ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2002/147

Superannuation

Superannuation, retirement & employment termination: Eligible termination payments and bona fide redundancy payments
FOI status: may be released

This version is no longer current. Please follow this link to view the current version.

  • This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.

CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

Is the payment a bona fide redundancy payment where there was an agreement between the taxpayer and the employer to re-employ the taxpayer after the termination of their employment?

Decision

No. Where there was an agreement between the taxpayer and the employer to re-employ the taxpayer after the termination of their employment, the payment received on termination of the employment is not a bona fide redundancy payment (subsection 27F(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936).

Facts

The taxpayer's permanent full-time employment was terminated. At the time of termination there existed an agreement between the taxpayer and the employer which provided for the taxpayer to be re-employed on a casual basis.

Reasons for Decision

Under subsection 27F(1) of the ITAA 1936 there are 5 conditions which must be satisfied before a payment can be regarded as a bona fide redundancy payment. The conditions require an eligible termination payment (ETP) to be made on termination of employment by reason of bona fide redundancy. The payment must not be from an eligible superannuation fund and the termination must occur before the taxpayer's 65th birthday or before the taxpayer's employment would necessarily have had to terminate. In addition, if the taxpayer and employer were not dealing at arm's length, the ETP must not be greater than the amount that could reasonably be expected to have been paid had the parties been dealing at arms length.

The final condition in paragraph 27F(1)(d) of the ITAA 1936 states that there must not be, at the termination time, any agreement between the taxpayer and the employer, or between the employer and another, to employ the taxpayer after the termination time.

Because of the existence of the agreement to re-employ the taxpayer on a casual basis being in place, the payment could not be regarded as a bona fide redundancy payment.

Date of decision:  8 October 1997

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936
   subsection 27F(1)
   paragraph 27F(1)(d)

Other References:
Previously released as CDS10049

Keywords
Bona fide redundancy
Eligible termination payments

Business Line:  Superannuation

Date of publication:  8 February 2002

ISSN: 1445-2782

history
  Date: Version:
You are here 8 October 1997 Original statement
  4 July 2008 Archived