Class Ruling

CR 2012/37

Luxury car tax: meaning of 'luxury car'

• Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this ruling.
  From 1 July 2015, the term 'Australia' is replaced in nearly all instances within the GST, Luxury Car Tax, and Wine Equalisation Tax legislation with the term 'indirect tax zone' by the Treasury Legislation Amendment (Repeal Day) Act 2015. The scope of the new term, however, remains the same as the now repealed definition of 'Australia' used in those Acts. This change was made for consistency of terminology across the tax legislation, with no change in policy or legal effect. For readability and other reasons, where the term 'Australia' is used in this document, it is referring to the 'indirect tax zone' as defined in subsection 195-1 of the GST Act.

What this Ruling is about

1. This Ruling sets out the Commissioner's opinion on the way in which the relevant provision(s) identified below apply to the defined class of entities, who take part in the scheme to which this Ruling relates.

Relevant provision(s)

2. The relevant provision dealt with in this Ruling is:

•

section 25-1 of the A New Tax System (Luxury Car Tax) Act 1999 (LCT Act).

All subsequent legislative references in the Ruling are to the LCT Act unless otherwise indicated.

Class of entities

3. The class of entities to which this Ruling applies are those entities that:

•

have an agreement with Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Ltd (Toyota);

•

have an agreement with Prestige Motors Pty Ltd; or

•

have an agreement with Eastpoint Pty Ltd; and

•

pursuant to the agreement with Toyota, Prestige Motors Pty Ltd or Eastpoint Pty Ltd, are entitled to:

(a)

be supplied with Toyota vehicles, parts and goods by Toyota or the Distributors, in Australia, from time to time; and

(b)

sell the Toyota vehicles supplied to them under the agreement.

4. A reference to a Toyota dealer is a reference to the above class of entities.

5. A reference to Distributors is a reference to Prestige Motors Pty Ltd and/or Eastpoint Pty Ltd.

Qualifications

6. The Commissioner makes this Ruling based on the precise scheme identified in this Ruling.

7. The class of entities defined in this Ruling may rely on its contents provided the scheme actually carried out is carried out in accordance with the scheme described in paragraphs 11 to 21 of this Ruling.

8. If the scheme actually carried out is materially different from the scheme that is described in this Ruling, then:

•

this Ruling has no binding effect on the Commissioner because the scheme entered into is not the scheme on which the Commissioner has ruled; and

•

this Ruling may be withdrawn or modified.

9. This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to:

Commonwealth Copyright Administration

Copyright and Classification Policy Branch

Attorney-General's Department

3-5 National Circuit

Barton ACT 2600

or posted at: http://www.ag.gov.au/cca

Date of effect

10. This Ruling applies to tax periods commencing on or after 1 February 2005. The Ruling applies to all entities within the specified class who entered into the specified scheme on or after 1 February 2005. However, this Ruling will not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of a settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of this Ruling (see paragraphs 75 and 76 of Taxation Ruling TR 2006/10).

Scheme

11. The following description of the scheme is based on information provided by the applicant. The following documents, or relevant parts of them form part of and are to be read with the description:

•

Application for Class Ruling dated 17 November 2011;

•

Copy of the template of agreement used between Toyota and its dealers (Toyota Dealer Agreement);

•

List of the 32 models (variants) of the four classes of Toyota HiLux vehicles mentioned below;

•

Information for each of the 32 variants, consisting of the gross vehicle mass (GVM), un-laden mass (UM), and the seating capacity including the driver;

•

Correspondence dated 8 February 2012 received in relation to the Class Ruling application; and

•

Communications with the applicant.

12. Toyota is a manufacturer, distributor and exporter of motor vehicles.

13. The Toyota dealers have an agreement with either Toyota or the Distributors.

14. Pursuant to the agreement, the Toyota dealers are entitled to be supplied with Toyota vehicles by Toyota or the Distributors.

15. The Toyota dealers are or have been supplied with, and sell the following vehicles to the public:

(a)

HiLux Single Cab vehicles;

(b)

HiLux Xtra Cab vehicles;

(c)

HiLux Double Cab vehicles; and

(d)

HiLux TRD vehicles.

16. There are 32 variants of the abovementioned four classes of vehicles.

17. In this Class Ruling, the 32 variants of the abovementioned four classes of vehicles are collectively referred to as the HiLux Vehicles.

18. All the HiLux Vehicles are designed to carry a load of less than two tonnes and fewer than 9 passengers.

19. The HiLux TRD vehicles ceased production in 2008.

20. In this Class Ruling, the HiLux Single Cab, Xtra Cab and Double Cab vehicles are collectively referred to as HiLux Standard Range vehicles.

