Taxation Determination
TD 93/25
Income tax: are payments to concrete pump truck operators within the building and construction industry liable to deductions of tax under the Prescribed Payments System (PPS)?
This version is no longer current. Please follow this link to view the current version. |
-
Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this ruling.This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.
FOI status:
may be releasedFOI number: I 1214120| This Determination, to the extent that it is capable of being a 'public ruling' in terms of Part IVAAA of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 , is a public ruling for the purposes of that Part. Taxation Ruling TR 92/1 explains when a Determination is a public ruling and how it is binding on the Commissioner. Unless otherwise stated, this Determination applies to years commencing both before and after its date of issue. However, this Determination does not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of a settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of the Determination (see paragraphs 21 and 22 of Taxation Ruling TR 92/20). |
1. Yes. Concrete pump truck operators are contractors engaged in pumping concrete on a construction site. They are involved in construction, and not in the delivery of materials. Therefore payments to such operators fall within the PPS provisions in accordance with sub-regulation 126(1) and paragraph 126(2)(d) of the Income Tax Regulations.
2. This situation is distinct from that of a concrete truck operator i.e. a cement mixer, who merely delivers the concrete to a construction site, and does not take part in the construction phase.
Commissioner of Taxation
18/2/93
Previously issued as Draft TD92/D227
References
ATO references:
NO NEW TD26
Subject References:
prescribed payments system;
building industry
Legislative References:
ITR 126(1);
ITR 126(2)(d)
| Date: | Version: | Change: | |
| You are here | 18 February 1993 | Original ruling | |
| 25 January 2017 | Withdrawn |