Consolidation Reference Manual

The Consolidation reference manual was last updated on 15 July 2011. It does not contain any changes to consolidation legislation that has occurred since that time and will not be updated in future. It cannot be relied on for currency of content. For any future consolidation changes, you will be able to access information from our consolidation home page or by visiting our 'New legislation' page.
You can still refer to the Consolidation reference manual for consolidation information that has not been impacted by changes in the legislation.

C3 Losses

C3-4 Worked example - loss utilisation

Amount that can be utilised

C3-4-416 Amount of transferred losses that can be utilised - application of paragraph 36-17(5)(a)

Description

This example illustrates the application of the restriction in paragraph 36-17(5)(a) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) to a choice made by a head company to deduct a transferred tax loss against its taxable income.

Note
For more information about:
loss utilisation and franking offsets → 'Amount of transferred losses that can be utilised - franking offsets', C3-4-415
the restriction in paragraph 36-17(5)(b) → 'Amount of transferred losses that can be utilised - application of paragraph 36-17(5)(b)', C3-4-417 .

Commentary

Amendments to Division 36 of the ITAA 1997 enable corporate tax entities to choose the amount of prior year tax losses they wish to deduct in a later year of income, subject to certain restrictions → section 36-17. Also, a current year tax loss that would otherwise be 'wasted' against franked dividend income can be carried forward to a later year of income. The quantum of the tax loss is determined by reference to the amount of excess franking offsets [1] for the income year → section 36-55.

Where a corporate tax entity chooses to deduct a prior year tax loss against its taxable income of a later income year, the restriction in paragraph 36-17(5)(a) applies. This paragraph states that if a corporate tax entity would have excess franking offsets in the later income year - disregarding the earlier year tax loss and any other tax losses - the entity must choose a nil amount of the tax loss.

This is so regardless of the limit for utilisation of a transferred tax loss as worked out under the available fraction method.

Example

Facts

The head company of a consolidated group is working out its taxable income for the income year ended 30 June 2004.

The group's capital gains for the income year are $1,000. There is a group net capital loss of $200 carried forward from the 2003 income year.

The group's 'other assessable income' is $1,500. The group incurred allowable deductions of $1,800 in relation to that income.

The other assessable income includes a franked distribution of $630 plus the franking credit on the distribution of $270. [2]

The group's transferred losses are as shown in table 1.

Table 1: Transferred losses and available fractions
Loss bundle Available fraction Unused transferred losses
Bundle A 0.500 $300 net capital loss
$250 tax loss (not film)

Transferred losses are to be utilised in accordance with the available fraction method.

The head company satisfies the recoupment tests for the utilisation of all losses in the 2004 income year and seeks to utilise losses to the maximum extent possible.

Calculation

A. Apply the three-step available fraction method

Step 1: Work out the categories of group income or gains - subsection 707-310(3)

Table 2: Categories of group income or gains (step 1)
Category of income or gains Gross amount ($) Less: other allowable deductions/ reductions ($) Less: group/concessional losses of the relevant sort ($) Less: transferee's grossed-up franking offset amount (applies only for item 6) ($) Income/gains available for the bundle ($)
Capital gains 1,000 - 200 - 800
Other assessable income 1,500 1,500* - Nil** Nil

*Although allowable deductions are $1,800, only $1,500 needs to be deducted as this reduces the other assessable income category to nil.

**This amount would normally be determined as per paragraph 707-310(3A)(c), i.e. 1/0.3 x $270 = $900. However it is nil in this example as the other assessable income category has been reduced to nil by allowable deductions.

Step 2: Calculate the fraction of the income/gains that is attributable to the bundle - subsection 707-310(3)

Table 3: Fraction of income/gains attributable to each bundle (step 2)
Categories of income or gains Loss bundle Step 1 amount ($) Multiplied by: available fraction (AF) AF amount for the bundle ($)
Capital gains Bundle A 800 0.500 400
Other assessable income Bundle A Nil 0.500 Nil

Step 3: Work out a notional taxable income for the bundle - subsection 707-310(2)

Table 4: Net capital gain (step 3)
Capital gains $ Losses applied $
Capital gains 400 Transferred net capital loss 300
Total 400 Total 300

The notional net capital gain is $100 ($400 - $300).

