capital works deductions

A property acquired by Greg and Suzie (as joint tenants and not carrying on a business of letting rental properties) on 20 July 2025 was constructed in August 1991. At the time they acquired the property, it also contained the following structural improvements.

Structural improvements

Item

Construction date

Retaining wall

September 1991

Concrete driveway

January 1992

In-ground swimming pool

July 1992

Protective fencing around the pool

August 1992

Timber decking around the pool

September 1992

In a letter to Greg and Suzie, a supervising architect estimated the construction cost of the rental property for capital works deduction purposes at $115,800. This includes the cost of the house, the in-ground swimming pool, the protective fencing and the timber decking. Although the retaining wall and the concrete driveway are structural improvements, they were constructed before 27 February 1992. In Table 1, structural improvements qualified for deduction from 27 February 1992. Therefore, they don't form part of the construction cost for the purposes of the capital works deduction and weren't included in the $115,800 estimate.

Greg and Suzie can claim a capital works deduction of 2.5% of the construction costs per year. As they acquired the property on 20 July 2025, they can claim the deduction for the 346 days from 20 July 2025 to 30 June 2026. Work out the maximum deduction for 2025–26 as follows:

Construction cost × rate × portion of year = deductible amount

$115,800 × 2.5% × (346 ÷ 365) = $2,744

The denominator is 365 days, irrespective of a leap year. The numerator can be 366 days in a leap year.

End of example

The cost of engaging an appropriately qualified person to estimate the construction costs of a rental property is deductible in the income year you incur the expense. You make your claim for the expense, or your share of the expense if you incur it jointly, at D10 Cost of managing tax affairs 2026 in your tax return.

For more information on construction expenditure and capital works deductions, see:

Cost base adjustments for capital works deductions

In working out a capital gain or capital loss from a rental property, you may need to reduce the cost base and reduced cost base to the extent that it includes construction expenditure for which you have claimed or can claim a capital works deduction.

Cost base

You must exclude from the cost base of a CGT asset the amount of capital works deductions you claimed or can claim for the asset if you either:

  • acquire the asset after 7:30 pm AEST on 13 May 1997
  • acquire the asset before that time and the expenditure that gave rise to the capital works deductions was incurred after 30 June 1999.

A CGT asset includes a building, structure or other capital improvement to land that is treated as a separate asset for CGT purposes.

For information on when a building, structure or other capital improvement to land is treated as a CGT asset separate from the land, see Major capital improvements to a dwelling acquired before 20 September 1985 in Guide to capital gains tax 2026.

Reduced cost base

Exclude the amount of the capital works deductions you have claimed or can claim for expenditure you incur for an asset from the reduced cost base.

For more information on whether you can claim certain capital works deductions, see:

  • Taxation Determination TD 2005/47 Income tax: what do the words ‘can deduct’ mean in the context of those provisions in Division 110 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 which reduce the cost base or reduced cost base of a CGT asset by amounts you ‘have deducted or can deduct’, and is there a fixed point in time when this must be determined?
  • Practice Statement Law Administration PS LA 2006/1 (GA) Calculating cost base of a CGT asset where there is insufficient information to determine any capital works deduction under Division 43 of the ITAA 1997.
Example 30: capital works deduction

Zoran bought a rental property on 1 July 1998 for $200,000. Before disposing of the property on 30 June 2026, he had claimed $10,000 in capital works deductions.

At the time of disposal, the cost base of the property was $210,250. Zoran must reduce the cost base of the property by $10,000 to $200,250.

End of example

Limited recourse debt arrangements

You must include excessive deductions for capital allowances as assessable income, if expenditure on a depreciating asset (which includes construction expenditure) is financed or refinanced wholly or partly by limited recourse debt. This includes a notional loan under certain hire purchase or instalment sale agreements of goods.

