Australian Tape Manufacturers Association Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia

(1993) 176 CLR 480
(1993) 112 ALR 53

AUSTRALIAN TAPE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION LTD; BASF AUSTRALIA LIMITED and TDK AUSTRALIA PTY LTD v THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

Court:
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Judges: Mason C.J., Brennan, Deane and Gaudron
Dawson and Toohey
McHugh JJ.

Judgment date: 11 March 1993


Answer the questions reserved for the consideration of the Court as follows:

l. Are Divs 3 and 4 of Pt VC and s.153E of the Copyright Act 1951 (Cth) ("the Act") invalid because:

(a)
they do not constitute a law with respect to copyrights within the meaning of s.51 (xviii) of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia;
(b)

(i)
they constitute a law with respect to taxation within the meaning of s.51 (ii) of the Constitution and a law imposing taxation within the meaning of s. 55 of the Constitution; and
(ii)
the Copyright Amendment Act 1989 (Cth) and/or the Act as amended by that Act deal or deals with the imposition of taxation as well as with other matters;

(c)
they effect an acquisition of property from vendors of blank tapes:

(i)
otherwise than on just terms; or
(ii)
other than for any purpose in respect of which the Parliament has power to make laws contrary to the provisions of s.51(xxxi) of the Constitution; or

(d)
they effect a fiscal exaction from vendors of blank tapes and do not constitute a tax within the meaning of s.51 (ii) of the Constitution or an acquisition of property within the meaning of s.51 (xxxi) of the Constitution?

Answers:
1(a) No.
1(b) (i) and (ii) Yes.
1(c) No.
1(d) No.

2. Are Divs 2 and 4 of Pt VC of the Act invalid because they effect an acquisition of property from copyright owners;

(i)
otherwise than on just terms; or
(ii)
other than for any purpose in respect of which the Parliament has power to make laws contrary to the provisions of s.51(xxxi) of the Constitution?

Answer: No.

Order that the defendant pay one-half of the plaintiffs' costs of the questions reserved.