Income tax : overseas travel expenses
Please note that the PDF version is the authorised consolidated version of this ruling and amending notices.This document has been Withdrawn.View the Withdrawal notice for this document.
FOI status:May be releasedFOI number: I 1174848
By memorandum dated 10 December 1984, it was stated that no appeal would be lodged against a decision of Board of Review No. 3 reported as Case R87, 84 ATC 588; Case 140, 27 CTBR(NS) 1093 where the Board held (inter alia) that a draftsman/part-time student was entitled to a partial deduction for the cost of undertaking an eight week study tour of Europe.
2. The taxpayer was, during the 1981 income year, an employed draftsman with a firm of architects and part-time student in the fifth year of a six year architectural design course at a tertiary institution. During that year, he undertook an eight week study tour to Europe that included attendance at a 6 day architectural design conference in Helsinki. The trip was undertaken at the suggestion of the taxpayer's lecturer and with the approval of his employers.
4. The Board, by majority (Mr M.B. Hogan Chairman, dissenting) found that the trip had a number of purposes that included a holiday purpose, a study related purpose and a business purpose. In allowing a further deduction of $412, the Board held that 60% of the expenditure claimed, excluding $250 for the purchase of a camera, was directly related to the taxpayer's employment. In so concluding, the majority was of the view that the experience and knowledge gained on the trip directly benefited the taxpayer in the performance of his duties as an employed draftsman and would improve his career prospects. The Chairman considered that the whole amount, excluding the purchase of the camera, was direcly related to the taxpayer's employment.
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
11 April 1985