Taxation Determination

TD 96/9

Income tax: capital gains: is roll-over relief under section 160ZZO of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 available on the disposal of an asset after 25 June 1992 under subsection 160M(6) or subsection 160M(7)?

This version is no longer current. Please follow this link to view the current version.

  • Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this ruling.
    This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.

FOI status:

may be releasedFOI number: I 1014889

This Determination, to the extent that it is capable of being a 'public ruling' in terms of Part IVAAA of the Taxation Administration Act 1953, is a public ruling for the purposes of that Part. Taxation Ruling TR 92/1 explains when a Determination is a public ruling and how it is binding on the Commissioner. Unless otherwise stated, this Determination applies to years commencing both before and after its date of issue. However, this Determination does not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of a settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of the Determination (see paragraphs 21 and 22 of Taxation Ruling TR 92/20).

1. Roll-over relief is available in relation to a disposal of an asset by a company under subsection 160M(6), provided the other requirements of section 160ZZO are satisfied, but not for a disposal under subsection 160M(7).

2. Section 160ZZO allows roll-over relief if a company (the transferor) disposes of an asset to another company (the transferee) and the transferee is related to the transferor when the disposal takes place.

3. Subsection 160M(6) applies if a person creates an asset that is not a form of corporeal property and, on its creation, the asset is vested in another person. The subject of subsection 160M(6) is an asset that is created and disposed of by one person to another person (see paragraph 160M(6A)(b)). This is consistent with the requirements for section 160ZZO to apply, namely, a disposal of an asset by a transferor to a (related) transferee.

4. In contrast, for subsection 160M(7) to apply, either an act or transaction must take place in relation to an asset, or an event affecting an asset must occur, and money or other consideration must be received by the owner of the underlying asset by reason of that act, transaction or event. If subsection 160M(7) applies, the act, transaction or event is deemed to constitute a disposal of a fictitious or notional 'asset' by the owner of the underlying asset. The 'asset' is deemed to be created by the disposal. The disposal of this notional asset is not deemed to be to another person. No-one is deemed to acquire the notional asset. Nor is there a disposal of the underlying asset or any other actual asset to another person. Given the nature of the 'asset', namely, one created by the disposal (i.e., created by the act, transaction or event), it is difficult to see how the notional asset could be disposed of to anyone. Accordingly, section 160ZZO cannot apply because there is no disposal of the notional asset to a transferee.

Example

In 1995 A Pty Ltd grants a licence to B Pty Ltd, another member of the A Pty Ltd group, and receives $50,000 for the grant. The licence is an asset created under subsection 160M(6) and roll-over relief is available under section 160ZZO on its disposal. The cost base of the licence to B Pty Ltd is the amount that was the indexed cost base to A Pty Ltd (subparagraph 160ZZO(1)(f)(i)) and not the $50,000 paid by B Pty Ltd.

Commissioner of Taxation
14 February 1996

Previously issued as Draft Taxation Determination TD 95/D29.

References

ATO references:
NO CGT Cell (CGDET114); PER LBI; NAT 95/9635-6

ISSN 1038 - 8982

Subject References:
asset
CGT asset
company transferee
company transferor
disposal
notional asset
roll-over

Legislative References:
ITAA 160M(6)
ITAA 160M(6A)(b)
ITAA 160M(7)
ITAA 160ZZO
ITAA 160ZZO(1)(f)(i)

TD 96/9 history
  Date: Version: Change:
You are here 14 February 1996 Original ruling  
  19 May 2004 Withdrawn