ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2001/625

Income Tax

Medical expenses tax offset - therapeutic treatment - course of study at a university
FOI status: may be released

This version is no longer current. Please follow this link to view the current version.

  • This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.

CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

Is undertaking a University course for rehabilitation purposes on the recommendation of a qualified medical practitioner, considered 'therapeutic treatment' for the purposes of claiming a medical expense tax offset under section 159P of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936)?

Decision

No, undertaking a University course for rehabilitation purposes on the recommendation of a qualified medical practitioner, is not considered 'therapeutic treatment' for the purposes of claiming a medical expense tax offset under section 159P of the ITAA 1936.

Facts

The taxpayer receives treatment for a psychiatric illness.

A qualified medical practitioner recommended that the taxpayer undertake a course of university study as part of their rehabilitation.

Reasons for Decision

Subsection 159P(3A) of the ITAA 1936 provides that a tax offset is allowable to a taxpayer whose net medical expenses in the year of income exceed $1250.

Paragraph (d) of the definition of medical expenses in subsection 159P(4) of the ITAA 1936 includes therapeutic treatment administered by direction of a legally qualified medical practitioner.

In order to qualify for the tax offset such payments must meet the following conditions:

(1)
they are for therapeutic treatment; and
(2)
the treatment is administered by the direction of a legally qualified medical practitioner.

The general concept of therapeutic treatment is healing or curing rather than preventing the need for therapy (Case S2 85 ATC 102; (1985) 28 CTBR (NS) Case 8).

In Case R95 84 ATC 633; (1984) 27 CTBR (NS) Case 148, the Administrative Appeals Tribunal found that 'therapeutic treatment' necessitated the exercise of professional skill in the medical field. This would normally involve the person administering the treatment using chemical agents or drugs or some physical and mental processes which are directed towards the cure or management of a disease or ailment.

Undertaking a university course of study does not involve any healing or curing, nor is it treatment administered by a person exercising skill in the medical field.

In addition, a mere suggestion or recommendation by a doctor to a patient that the patient undergo therapeutic treatment is not enough for the associated expenses to qualify as medical expenses. The patient must be referred to a particular person for the therapeutic treatment (Case A53 69 ATC 313; (1969) 15 CTBR (NS) Case 30).

The recommendation by the medical practitioner does not meet the requirement that the taxpayer be referred to a particular person for the therapeutic treatment. The expenses incurred in undertaking the university course of study do not meet either of the required criteria and therefore do not qualify as medical expenses for the purposes of the medical expenses tax offset under section 159P of the ITAA 1936.

Date of decision:  9 October 2001

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936
   section 159P
   subsection 159P(3A)
   subsection 159P(4)

Case References:
Case R95
   84 ATC 633

Case 148
   (1984) 27 CTBR (NS) 1154

Case A53
   69 ATC 313

Case 30
   (1969) 15 CTBR (NS) 205

Case S2 / Case 8
   85 ATC 102
   (1985) 28 CTBR (NS) 51

Keywords
Medical expenses
Medical expenses rebates

Business Line:  Small Business/Individual Taxpayers

Date of publication:  28 November 2001

ISSN: 1445-2782

history
  Date: Version:
You are here 9 October 2001 Original statement
  16 April 2010 Archived