This will occur where the limited recourse debt arrangement terminates but hasn't been paid in full by the debtor. Because the debt hasn't been paid in full, the capital allowance deductions, including capital works deductions, for the expenditure exceed the deductions that would be allowable if the unpaid amount of the debt wasn't counted as capital expenditure of the debtor. Special rules apply for working out whether the debt has been paid in full.

If you're not sure what constitutes a limited recourse debt or how to work out your adjustment to assessable income, contact your recognised tax adviser.

Prepaid expenses

If you prepay a rental property expense, such as insurance or interest on money you borrow, you can claim an immediate deduction if:

  • the expense covers a period of 12 months or less, and
  • the period ends on or before 30 June 2027.

A prepayment that doesn't meet these criteria and is $1,000 or more may have to be spread over 2 or more years. This is also the case if you can, but choose not to, deduct certain prepaid business expenses immediately.

If your property is your holiday home, you can't claim deductions for prepaid expenses that relate to your ownership and use of the property unless it is used (or held for use) mainly to produce rental income.

If you use your property partly to produce income and partly for private purposes, you need to apportion your prepaid expenses.

For more information, see Deductions for prepaid expenses 2026.

Continue to: Apportionment of rental expenses

Return to: Rental income

Apportionment of rental expenses

There may be situations where not all of your expenses are deductible, and you need to work out the deductible portion. To do this you subtract any non-deductible expenses from the total amount you have for each category of expense; what remains is your deductible expense.

You'll need apportion your expenses, that is, work out the amount of your expenses that relate to your income-producing activities, if any of the following apply:

If you co-own your rental property with someone, rental income and expenses must be attributed to each co-owner according to your legal interest in the property.

Expenses, other than those that aren't allowable because your property is a holiday home, need to be apportioned on a fair and reasonable basis if your rental property is used for more than one purpose during the income year. For example, if your rental property is used, or held, to produce assessable income and you also use it for private purposes, your expenses will need to be apportioned.

What is fair and reasonable usually depends on the:

You may need to use a combination of the time-based and the area-based apportionment methods if you rented out part of your property for part (or parts) of the income year.

Your expenses may also need to be apportioned if you charge rent which is less than the market rate. If the rent is assessable, it's considered fair and reasonable in these circumstances to apportion for your private and domestic use of the property by limiting the deductible rental expenses to the amount of the rental income you receive. For more information on how to apportion deductions when you charge less than market rates for rent, see Other methods.

If the rent you receive isn't included in your assessable income, no expenses will be allowed as deductions. For more information on when rent will and won't be assessable, see Rental income you must declare.

You don't need to apportion expenses:

  • that relate solely to renting out the property, such as advertising for tenants and real estate commissions if you rent your property to family and friends at the market rate of rent.

To establish that your property has been rented at a market rate of rent, you will need to provide evidence to show how the market rate was calculated at the time the rent amount was set. For example, a real estate rent valuation or listings for similar properties available in the area the property is located at the same time your property was available for rent.

 

 

Property used or held for part-year rental

If you use your property for both private purposes and to produce assessable rental income, you can't claim a deduction for the portion of any expenses that relate to your private use. That is, you can't claim a deduction for any expenses you incur for those periods when the property wasn't used or held to earn rental income. This includes when you, your relatives or your friends use it for private purposes.

Where property is a holiday home and ownership and use expenses are not denied, you can use the time-based method to work out your deductions if your property was used or held to earn rental income for part of the income year. For example, if your property was rented from 2 February to 30 June.

In some circumstances it may be easy to calculate the portion of an expense that is private in nature. For example, council rates paid for a full year could be apportioned according to the proportion of the year that:

  • the property was rented out, and
  • available for rent on commercial terms.

It may not be appropriate to apportion all your expenses on the same basis. For example, expenses that relate solely to the renting of your property are fully deductible and you don't need to apportion them based on the time the property was rented out. Such costs include:

  • real estate agent commissions
  • sharing economy platform fees and commissions
  • costs of advertising for tenants
  • phone calls you make to a tradesperson to fix damage caused by a tenant
  • the cost of removing rubbish left by tenants.

