Toll (FGCT) Pty Limited v Alphapharm Pty Limited & Ors
[2004] HCA 52Toll (Fgct) Pty Limited
vAlphapharm Pty Limited & Ors
Judges:
Gleeson CJ
Gummow J
Hayne J
Callinan J
Heydon J
Subject References:
Contract
Construction and interpretation
Terms
Officer of a corporation authorised to contract on corporation's behalf
Contractual document signed by officer contained onerous terms
Officer failed to read document
Conclusiveness of act of signature or execution
Whether notice of onerous terms or exclusions required
Principal and agent
Contract
Authority
Whether agent authorised to contract on terms that include exclusions of liability of other contracting party
Judgment date: 11 November 2004
1. Appeal allowed with costs.
2. Set aside order 1 of the orders of the New South Wales Court of Appeal and, in lieu thereof, order that the appeal to that Court be allowed with costs.
3. Set aside orders 1, 2 and 4 of the trial judge and in lieu thereof, order that:
- (a)
- the First and Second Plaintiffs' claim in the District Court of New South Wales be dismissed;
- (b)
- judgment be entered for the Defendant;
- (c)
- the First and Second Plaintiffs pay the Defendant's costs of the trial; and
- (d)
- the First and Second Plaintiffs pay the costs of the First and Third Cross Defendants.
4. Order that the First Respondent repay to the Appellant the sum of $683,061.86 together with interest from the date of payment at rates under the District Court Act 1973 (NSW) or as agreed.
Representation:
S J Gageler SC with A S Bell for the appellant (instructed by Clayton Utz)
S T White with E G H Cox for the first respondent (instructed by Withnell Hetherington)
J E Griffiths SC with J K Kirk for the second and third respondents (instructed by Allens Arthur Robinson)
In the Court of Appeal, Young CJ in Eq remarked that the distinction between goods carried at owner's risk and those carried at the carrier's risk with differential rates has been around as long as carriers.
Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd (2003) 56 NSWLR 662.
(1982) 149 CLR 337 at 352.
(2002) 209 CLR 95 at 105-106 [25].
Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW (1982) 149 CLR 337 at 348-353 per Mason J; Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust v South Sydney City Council (2002) 76 ALJR 436; 186 ALR 289.
(2004) 78 ALJR 1045; 208 ALR 213.
Pacific Carriers Ltd v BNP Paribas (2004) 78 ALJR 1045 at 1050-1051 [22]; 208 ALR 213 at 221.
(1983) 151 CLR 422 at 429.
(1877) 2 CPD 416 at 421.
(1948) 76 CLR 646 at 649.
(1988) 165 CLR 197 at 228.
[1934] 2 KB 394 at 403.
(1877) 2 CPD 416 at 421.
(1878) 38 LT 851.
(1878) 38 LT 851 at 853.
MacCormick and Birks (eds), The Legal Mind: Essays for Tony Honoré, (1986), Ch 2, 19 at 34.
MacCormick and Birks (eds), The Legal Mind: Essays for Tony Honoré, (1986), Ch 2, 19 at 35.
See Hart, "The Ascription of Responsibility and Rights", (1949) 49 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 171.
(1975) 132 CLR 355.
Bullen and Leake, Precedents of Pleadings in Personal Actions in the Superior Courts of Common Law, 3rd ed (1868) at 467-468.
(1975) 132 CLR 355 at 359.
See Whelpdale's Case (1604) 5 Co Rep 119a [77 ER 239]; Holdsworth, A History of English Law, 2nd ed (1937), vol 8 at 50-51.
(1948) 76 CLR 646 at 649.
Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport Ltd [1980] AC 827 at 843 per Lord Wilberforce, 851 per Lord Diplock; Darlington Futures Ltd v Delco Australia Pty Ltd (1986) 161 CLR 500 at 507-508; Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 201 CLR 49 at 62 [24].
Hart, "The Ascription of Responsibility and Rights", (1949) 49 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 171 at 174.
[1934] 2 KB 394 at 402-403.
[1894] AC 217.
[1934] 2 KB 394 at 406-407.
(1991) ASC ¶56-038.
Unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales Court of Appeal, 24 December 1992 at 4.
Remath Investments No 6 Pty Ltd v Chanel (Australia) Pty Ltd unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales Court of Appeal, 24 December 1992.
Remath Investments No 6 Pty Ltd v Chanel (Australia) Pty Ltd unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales Court of Appeal, 24 December 1992 at 4.
Remath Investments No 6 Pty Ltd v Chanel (Australia) Pty Ltd unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales Court of Appeal, 24 December 1992 at 9.
[1996] TLR 93.
[1998] 4 VR 661.
[1998] 4 VR 661 at 667.
[1998] 4 VR 661 at 667.
Spencer, "Signature, Consent and the Rule in L'Estrange v Graucob", (1973) Cambridge Law Journal 104.
[1998] 4 VR 661 at 667.
[1927] VLR 326 at 332.
(1951) 84 CLR 91 at 94.
[1962] AC 446 at 474.
[1975] AC 154.
(1980) 144 CLR 300.
Homburg Houtimport BV v Agrosin Ltd [2004] 1 AC 715 at 744.
eg Port Jackson Stevedoring Pty Ltd v Salmond & Spraggon (Australia) Pty Ltd (1978) 139 CLR 231 at 241 per Barwick CJ.