• Legal database
Legal database

Draft Taxation Determination

TD 95/D4

Income tax: capital gains: does a person who acquires the benefit of a restrictive covenant incur a capital loss on the expiry of that covenant?

  • Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this draft ruling.
    This document has been finalised by TD 95/54.

FOI status:

draft only - for comment

Preamble

Draft Taxation Determinations (TDs) present the preliminary, though considered, views of the ATO. Draft TDs may not be relied on; only final TDs are authoritative statements of the ATO.

1. Yes. Provided that the benefit of the restrictive covenant does not form part of goodwill on the sale of a business.

2. Subsection 160M(6B) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 applies to deem the person who acquires the restrictive covenant to do so when the covenant is granted.

3. The cost base under subsection 160ZH(3) is the amount paid for the restrictive covenant.

4. On expiry, the restrictive covenant is disposed of in terms of subsection 160M(3)(b) for nil consideration. This results in a capital loss equal to the amount paid for the restrictive covenant.

The capital loss is incurred on the change in the ownership of the benefit (see subsection 160U(4)) i.e. when the covenant expired.

Note 1: If the restrictive covenant is considered to be part of the goodwill of a business there are no capital gains tax consequences until the disposal of that goodwill.
Note 2: The usual clause for restrictive covenants operates for a specified time, e.g. 3 years and a specified geographical area, e.g. 50 km from the City GPO. At the end of the 3 year period we would regard the restrictive covenant as having expired.)

Commissioner of Taxation
4 May 1995

References

ATO references:
NO NAT 95/2836-9

ISSN 1038 - 8982

Subject References:
capital loss
goodwill
restrictive covenant

Legislative References:
ITAA 160M(3)(b)
ITAA 160M(6B)
ITAA 160ZH(3)
ITAA 160U(4)


Back to top