Certain expenses that relate solely to periods when the property isn't rented out aren't deductible. This would include the cost of phone calls you make to a tradesperson to fix damage caused when you were using the property for private purposes.

Time-based method

To work out your rental property deductions for periods when you used (or held) your property to earn assessable rental income using the time-based method, use the following formula:

[(days used to produce income + days held to produce income) ÷ number of days in the income year you owned the property] × expenses

Where:

  • The 'days used to produce income' is the number of days your property is occupied for rent, which includes days for which rent is paid even if the property is not physically occupied.
  • The 'days held to produce income' is the number of days your property is unoccupied but available for rent on commercial terms.

If you rent a room in your home, your property won't be available for rent on commercial terms on days when the room is unoccupied during the income year. This means your 'days held to produce income' will be zero and only those days where the room is rented will be taken into account. This is because when the room in your home is not being rented out, it is treated as being used privately as part of your home and isn't available for rent on commercial terms.

Example 31: renting out a spare room in a residential property

Lucille has a spare room in her private home that she rents out at commercial rates to students studying at a nearby university. She advertises the room on a real estate website and actively monitors requests to rent the room.

For periods when the room in her home is not rented out, it is treated as being used privately as part of her home and is not available for rent on commercial terms.

Lucille apportions her rental expenses and only claims a deduction for the period the room is rented out, excluding periods when it is not rented.

As only part of Lucille's home is being rented, she will also need to apportion her expenses using the area-based method.

End of example

Available for rent on commercial terms

Factors that indicate that your property is available for rent on commercial terms include:

  • It being advertised in ways which gives it broad exposure to potential tenants
  • the rental terms, including the rental rate, are similar to comparable properties in the same area
  • requests to rent the property are actively monitored.

Factors that indicate your property isn't available for rent on commercial terms include:

  • it's advertised in ways that limit its exposure to potential tenants – for example, you only advertise the property
    • at your workplace
    • by word of mouth
    • on restricted social media groups
    • during periods when the likelihood of it being rented out is very low
  • the property is blocked out for private usage by you or your family and friends (at less than market rates) during periods of likely rental demand
  • the location, condition or accessibility to the property, mean that it's unlikely tenants will seek to rent it
  • placing unreasonable or stringent conditions on tenants renting out the property, when compared to similar properties, that reduce the likelihood of the property being rented out, for example
    • setting the rent above the rate of comparable properties in the area
    • requiring prospective tenants to provide references for short holiday stays as well as having conditions like ‘no children’
    • making parts of the property inaccessible to tenants
  • requests to rent the property are not actively monitored or you refuse to rent out the property to interested people without adequate reasons.
Example 32: unreasonable rental conditions placed on property

Josh and Maria are retired and own a holiday home where they stay periodically. They advertise the property for short-term holiday rental through a real estate agent.

Josh and Maria instruct the agent that they must personally approve tenants before they can stay, and prospective tenants must provide references and have no children.

At no time during the year do Josh and Maria agree to rent out the property even though they receive several inquiries.

The conditions Josh and Maria place on renting the property and their refusal to rent it to prospective tenants shows they don't use or hold the property mainly to earn rental income. Josh and Maria can't claim any deductions for the property.

Josh and Maria need to keep records of their expenses. If they make a capital gain when they sell the property, their property expenses (such as property insurance, interest on the amount they borrow to purchase the property, repair costs, maintenance costs and council rates) may be taken into account in working out any capital gain or loss they make on sale.

End of example

 

Example 33: separate unit available for rent on commercial terms

Brian has a separate self-contained studio apartment that he uses exclusively as a rental unit, which is on the same land as his house. He advertises the apartment through a real estate agent and on sharing economy platforms. Brian sets the rental terms and rate similar to comparable properties nearby and actively monitors requests to rent the property.