21. For the purposes of this Class Ruling, the HiLux Standard Range vehicles are vehicles from the 1 February 2005 production until the June 2011 production modifications; and from the June 2011 production modifications.

Ruling

22. The HiLux Vehicles do not fall within the meaning of 'luxury car' under section 25-1 of the LCT Act.

23. Accordingly, when the Toyota dealers supply a HiLux Vehicle, no luxury car tax (LCT) is payable on the supply.

Commissioner of Taxation
30 May 2012

Appendix 1 - Explanation

Meaning of luxury car

24. Section 5-5 of the LCT Act provides that an entity must pay LCT on any taxable supply of a luxury car that it makes.

25. Section 5-10 of the LCT Act sets out the requirements for a taxable supply of a luxury car, including that the supply is that of a luxury car.

26. Subsection 25-1(1) of the LCT Act provides that a luxury car is a car, whose luxury car tax value exceeds the luxury car tax threshold.

27. The Dictionary in section 27-1 of the LCT Act provides that a car means a motor vehicle (except a motor cycle or similar vehicle) that is designed to carry a load of less than 2 tonnes and fewer than 9 passengers or a limousine (regardless of the number of passengers it is designed to carry). As the HiLux Vehicles are all designed to carry less than two tonnes and fewer than 9 passengers, they meet the definition of a car.

28. However, paragraph 25-1(2)(c) of the LCT Act provides that a car is not a luxury car if it is a commercial vehicle that is not designed for the principal purpose of carrying passengers.

29. Accordingly, an entity does not have to pay LCT on a car with a value above the LCT threshold, if it is a commercial vehicle.

30. Some vehicles with a load carrying capacity (load capacity) of less than two tonnes can be designed to carry both passengers and goods. These vehicles include: dual cab vehicles; crew cab vehicles; and utility vehicles.

31. These vehicles will be referred to as dual purpose vehicles. The principal purpose of such a vehicle depends on the load capacity of the vehicle and whether it is designed to carry mainly passengers or goods.

32. From the information provided, in relation to the gross vehicle mass (GVM), un-laden mass (UM), and the seating capacity including the driver, for each of vehicles in the 32 variants, it is concluded that the HiLux vehicles are dual purpose vehicles.

33. However, to determine whether a HiLux Vehicle is a vehicle designed for the principal purpose of carrying goods for business or trade (i.e. a commercial vehicle), regard is had to the Australian Design Rules.

34. The Australian Design Rules Definitions and Vehicle Categories state that:

A vehicle constructed for both the carriage of persons and the carriage of goods shall be considered to be primarily for the carriage of goods if the number of seating positions times 68kg is less than 50 percent of the difference between the 'Gross Vehicle Mass' and the 'Un-laden Mass'.

35. Thus, the process to determine whether any of the dual purpose vehicles supplied pre and post 1 July 2011 constitutes a luxury car is as follows:

•

determine whether the LCT value of the vehicle exceeds the LCT threshold. If so;

•

calculate the difference between the gross vehicle mass and the un-laden mass of the vehicle in kilograms and then calculate 50% of that difference;

•

calculate the total passenger weight by multiplying the total seating capacity including the driver by 68kg;

•

determine whether the total passenger weight exceeds 50% of the difference between the gross vehicle mass and the un-laden mass;

•

if so, the principal purpose of the vehicle is to carry passengers and it is a luxury car within the meaning of section 25-1 of the LCT Act; and

•

If not, the principal purpose of the vehicle is for the carriage of goods and it is not a luxury car within the meaning of section 25-1 of the LCT Act.

36. Attachments A and B list the 32 models of the HiLux Vehicles that are not luxury cars under section 25-1 of the LCT Act.

Appendix 2 - Detailed contents list

37. The following is a detailed contents list for this Ruling:

Attachment A

Toyota HiLux vehicle models supplied prior to 1 July 2011

Attachment B

Toyota HiLux vehicle models supplied after 1 July 2011

Not previously issued as a draft

References

ATO references:
NO 1-3MEC4SR

Related Rulings/Determinations:

TR 2006/10
LCTD 2010/1
LCTD 2011/1

Subject References:
LCT
luxury car
commercial vehicle
dual purpose vehicle

Legislative References:
LCT Act
LCT Act 5-5
LCT Act 5-10
LCT Act 5 10(1)
LCT Act 25-1
LCT Act 25-1(1)
LCT Act 25-1(2)(c)
TAA 1953
Copyright Act 1968

Other References:
NAT 3394