ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2003/639

Income Tax

Capital gains tax: demerger relief - two original interests - different acquisition times
FOI status: may be released

CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

In applying subsection 115-30(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997), when is a taxpayer treated as having acquired a new interest in a demerged entity as a replacement for two original interests which were acquired at different times?

Decision

The new interest will be treated, for the purposes of subsection 115-30(1) of the ITAA 1997, as having been acquired at the earliest time that either original interest was acquired.

Facts

The taxpayer acquired one share in the head entity of a demerger group in August 2000.

An additional share was acquired in September 2002.

In November 2002 the group undertook a demerger. Under the demerger a CGT event happened to each of the two shares and the taxpayer received one new share in the demerged entity.

The demerger qualified for rollover relief in terms of Division 125 of the ITAA 1997.

In January 2003 the taxpayer sold the share in the demerged entity and made a capital gain.

Reasons for Decision

Subsection 115-25(1) of the ITAA 1997 states that a capital gain can only be a discount capital gain where the asset which gave rise to the capital gain was acquired at least twelve months before the relevant CGT event. The replacement asset, acquired in a replacement-asset rollover, will be treated, for the purposes of subsection 115-30(1) of the ITAA 1997, as having been acquired at the time the original asset involved in the roll-over was acquired. The definition of replacement-asset roll-over in section 112-115 of the ITAA 1997 includes demerger rollovers.

As the taxpayer's two original shares have two different acquisition dates, it is reasonable to treat the new share, for the purposes of subsection 115-30(1) of the ITAA 1997, as having been acquired in August 2000 (the earlier of the two acquisition dates).

[Note: the taxpayer's capital gain satisfies the twelve month ownership requirement to be a discount capital gain.]

Date of decision:  9 July 2003

Year of income:  Year ended 30 June 2003

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
   subsection 112-115
   subsection 115-25(1)
   subsection 115-30(1)
   Division 125

Related ATO Interpretative Decisions
ATO ID 2003/640
ATO ID 2003/641

Keywords
Acquisition of CGT assets
Capital gains
Capital gains tax
CGT original assets
CGT replacement asset roll-over
CGT replacement assets
Demerger roll-over
Demerging entity

Siebel/TDMS Reference Number:  3577833; 1-7QE7JDF

Business Line:  Small Business/Individual Taxpayers

Date of publication:  25 July 2003
Date reviewed:  15 February 2016

ISSN: 1445-2782