Taxation Determination

TD 2004/62

Income tax: consolidation tax cost setting rules: how does former subsection 701-30(2) of the Income Tax (Transitional Provisions) Act 1997 modify the step 3 amount under section 705-90 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997?

• Please note that the PDF version is the authorised consolidated version of this ruling and amending notices.
  This document has changed over time. View its history.

FOI status:

may be released

1. The purpose of step 3 is to increase the allocable cost amount (ACA) to reflect the undistributed, (owned) taxed profits and so prevent double taxation (see step 3 in the table to section 705-60). When working out the amount added at step 3 of the ACA, you start with the accounting profits as determined under subsection 705-90(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997).^[1] This amount is limited by the reference to the franking account under subsection 705-90(3). The subsection 705-90(3) amount operates as a cap when identifying how much of the undistributed profits accrued to the group under subsection 705-90(6). Once this amount is determined, the excess of undistributed profits should then be considered under the transitional provisions.

2. Former section 701-30 of the Income Tax (Transitional Provisions) Act 1997^[2] (IT(TP)A 1997) is a transitional rule that modifies the operation of step 3 under section 705-90 of the ITAA 1997 for transitional groups formed during the period from 1 July 2002 to the time specified in subsection 701-30(1) of the IT(TP)A 1997. It is noted that this specified time has been amended by item 138 of Part 15 of Schedule 5 to the Tax Laws Amendment (2010 Measures No. 1) Act 2010 which, subject to a choice being made by the head company of the transitional group for the amendment to apply, enables former section 701-30 of the IT(TP)A 1997 to apply to transitional groups that formed on or before the first day of the first income year of the head company starting after 30 June 2003 and before 1 July 2004. This transitional rule allows for the step 3 amount under section 705-90 of the ITAA 1997 to be increased by so much of the undistributed profits (retained profits) that were limited by the operation of subsections 705-90(3) and 705-90(4) of the ITAA 1997. These subsections effectively limit the undistributed, owned profits to those that are 'taxed'. The additional amounts (if any) that are added under this transitional rule represent 'untaxed' amounts in the undistributed profits.

3. The additional amounts added at step 3 in the ACA calculation are, however, limited by former paragraph 701-30(2)(b) IT(TP)A 1997 to so much of those untaxed profits that, if they were distributed just before the consolidated group formed, the recipient would have been entitled to a rebate of income tax under sections 46 or 46A of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) on the dividends. Former paragraph 701-30(2)(a) of the IT(TP)A 1997 refers to the additional amount as the 'step 3 untaxed profits increase'.

Example

4. On 1 July 2001 Beta Co is incorporated as a wholly-owned subsidiary of HCo for $200. During the year ended 30 June 2002 Beta Co acquires two assets for $100 each. Asset 1 is sold during the year for $200, realising a profit of $100. Asset 2 increases in value to $150. Beta Co marks to market and the carrying value of Asset 2 at year end is $150. The accounting standards applicable to Beta Co require that the increase in value of Asset 2 be taken to the Statement of Financial Performance (Profit & Loss Account). After provision for income tax expense of $45, Beta Co's accounting profit is $105. Assessable income for the year is $100, taxable income $100 and tax payable $30. HCo then elects to form a consolidated group as from 1 July 2002. The group is a transitional group and Beta Co is a transitional entity.

5. Beta Co's financial position is as follows:

6. The ACA would be as follows:

7. Beta Co has retained profits of $105 for the purposes of subsection 705-90(2). This amount is limited under subsection 705-90(3) to $70 (franking account balance of $30 70/30). As all of the profits accrued to the group, this is the basic case step 3 amount under subsection 705-90(6). The remaining profits not counted must be tested under the transitional rule for step 3. In this example it is assumed that these untaxed profits could not be distributed as a rebatable dividend just before the joining time. Accordingly, although the untaxed profits of $35 not included in the basic case step 3 amount would satisfy former paragraph 701-30(2)(a) of the IT(TP)A 1997 they would not satisfy former paragraph 701-30(2)(a)paragraph 701-30(2)(b). The step 3 amount in the above table is therefore $70.

8. The ACA of $315 will be reduced by the tax cost setting amount (TCSA) of the retained cost base asset (cash) of $200. The remaining ACA will be allocated to set the TCSA of the reset cost base asset (Asset 2) [paragraph 705-35(1)(c)].

Date of effect

9. This Determination applies to years commencing both before and after its date of issue. However, it does not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of the Determination (see paragraphs 21 and 22 of Taxation Ruling TR 92/20).

Commissioner of Taxation
27 October 2004

Previously issued as Draft TD 2004/D39

References

ATO references:
NO 2004/9766

Related Rulings/Determinations:

TR 92/20

Subject References:
ACA
allocable cost amount
consolidation
cost setting
loss
profits
retained profits
step 3
tax cost setting amount
taxed profits
undistributed profits
untaxed profits

Legislative References:
TAA 1953 Pt IVAAA
ITAA 1936 46
ITAA 1936 46A
ITAA 1997 705-35(1)(c)
ITAA 1997 705-70(1)
ITAA 1997 705-75(1)
ITAA 1997 705-90
ITAA 1997 705-90(2)
ITAA 1997 705-90(3)
ITAA 1997 705-90(4)
ITAA 1997 705-90(6)
IT(TP)A 1997 701-30
IT(TP)A 1997 701-30(1)
IT(TP)A 1997 701-30(2)
IT(TP)A 1997 701-30(2)(a)
IT(TP)A 1997 701-30(2)(b)
IT(TP)A 1997 701-35(1)(c)