Demand for short-term accommodation in the area is highest from December to February and during school and public holidays. During these peak periods, the studio apartment is rented out on almost all the days. At other times of the year, when demand is lower, Brian varies the rental rate to attract bookings and maximise rental income. During the year, Brian rented out the apartment for a total of 330 days.

For periods when the apartment is not rented, it is available for rent on commercial terms.

End of example

Time-based apportionment examples

 

Example 34: apportionment for private use of holiday home used (or held for use) mainly to produce rental income

Lennard and Alex jointly own a property which was brand new when they purchased it. They rented the property out at market rates and advertised the property for rent during the year through a real estate agent. Lennard and Alex instructed the real estate agent to actively monitor requests to maximise occupancy for the property. The property is regularly rented on a short-stay basis and has a high occupancy rate.

During the year (which is not a leap year), Lennard and Alex:

  • used the property themselves for 35 days for their holidays when rental demand for the property was low
  • received $50,000 from renting out the property
  • had expenses of $37,000 for interest on the funds borrowed to purchase the property, property insurance, maintenance costs, council rates, the decline in value of depreciating assets and capital works deductions
  • incurred $3,000 for agent's commission and the cost of advertising for tenants.

 

Because Lennard and Alex use the property for their holidays and recreation, the property is a holiday home. While the property is also their holiday home, deductions relating to the ownership and use wouldn't be denied because it was mainly used and held for use to earn rental income.

Lennard and Alex can claim the full $3,000 as a deduction for the agent’s commission and costs of advertising for tenants.

For the 35 days Lennard and Alex used the property themselves they can't claim any deductions. They will need to apportion their other expenses ($37,000) according to the number of days during the income year the property was rented out and available for rent on commercial terms.

Income tax return

Lennard and Alex's rental income and deductions for the year are as follows:

  • Rent received = $50,000
  • Rental deductions = $36,452
    (330 ÷ 365 days × $37,000) + $3,000
  • Net rental income= $13,548.

As they're joint owners, Lennard and Alex declare net rental income of $6,774 each in their tax returns.

Lennard and Alex need to keep records of their expenses. If they make a capital gain when they sell the property, the proportion of the expenses they couldn't claim a deduction for are taken into account in working out any capital gain.

End of example

Clear change in use of your rental property during the income year

When there is a clear change in the use of your rental property during the income year, for example, when your property starts or stops being used as a rental, the time-based method can be used to apportion your expenses.

The change of use must be definite and will be determined based on the actual use of the property. The use of a rental property doesn't change due to fluctuations in the demand for the property due to seasonal patterns, such as a ski lodge or a beach house.

Example 35: change in use of rental property

Sunita owns a property in Geraldton which she has rented out as a long-term rental for 8 years. After she retires, Sunita decides to move into the Geraldton property.

The tenants move out on 1 March and Sunita moves into the property a couple of weeks later. From 2 March, the property is used by Sunita for private purposes.

During the income year (which is not a leap year), Sunita incurs interest expenses and rates of $18,596 and real estate commission expenses of $1,664. She also incurred repair expenses of $3,000 to fix the wear and tear and damages that occurred to the property while it was rented out.

Sunita can claim a deduction of $1,664 for the real estate commission expenses and $3,000 for the repair expenses. These expenses don't need to be apportioned because they relate solely to the period she rented the property out.

Sunita must apportion the other expenses because the property stopped being a rental property part way through the income year. Sunita calculates the number of days the property was used to produce income as 245 days (period from 1 July to 2 March).

Using the time-based method, Sunita calculates her interest and rates expenses as:

245 days ÷ 365 days × $18,596 = $12,482

The total deductions Sunita can claim for the income year is $17,146 ($12,482 + $1,664 + $3,000).

End of example

Only part of your property is used to earn rent

If you rent out part of your property (for example, the lower floor of a 2-storey property or a bedroom in your home) you need to work out your expenses using the area-based method. You must also apportion your expenses using the time-based method if you only rented out that part of your property for part of the year.

