Taxation Determination

TD 93/165

Fringe benefits tax: employment agreement: does the payment or the reimbursement of costs, incurred by an employee in association with an employment agreement, give rise to a liability under the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (FBTAA) to the employer?

This version is no longer current. Please follow this link to view the current version.

  • Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this ruling.
    This document has changed over time. View its history.

FOI status:

may be releasedFOI number: I 1215944

1. Yes. Where the employer pays expenses incurred by the employee or reimburses expenses incurred by the employee then the employer provides a fringe benefit under the Fringe Benefits Tax legislation. The value of the fringe benefit may be reduced by the 'otherwise deductible' rule (s. 24 FBTAA).

2. Under the Employee Relations Act (Vic) 1992 relationships between employers and employees are governed by employment agreements. Existing award conditions are to be phased out.

3. An employment agreement is a written, legal and binding confirmation of the employer/employee relationship. The agreement covers rates of pay, working conditions, leave entitlements and many other special provisions. Agreements are for a fixed term, not exceeding five years.

4. Costs may be incurred by both the employer and the employee and include:

representation (which could be a union, an accountant, a lawyer or any other representative) during negotiation;
costs associated with the drawing up of the agreement;
lodgment fees; and
costs associated with settlement of disputes.

Example 1:

Kathy has been employed by Damien since 1984. In March 1993 they arrange for an employment agreement to be drawn up to comply with the new legislation. Kathy takes her contract to her lawyer, who checks it. Her lawyer sends her an account for $350 for services rendered. Damien pays the account.
Damien is liable for Fringe Benefits Tax. However, the value of the fringe benefit is reduced by the amount which would otherwise have been deductible to Kathy. As Kathy would have been entitled to a deduction for this amount, the value of the benefit is reduced to nil.

Example 2:

Charles leaves Goldmine Pty Ltd, to join ABC Bank Pty Ltd. The new job is an advancement for him, as he will be paid a much higher salary and has much better long term prospects. They arrange for an employment agreement to be drawn up to comply with the new legislation. Charles takes the agreement to his lawyer who checks it . He sends him an account for $150 for services rendered. ABC Bank Pty Ltd reimburses Charles for the $150 he paid to his lawyer.
The taxable value of the fringe benefit is $150. As the payment would not have been an allowable deduction to Charles(see TD 93/162), the fringe benefit is the full amount of the payment made by ABC Bank Pty Ltd.

Commissioner of Taxation
19 August 1993

Previously issued as Draft TD 93/D165

References

ATO references:
NO MBN AC MS 1492 CPX 17

ISSN 1038 - 8982

Related Rulings/Determinations:

TD 93/161
TD 93/162
TD 93/163
TD 93/164

Subject References:
employment agreement

Legislative References:
FBTAA 20
FBTAA 24

TD 93/165 history
  Date: Version: Change:
You are here 19 August 1993 Original ruling  
  8 March 2000 Withdrawn