Table 5: Taxable income (step 3)
Assessable income $ Deductions $
Net capital gain 100 Transferred tax loss (not film) 100
Other assessable income 0
Total 100 Total 100

The notional taxable income is $0 ($100 - $100).

The limits for utilisation of the transferred losses in bundle A by the head company when it determines its actual taxable income for the 2004 income year are as follows:

transferred net capital loss $300
transferred tax loss $100.

B. Determine the head company's actual taxable income

Table 6: Net capital gain
Capital gains $ Losses applied $
Capital gains 1,000 Group capital loss 200
Transferred net capital loss 300
Total 1,000 Total 500

The group's net capital gain is $500 ($1,000 - $500).

Table 7: Taxable income
Assessable income $ Deductions $
Net capital gain 500 Deductions 1,800
Other assessable income 1,500 Transferred tax loss (not film) 0*
Total 2,000 Total 1,800

*In step 3 it is determined that the limit for utilisation of the transferred tax loss in bundle A by the head company when it determines its actual taxable income for the 2004 income year is $100. However, paragraph 36-17(5)(a) prevents the head company from deducting any of this amount. This is so because when disregarding the transferred tax loss, the head company would have an amount of excess franking offsets for the income year of $210 (as shown in table 8). Therefore, the head company must choose a nil amount of the transferred tax loss when working out its taxable income for the income year.

The group's taxable income is $200 ($2,000 - $1,800).

The amount of tax payable for the 2004 income year is shown in table 8.

Table 8: Tax payable and excess franking offset
Taxable income ($) Tax on taxable income (30% corp. tax rate) ($) Less: tax offsets ($) Tax payable ($) Excess franking offsets* ($)
200 60 270 Nil 210 (270 - 60)

*In accordance with subsection 36-55(1).

Applying the method statement in subsection 36-55(2), the amount of excess franking offsets - that is, $210 - generates a tax loss of $700, as shown in table 9.

Table 9: Converting excess franking offsets into tax loss
Steps in subsection 36-55(2) $
Step 1. Work out the amount (if any) that would have been the entity's tax loss for the year under section 36-10 (ignoring net exempt income). 0
Step 2. Divide the amount of excess franking offsets by the corporate tax rate of 30%. 700 (210/0.3)
Step 3. Add the results of steps 1 and 2. 700 (700 + 0)
Step 4. Reduce step 3 result by net exempt income (if any). This is the group tax loss for the 2004 income year. 700 (700 - 0)

Carry-forward losses for the 2004 income year are shown in table 10.

Table 10: Carry-forward losses
Sort Year incurred Bundle $
Group tax loss 2004 - 700
Transferred net capital loss 2003 Bundle A 0 (300 - 300)
Transferred tax loss 2003 Bundle A 250 (250 - 0)

References

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 , section 707-310 ; as amended by Taxation Laws Amendment Act (No. 5) 2003 (No. 142 of 2003), Schedule 8

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 , Division 36 ; as amended by Taxation Laws Amendment Act (No. 5) 2003 (No. 142 of 2003), Schedule 8 :

section 36-17
section 36-55

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 , section 207-20

Explanatory Memorandum to Taxation Laws Amendment Bill (No. 5) 2003, Chapter 5

History

Revision history

Section first published 10 December 2004.

Proposed changes to consolidation

Proposed changes to consolidation announced by the Government are not incorporated into the Consolidation reference manual until they become law. In the interim, information about such changes can be viewed at:

http://assistant.treasurer.gov.au (Assistant Treasurer's press releases)
www.treasury.gov.au (Treasury papers on refinements to the consolidation regime).

Current at 10 December 2004

1 An amount of excess franking offsets is worked out in accordance with subsection 36-55(1).

2 Section 207-20.