Area-based method

The formula for apportioning expenses using the area-based method is:

[(A + (B ÷ 2)) ÷ C] × expenses incurred

Where:

  • A is the floor area of the property solely occupied by the tenant
  • B is the floor area of the common areas
  • C is the floor area of the whole property.

 

Example36: apportionment using area-based method

Kim owns a 2-storey townhouse and rents out the bottom floor to a long-term tenant. They each have exclusive possession of their floor. They share the use of the gardens around the house.

The top floor has a large deck and is 55 square metres, the bottom floor is 45 square metres, and the gardens are 35 square metres. The total property is 135 square metres (55 + 45 + 35 = 135).

Kim would work out her apportionment percentage using the area-based method as follows:

[45 square metres + (35 square metres ÷ 2)] ÷ 135 square metres = 0.4629

0.4629 x 100 = 46.3%.

Kim can claim 46.3% of the allowable expenses she incurs related to the property as a deduction.

End of example

 

Example 37: apportionment using area-based method and time-based method

Jane has a 2-bedroom, 2-bathroom unit in a high rise apartment. Jane lives alone and mainly uses the master bedroom and ensuite bathroom. The second bedroom and main bathroom is accessible from the common areas of the unit including the lounge, kitchen and balcony and is mainly used by visitors.

Part way through the income year, Jane decided to let out the second bedroom and advertised it on a sharing economy platform. She actively monitored replies from the listing and didn't refuse guests when the room was available. Jane rented the second bedroom of her property for 100 days during the income year.

The unit is 80 square metres in total. The second bedroom being let is 10 square metres. Jane also gave paying guests access to common areas including the main bathroom, kitchen, lounge and balcony, which totals 50 square metres. Jane allowed guests access to her wi-fi for free if they wished to use it.

For the period guests stayed and had access to the common areas (along with Jane), Jane can claim 50% of the deductible portion of costs related to the common areas.

During the income year, Jane incurred interest expenses, rates, body corporate fees, , electricity and internet expenses for the property of $26,153. Jane also incurred sharing platform commission fees of $425.

To apportion her expenses and work out how much she can claim as a deduction, Jane must use the area-based method. Jane must also use the time-based method, because she only rented her second bedroom for 100 days during the income year.

Even if Jane had the room listed for rent for the whole income year, the days it was unoccupied wouldn't be treated as days held to produce income. This is because when the room wasn't rented out, it's treated as being used privately by Jane. Therefore, the number of days held to produce income at commercial rates when the bedroom wasn't rented will be zero.

Step 1 – apply the area-based method

Jane works out the percentage of the house her paying guests have access to using the area-based method as follows:

10 square metres + (50 square metres ÷ 2) ÷ 80 square metres = 0.4375

0.4375 × 100 = 43.75%

Step 2 – apply the time-based method

Jane uses the following formula to calculate the time during the income year that she used part of her property to produce rental income:

100 days used to produce income ÷ 365 days = 0.27397

0.27397 × 100 = 27.4%

By multiplying the time-based method and area-based method together, Jane will be able to work out what percentage of her yearly expenses are deductible.

43.75% × 27.4% = 11.99%

Jane can claim a deduction for 11.99% of her total ownership and use expenses, that is her interest expenses, rates, body corporate fees, electricity and internet expenses ($26,153 x 11.99% = $3,136). Jane can also claim 100% of the expenses associated solely with renting out the second bedroom, that is, the sharing economy platform's service fees or commission ($425).

For the income year, Jane can claim a deduction for rental expenses of $3,561 ($3,136 + $425).

End of example

 

Example 38: renting out part of a residential property

Michael’s private residence includes a self-contained flat. The floor area of the house is 120 square metres and the floor area of the flat is 40 square metres. The garden around the property is 40 square metres so the total area of the house, self-contained unit and gardens is 160 square metres. Michael rented out the flat for 6 months in the income year (184 days) at $300 per week. During the rest of the year his niece, Fiona, lived in the flat rent free (183 days).

The garden is shared by Michael and the tenant for the first 6 months and with Fiona for the second 6 months of the year.

The annual mortgage interest, building insurance, rates and taxes for the whole property amounted to $15,000.

Step 1 – apply the area-based method

40 square metres + (40 square metres ÷ 2) ÷ 160 square metres = 0.375

0.375 x 100 = 37.5%

Step 2 – apply the time-based method

184 days used to produce income ÷ 365 days = 0.504

0.504 x 100 = 50.4%

By multiplying the time-based method and area-based method together, Michael will be able to work out what percentage of his yearly expenses are deductible.

37.5% × 50.44% = 18.9%

Michael can claim 18.9% of his mortgage interest, building insurance, rates and taxes ($15,000 x 18.9% = $2,835). Michael's net rental income from the property would be calculated as:

  • Rent = $7,800
    26 weeks × $300
  • Expenses = $2,835
  • Net rental income = $4,965.
End of example

Other methods

You may have to use other methods to apportion your expenses if you rented your property on a non-arm's length basis.

Non-arm's length rental

If you're renting your property to family or friends and charging less than the market rate of rent, your property has a mixed use. These uses are:

  • producing assessable rental income
  • a private or domestic use of providing accommodation for your family and friends.

In these circumstances, your deductions must be apportioned to exclude the amount related to the private or domestic use of the property. Where the expenses you incur that would otherwise be deductible exceed the amount of rent you receive, a fair and reasonable way to apportion your expenses is to limit them to the amount of rental income derived from the property. This will result in no net rental income or loss.

 

Example39: rent below market rate to family

Jana rents a property she owns to her mother for her to live in. Although Jana's mother has signed a standard lease agreement, Jana has set the rent at a below market rate.

Jana provides the discount for private or domestic reasons to assist her mother who cannot afford to pay rent at the market rate.

During the income year Jana received rent of $15,600 from her mother and she incurs rental expenses, including mortgage interest expenses, council and water rates and capital works of $20,578.

Jana includes the amount of $15,600 that she receives as rent from her mother as assessable income in her return. As Jana's deductible expenses exceed the amount of rent Jana received, she limits her deductions for mortgage interest, capital works, council and water rates to the amount of rent received from her mother ($15,600).

Jana has no net rental income or loss.

End of example

Investment loan used for private purposes

If you take out a loan to purchase a rental property, you can claim the interest on that loan as a deduction. However, to the extent that the loan is used or refinanced for a private purpose, or partly for a private purpose, you must apportion the interest expense to account for the private use.

 

Example 40: investment loan used for partial private purpose

Rufus has owned his apartment for several years and is now looking to turn it into a rental when he upgrades to a larger residence.

Rufus still has a mortgage over the apartment and decides to refinance the mortgage into an investment loan. When the loan is refinanced, Rufus uses part of the new loan to purchase his new private residence.

Rufus must apportion his interest expenses and can only claim a deduction for interest expenses to the extent they relate to producing his rental income from the original apartment. He can't claim a deduction for any portion of the expenses which relate to the purchase of his private residence.

End of example

A simple example of the necessary calculation for apportionment of interest is in example 12.

For more information, see Taxation Ruling TR 2000/2 Income tax: deductibility of interest on moneys drawn down under line of credit facilities and redraw facilities.

For more information, see:

  • Taxation Ruling TR 2026/1 Income tax: rental property income and deductions for individuals who are not in business
  • Practical Compliance Guideline PCG 2026/2 Apportionment of rental property deductions – ATO compliance approach
  • Practical Compliance Guideline PCG 2026/3 Application of section 26-50 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 to holiday homes that you also rent out – ATO compliance approach
  • Taxation ruling TR 97/23 Income tax: deductions for repairs.

QC107058